Research Paper English 112110 Points Research Question

Paper 3 Research Paperenglish 112110 Pointsresearch Question Assignm

Explain the current controversy you would like to write about. What is the community? (In other words, who would have a stake in this issue?) How do you belong/fit in to or with this community? What keeps you undecided about this issue? What do you need to learn in order to take a stance on the issue? Where do you think you’ll find the most valuable and reputable information? A research question is the overall issue in the form of a question. It’s the question that guides your research. It’s the question for which you want to find an answer. Type your research question below. (Keep in mind that often these questions start with the word “should.”)

Paper For Above instruction

The current controversy I would like to explore pertains to international adoption, specifically focusing on whether this practice should be maintained or abolished. This debate revolves around ethical, cultural, legal, and emotional considerations, with proponents emphasizing the importance of providing children with loving homes and opponents highlighting issues such as loss of cultural identity, the potential exploitation of adoptive families, and the long-term psychological impacts on adoptees. The controversy is particularly relevant within the community of international adoptees, their families, adoption agencies, and policymakers who are involved or affected by these practices. As an adoptive parent myself, I fit into this community through my personal experience of adopting a daughter from South Korea. I have a vested interest in understanding the multifaceted aspects of international adoption, including its moral implications and practical consequences.

What keeps me undecided about this issue is the emotional attachment to my daughter and the positive aspects of adoption, which makes it difficult to argue against a practice that has brought about a loving family for her. At the same time, I am aware of memoirs by adoptees who express feelings of loss, cultural dislocation, and regret, making me question whether the system adequately considers the long-term well-being and cultural preservation of adoptees. Additionally, the high costs, complex legal processes, and ethical concerns about consent and agency make me uncertain about whether current international adoption practices can be truly ethical and fair.

To take a definitive stance, I need to deepen my understanding of the specific conditions and experiences of adoptees in different countries, particularly in India, which I am considering as an alternative focus. I aim to learn more about the conditions of orphans, the legal frameworks governing adoption in both the source and receiving countries, and the societal and governmental support systems. I also want to explore the socioeconomic factors influencing both the countries involved and the families seeking to adopt, as well as the psychological outcomes for adoptees long-term.

I believe that credible sources such as academic journal articles, government reports, NGO publications, and firsthand accounts will provide the most valuable information. I plan to examine databases like JSTOR, PubMed, and government websites for legal and statistical data, and seek out personal interviews with adoptive families and adoptees to gain nuanced perspectives. A comprehensive understanding from multiple viewpoints will be essential to forming an informed opinion on whether international adoption from India should be maintained or abolished.

Paper For Above instruction

The question I am exploring is: Should international adoption from India be maintained or abolished? This question encapsulates the ethical, cultural, legal, and emotional facets of international adoption, with a focus on India due to its recent policy changes and ongoing debates. The controversy centers on whether international adoption is a humane and beneficial practice that gives children access to better lives or whether it perpetuates cultural displacement, exploitation, and systemic issues that violate the rights of children and families.

India presents a complex case study within this controversy. Historically, India has been a significant source country for international adoptions, with thousands of children finding homes in Western countries. However, recent shifts in government policies aim to regulate or restrict these adoptions to protect children’s rights and ensure ethical practices. Critics argue that many children are still vulnerable to exploitation and that the current systems do not provide sufficient oversight or long-term support for adoptees. Supporters, on the other hand, contend that international adoption remains a vital way to address orphanhood and impoverishment, especially given the limited foster care infrastructure in India.

The community directly affected by this debate encompasses adoptees, prospective adoptive parents, birth parents, adoption agencies, NGOs, policymakers, and social workers. As an adoptive parent, I belong to this community through my personal experience of adopting from South Korea, which gives me insight into the emotional and procedural aspects involved. While my connection is specific to Korea, I recognize that the overarching controversy about international adoption applies across many countries, including India. My moral concern about the long-term well-being of adoptees and the ethical implications of cross-border selection underscore my participation in this community.

My current indecision is rooted in the love I have for my daughter and the positive outcomes of adoption, which makes it difficult to dismiss the practice outright. Conversely, I am disturbed by stories of adoptees who feel culturally disconnected or psychologically harmed. The high costs, complicated legal requirements, and inconsistent regulations across countries further complicate my stance. I am aware that a nuanced understanding of India’s specific policies, the conditions of children awaiting adoption, and the systemic factors influencing these processes will help clarify whether international adoption from India should continue.

To develop an informed stance, I need to investigate several aspects: the living conditions of orphans in India, the legal and ethical frameworks governing adoption, and the psychological outcomes for adoptees in the long term. Additionally, examining the societal attitudes toward adoption and the efficacy of governmental policies will be essential. I also plan to compare the current situation with other countries, assessing the effectiveness of regulations and the risks involved.

Valuable information will likely come from academic research, reports by international organizations such as UNICEF and the Indian government, and firsthand accounts from adoptive families and adoptees. I will explore scholarly articles on international adoption ethics, legal statutes in both countries, and case studies illustrating both positive and negative outcomes. Interviews and personal narratives will provide critical insights into lived experiences, helping balance statistical data with human stories. By gathering these diverse sources, I aim to construct a comprehensive view of whether the practice should be continued or discontinued in the Indian context.

References

  • Bhabha, J. (2013). Human Rights, International Adoption, and the Public Good. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 7(2), 347-382.
  • Gibson, L. (2019). Cultural Displacement and Long-term Effects of International Adoption. Journal of Child Welfare, 95, 124-139.
  • Indian Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2021). Adoption Regulations and Policies.
  • Jacobsen, M. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas in International Adoption. Global Bioethics, 31(4), 226-240.
  • UNICEF. (2022). Child Protection and Adoption Systems in India. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/india/reports/child-protection
  • United States Department of State. (2023). Intercountry Adoption Statistics. Retrieved from https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption.html
  • Venkatesh, S. (2018). Adoption and Identity: Navigating Cultural Displacement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 45-59.
  • Weitz, R. (2014). The Ethics of International Adoption. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 233-250.
  • Yates, T. (2020). Legal Frameworks and Adoption Practices in India. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 345-361.
  • Zhang, X. (2021). The Psychological Impact of Origin Disconnection in International Adoptees. Developmental Psychology, 57(3), 389-401.

Related Assignments