Research Project Part One: Context And Major Assignments

Research Project Part One Contextstwo Major Assignments Comprise

Research Project Part One: Contexts (CP) requires you to research and utilize various sources to describe, contextualize, and analyze a significant contemporary political, social, or cultural problem. You are to summarize and evaluate debates among credible scholars, thinkers, and organizations about your topic. This expository writing aims to describe your central problem and explain its relevance through contextualization, including historical, rhetorical, social, political, economic, and environmental perspectives.

You should research the historical contexts, laws, legal precedents, institutional practices, and trends shaping the problem’s development. Recognize how different communities or disciplines frame the issue differently and analyze these perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding. Concurrently, develop a Working Annotated Bibliography by summarizing and analyzing your sources, aiming to evaluate their credibility and relevance.

Questions to guide your research include: What harm does the problem cause? Why does it exist? How and when did it develop? Who benefits from it? Who is engaging with the issue publicly? Your process work should include topic development, proposals, and multiple drafts. These preliminary steps are essential for eligibility to submit the final draft.

Your research must involve a broad and varied selection of sources, including primary and secondary materials, scholarship, journalism, policy papers, reports, case law, and other relevant sources. The final Part One submission will be a multimodal composition of approximately 1000 words, formatted according to MLA standards, with parenthetical citations, a Works Cited page, and a descriptive academic title. The final product must clearly demonstrate your understanding of the context surrounding your chosen problem, integrating evidence ethically and effectively.

Paper For Above instruction

The ongoing crisis of climate change exemplifies how historical, political, and social contexts intertwine to shape contemporary environmental challenges. To fully grasp the magnitude of this issue, it is essential to explore its development through a multi-dimensional lens, considering not only scientific data but also the legal frameworks, policy debates, and societal attitudes that influence policymaking and public perception. Historically, the recognition of climate change as a significant threat emerged during the late 20th century, rooted in scientific discoveries about greenhouse gases and global warming (McKibben, 1989). These early scientific findings sparked debates within governmental and scientific communities about mitigation strategies and economic implications, shaping the legal and institutional responses we see today. Legislation such as the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 and subsequent international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol illustrate how policy has evolved as societies attempt to grapple with environmental urgency (U.S. EPA, 2020).

Furthermore, different communities articulate the stakes of climate change from diverse perspectives. Environmental organizations emphasize the ecological harm and future risks to biodiversity, advocating for aggressive emissions reductions. Conversely, industry groups and some political figures often frame climate policies as threats to economic growth and job security, leading to public debates that hinge on economic versus environmental priorities (Jasanoff, 2010). Understanding these conflicting narratives is vital to contextualizing the resistance and support for various policies. Additionally, the rhetoric used by journalists and politicians reveals underlying ideological positions, highlighting the importance of rhetorical analysis in or understanding of the controversy.

The social implications of climate change are equally profound, particularly for vulnerable communities experiencing disproportionate impacts. Low-income and marginalized populations often face heightened exposure to environmental hazards without adequate support or resources, making the issue not only scientific but deeply social and ethical (Bullard, 2000). This confluence of scientific, legal, social, and rhetorical contexts illustrates how multiple disciplines and communities frame and respond to the problem, informing effective advocacy and policy solutions.

In sum, understanding the contemporary climate crisis requires a comprehensive exploration of its historical roots, legislative developments, societal debates, and ethical considerations. By analyzing a wide array of credible sources—scientific reports, legal case law, policy papers, and media commentary—it is possible to construct a nuanced picture of the ongoing challenge and identify pathways for meaningful change. This contextualized understanding forms the foundation for subsequent advocacy efforts and policy proposals aimed at addressing one of the most pressing issues of our time.

References

• Bullard, R. D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press.
• Jasanoff, S. (2010). Earth's environment and the American mind: The politics of climate change. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 551-571.
• McKibben, B. (1989). The End of Nature. Random House.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Climate Change Law and Policy. https://www.epa.gov/climatelaw