Research Project Week Four You Will Receive Feedback On
Research Project Week Fouryou Will Receive Feedback On The Previous We
Research Project-Week Four You will receive feedback on the previous week's assignment by Sunday 11:59pm. Before you complete your Week Four assignment, please read your instructor’s comments about your Week Three assignment, as well as this week’s lecture. Be sure to include any suggested changes in your project going forward. In a five- to six-page paper (not including the title and reference pages), provide a revised version of your introduction, research question, background research, hypothesis, research design, sampling plan, secondary data plan (if applicable), and measurement scales (if applicable). These revisions must be based on your instructor’s feedback if your instructor provided comments about these sections in Week Three.
Your plans for using observations, focus groups, interviews, or surveys, if applicable. This should include your draft version of the questions you will ask your participants. If observations or surveys would not be useful in your study, please explain why not. A reference list documented in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Your paper must be formatted according to APA style.
Paper For Above instruction
The completion of a research project necessitates a meticulous revision process, especially after receiving instructor feedback on prior assignments. In Week Four, students are tasked with refining various elements of their research proposal, including the introduction, research questions, background research, hypotheses, research design, sampling plan, secondary data plan, and measurement scales. These revisions must incorporate the instructor’s comments from Week Three, ensuring the research framework aligns with academic standards and addresses any identified weaknesses or gaps.
Revising the research proposal begins with the introduction, which sets the context for the study. It should clearly articulate the research problem and its significance, providing a compelling rationale that justifies the need for the research. A robust background research section should include a review of relevant literature, highlighting key theories, past findings, and existing gaps that the current study aims to fill. Incorporating instructor feedback here might involve clarifying or expanding on the literature that frames the research question, ensuring it is grounded in current theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence.
The research question itself must be precise, feasible, and aligned with the study's objectives. Any feedback may suggest narrowing or broadening the scope, or reframing the question for clarity. The hypothesis, which should be testable and based on the background research, might require adjustments to reflect the refined research focus. Likewise, the research design must be appropriate to answer the revised research question, whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. The design should specify data collection strategies, analysis methods, and any considerations for validity and reliability.
The sampling plan should detail how participants will be selected to ensure representativeness and ethical considerations are addressed. If applicable, the secondary data plan must outline sources of existing data, how it will be used, and any limitations. Measurement scales need to be clearly defined if they are part of the study, ensuring they are valid and reliable measures of the constructs involved. Adjustments to these elements should be justified based on instructor feedback and current best practices in research methodology.
In addition to revising the core research components, students must articulate their plans for data collection instruments, including observations, focus groups, interviews, or surveys. This section should include draft questions for participants, demonstrating how the instruments align with the research objectives. If certain methods are deemed unsuitable for the study, a well-reasoned explanation should be provided.
The final part of the assignment involves correctly documenting all sources in APA citation style, ensuring adherence to academic integrity standards. Proper formatting throughout the paper is crucial, including correctly structured headings, citations, and references.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th ed.). Pearson.
- Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Silverman, D. (2017). Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.