Research Papers Must Be Typed, Or Word Processed, And Refere

Research papers must be typed, or word processed, and referenced as per VIT guidelines

Research papers must be typed, or word processed, and referenced as per VIT guidelines. A variety of references from textbooks, journal articles and the internet would be well regarded. There should be headings, an introduction (not more than 10% of the total) and a conclusion (not more than 10% of the total).

Paper For Above instruction

This assignment requires the preparation of a research report that critically analyzes a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article. The total length of the report should be between 2800 and 3000 words, with an emphasis on clarity, relevance, and scholarly rigor. The report should include a clear structure with appropriate headings, an introduction not exceeding 10% of the total word count, and a conclusion also limited to 10%. Proper referencing must be employed throughout, adhering to the VIT guidelines, and sources should include textbooks, journal articles, and credible internet sources.

The core tasks involve selecting a research article that contains comprehensive sections such as Method, Results, and Discussion. The student should clearly identify and list the research question(s) or hypotheses addressed in the article. A concise summary of the study must be provided, highlighting the purpose and significance of the research. The methodology, including the research design, should be described in detail, evaluating whether the chosen method was appropriate for addressing the research questions. If the method is deemed unsuitable, suggestions for alternative approaches should be proposed. Additionally, the variables involved in the study must be described, including their operational definitions and how they were measured or manipulated.

An essential aspect of the report is the ethical evaluation of the research. The student should analyze whether the study adheres to ethical standards, considering elements such as participant consent, confidentiality, and risk mitigation. The discussion must be supported by scholarly sources to provide a nuanced critique of the ethical considerations involved.

The paper should demonstrate critical thinking, cohesive argumentation, and effective academic writing. Proper organization, including a well-developed thesis, logical progression of ideas, and a compelling conclusion, are crucial for success. Mechanical correctness, appropriate formatting, and proper citation of sources are mandatory, following the APA style guide.

Guidelines Summary

  • Selection of a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article with complete Method, Results, and Discussion sections
  • Analysis covering research questions/hypotheses, study summary, methodology, variables, and ethics
  • Word count: 750–1,000 words
  • Use of credible scholarly sources and proper APA referencing
  • Focus on critical evaluation and scholarly argumentation

Reference for writing and evaluation standards

Ensure to use scholarly journal articles from the library, applying critical analysis as instructed. Follow APA guidelines meticulously for citations and referencing, and craft the report to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of research methodology and ethical considerations in psychology.

References

  1. Babbie, E. (2013). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
  2. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  3. Craig, R. T., & Sigal, S. (2018). Scholarship and Research in Communication. Routledge.
  4. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage Publications.
  5. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
  6. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.
  7. Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design. In J. F. Gubrium (Ed.), Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Sage.
  8. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Miller, F. G., & Rosenstein, D. (2010). Ethical issues in psychological research. In J. W. Van den Bos & J. K. Van Laar (Eds.), Ethical Dilemmas in Psychology: A Practical Guide (pp. 43–66). Routledge.
  10. Morling, B. (2017). Research Methods in Psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.

Related Assignments