Research Project Review: Presenting Results And Discussion

Research Project Review: Presenting Results and Discussion Sections

This discussion Research Project Review consists of presenting your Results and Discussion sections of your Research Project and providing professional feedback to your peers. These activities will enable you to continue honing your scientific writing skills (being concise and precise) and using the systematic organization of a professional empirical paper. It forces you to consider research results within a bigger picture – how do findings fit, contradict, and expand our current understanding in the field? Try to see multiple perspectives in the interpretations to avoid confirmation bias. Sharing your research findings with the scientific and lay community is essential to expanding our understanding of mental processes and behavior, with the ultimate goal of bettering the lives of ourselves and others. Receiving and providing constructive feedback related to scientific writing is a professional skill that deepens as one’s knowledge of research methods and statistics expands. As we near the end of this course, this is your chance to illustrate your deepened understanding of these concepts.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this assignment is to review and present the Results and Discussion sections of a research project, critically analyzing the findings and contextualizing them within the broader field of study. This exercise aims to develop scientific writing skills, including clarity, conciseness, and systematic organization, while fostering a deeper understanding of research methodologies, data analysis, and interpretation of results.

Presentation of Results

The Results section should begin with a detailed description of the sample demographics, including the total sample size and relevant descriptive statistics. If the demographic variable is nominal or ordinal, percentages should be reported; if continuous, means and standard deviations are appropriate. Following this, a clear statement of the purpose of the study, the hypotheses tested, and the statistical tests used should be presented. Results should be reported in complete sentences, incorporating statistical values such as test statistics, p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes. All tables and figures must be integrated into the Results section, with tables displaying raw statistical output and figures illustrating key findings related to the hypotheses. Proper APA formatting for tables and figures should be adhered to, including appropriate labels and captions.

Discussion Components

The Discussion should open with a restatement of the research goals and a summary of the main findings, contextualizing these results in relation to the hypotheses. Limitations of the study should be critically examined, demonstrating thoughtful consideration of their potential impact on the findings. The interpretation of results should draw upon relevant literature, citing at least three scholarly articles that support or contrast the present findings, detailing how differences in sample, methodology, or instrument influence the comparison. The discussion should also reflect on the broader implications of the findings for the field, policy, or society at large. Lastly, propose a future research direction that builds on the current study, emphasizing its significance and potential contributions.

References

The References section must adhere to APA format, including at least three scholarly sources cited within the Results and Discussion. All references should be properly formatted with hanging indents, author names, publication year, titles, and source information.

Summary

In summary, this assignment involves preparing a comprehensive paper of approximately 600 words that includes the Results and Discussion sections of a research project, along with references. The paper should be well-organized, written in professional academic style with APA formatting, and contain critical analysis, contextual understanding, and proposed future directions.

References

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). Pearson.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (2012). Professional writing in psychology: Papers, posters, and presentations. American Psychological Association.
  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
  • Morling, B. (2017). Research methods in psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Silberzahn, R., et al. (2018). Unlocking the potential of team research: A discussion of key issues and opportunities. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 429–453.

Related Assignments