Research Paper Guide For History 1301 And 1302

Research Paper Guidehistory 1301 1302your Nameyour Research Paper Head

Your research paper should include the following elements:

• The paper must be double-spaced and typed or word-processed.
• Use font sizes no smaller than 8 and no larger than 12.
• The first paragraph should clearly define the Who, What, When, and Where of the subject in 2-4 concise sentences.
• The third paragraph should describe the methods ("How") of how the effort or action was undertaken, with at least three distinct "how" sentences, each starting a new paragraph.
• The fourth paragraph should detail the "Result" according to a secondary source.
• The fifth paragraph should describe the "Why" of the event or action, citing a second college-level primary source, avoiding encyclopedias or dictionaries, with emphasis on academic sources ending in edu, gov, org, or lib, and excluding Wikipedia.
• The sixth paragraph should present the "How" from the second source, in the order provided by the source, with each "how" presented as a separate sentence.
• The seventh paragraph should elaborate on the "Result" as defined by the second source, maintaining the structure used in the previous "Result" paragraph.
• The eighth paragraph should define the "Why" from a third primary source, following the same structure.
• The ninth paragraph should outline the "How" from the third source, in the order presented by that source.
• The tenth paragraph should describe the "Result" according to the third source, structured similarly to previous "Result" paragraphs.
• The eleventh paragraph should contain your interpretation of the resources, indicating which source most accurately reflects your understanding or explaining why none of them fully do, summarized in no more than two sentences.
• The twelfth paragraph should defend your interpretation, providing three reasons for your choice and two reasons why the other sources were less effective, incorporating data from both sources.
• Your paper should be between five and ten pages, focused, and clearlydefine reasons for your choices. Use concise language and straightforward interpretations to ensure clarity. The paper demands critical thinking and personal analysis based on your research.

Paper For Above instruction

The research paper on the assigned historical topic requires a structured critical analysis using multiple credible sources. The initial step involves succinctly introducing the subject by answering Who, What, When, and Where in a brief paragraph of 2-4 sentences, providing essential context with clarity and grammatical accuracy. This establishes a foundation for the subsequent analysis and ensures the reader comprehends the scope of the topic.

The core of the paper involves a detailed examination of the processes (the "How") surrounding the event or effort. According to the instruction, at least three "How" sentences are necessary to describe how the event or effort was undertaken. Each "How" should be clearly articulated, beginning a new paragraph to facilitate clarity and focus. This methodological description must be based on secondary sources, ideally peer-reviewed or academically reputable materials.

The next component involves elucidating the "Result" as per secondary sources. This includes describing the outcomes or impacts of the event or action, again structured as a standalone paragraph. Following this, the paper must explore the "Why" — the reasons or motivations behind the event or effort — citing an appropriate primary source. It is critical to avoid non-academic sources such as dictionaries, encyclopedias, or Wikipedia. The secondary source used for "Why" should be a credible college-level publication ending in .edu, .gov, .org, or .lib.

Subsequently, the paper proceeds to analyze the "How" as detailed in the second primary source, presented in the order given by the source. Each "How" is expressed in a separate sentence, reflecting the sequence of actions or reasons provided, which influences the overall interpretation of the event. The next step repeats this pattern for the "Result" from the second source, followed by the "Why" from a third source, each structured equivalently.

The following paragraphs focus on the "How" and "Result" from the third source, ensuring consistency in the presentation format. Finally, the student must interpret the gathered information by expressing a reasoned judgment about which source most accurately reflects the true nature of the event or effort, or acknowledge if none fully capture the complexity. This reflection is limited to two sentences.

The concluding paragraph forms a defense of that interpretation. It should provide at least three reasons supporting the choice of the primary source deemed most accurate and two reasons why alternative sources fall short, demonstrating critical analysis and integrative thinking.

This entire process aims to develop a comprehensive, well-structured, and critically engaged research paper, approximately five to ten pages long, relying on credible academic sources and expressing original interpretation. Clear, concise language and logical organization are essential for effective communication and scholarly rigor.

References

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the book or article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. URL or publisher.
• Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the secondary source. Publisher or Journal, URL.
• Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the third primary source. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, D. D. (Year). Additional credible source. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, E. E. (Year). Additional academic reference. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, F. F. (Year). Further scholarly work on the topic. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, G. G. (Year). Related historical analysis. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, H. H. (Year). Critical perspective on the subject. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, I. I. (Year). Supplementary academic resource. Journal or Publisher, URL.
• Author, J. J. (Year). Concluding scholarly commentary. Journal or Publisher, URL.