Research Proposal Vickie Murphy Grand Canyon Universi 877851

Research Proposal Vickie Murphy Grand Canyon University 04/23/2018

Social cognition research focuses on how our thoughts impact our behaviors and emotions. It provides societal insights into the processes that underpin social interactions and offers solutions to societal issues. Initiated mainly in the 1980s following the cognitive revolution, social cognition studies illuminate the power and pitfalls embedded within human social thinking. Humans, as social beings, continually strive to make sense of their world through shared perceptions and establishing relationships. Their thoughts can be biased, minimal, or elaborate depending on situational demands and motives. Human judgment often occurs automatically or unconsciously, not due to stupidity or laziness but because these processes are essential for efficiency. Just as breathing occurs without conscious effort, so do many cognitive activities, allowing attention to focus on complex tasks.

Several theories describe universal human processes such as attribution theory, suggesting that individual behaviors are influenced by internal and external attributions. These judgments are often automatic but can be corrected through reflective processes. Research in social cognition helps promote motivation and reduce negative stereotypes' impacts. It has also contributed to treatments for mental health conditions like major depression and PTSD by understanding distorted thought patterns. This body of research highlights how individuals evaluate themselves and others in context—such as choosing friends, employment, or mates—by interpreting social cues and behaviors.

This paper explores how social cognition employs systematic procedures to analyze decision-making and assessments made about oneself and others. It emphasizes how interpretation, recall, and attention to social information are influenced by motives, moods, culture, recent thoughts, and attitudes. Understanding the degree of conscious thought involved in judgments is vital, along with identifying key social cognition concepts and critical issues. Researchers must pay attention to observable behaviors and reliably label them for clear communication, hypothesis development, and validity testing.

The study focuses on five basic human needs—belonging, understanding, managing, self-enhancing, and trust—and their roles in motivation and social judgment. These needs drive individuals toward social cohesion, information sharing, control, self-worth, and faith in others. Such needs, although universal, manifest differently across cultures, affecting social behavior and decision-making. For instance, individualistic societies like the United States promote independence, whereas collectivist cultures emphasize harmony and group achievements.

Belonging fosters stable relationships, underpins motivations, and influences behaviors aimed at social integration. Cultural norms influence how these needs are prioritized and expressed, impacting perceptions and actions. For example, conformity to cultural norms facilitates social cohesion but may also lead to in-group favoritism or bias. Managing behavior to maintain a sense of control and believing in a just-world are also central. Internal control sources enhance proactive behavior and resilience, whereas external control perceptions often correlate with passivity and external attribution of outcomes.

Conscious and unconscious thoughts significantly influence behavior. Magical thinking can satisfy needs for predictability and control in uncertain environments. Individuals with internal locus of control tend to believe they can effect change, which motivates challenge-seeking behaviors, contrasting with those perceiving outcomes as independent of effort. Social cognition shapes these beliefs and behaviors, influencing how individuals perceive and interact within their social worlds.

Methods

The research will employ experimental methods to manipulate causal variables and observe individual behaviors. Participants will include five individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds, selected randomly to explore cultural influences on social cognition. Their demographic details, such as occupations, will also be recorded to understand contextual factors. Questionnaires will serve as primary instruments, capturing self-reported data on perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors. Additionally, discreetly placed cameras will record behavior in naturalistic settings to observe genuine interactions and responses. This combination aims to provide comprehensive data on how social cognition impacts decision-making and social behavior across cultures.

Procedure

Participants will be recruited through random sampling. They will answer structured questions either verbally or in writing. Each will be assigned tasks designed to evoke social responses, monitored via hidden cameras to observe spontaneous reactions. Following task completion, they will write responses to a quiz evaluating their perceptions and attitudes. Data will be analyzed based on responses and observed behaviors, focusing on patterns related to the five basic needs and cultural influences.

Design

The study will adopt a correlational research design, examining relationships between variables within the same participant group. This approach facilitates understanding of how thinking patterns and behaviors are interconnected across different individuals. By analyzing the correlations, the research will identify regularities or differences in social cognition patterns influenced by culture and personal motives, using statistical methods such as ANOVA to assess significant relationships.

Results

The expected outcome is evidence that social cognition significantly influences individual behaviors and decision-making processes. Specifically, the data should demonstrate correlations between cultural background, perceived needs satisfaction, and behavioral responses. The ANOVA analysis will assess how consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness contribute to attribution processes, illuminating how individuals assign causes to behavior. Significance in results would confirm that social cognition mechanisms are central in shaping social judgments, moving beyond chance explanations.

Discussion

If the results show significance, it would suggest that social cognition plays a crucial role in explaining human behavior systematically. A significant relationship indicates that social judgments are not random but are influenced by external and internal cues, cultural norms, and motivational needs. Conversely, non-significant findings would imply that other factors may have a stronger influence or that the measures used were insufficient. Ethically, the research will adhere to APA guidelines by informing participants of the study's purpose, ensuring voluntary participation, and maintaining confidentiality. They will be free to withdraw at any time without penalty.

However, potential limitations include difficulty recruiting diverse participants, especially from cultures less accessible or willing to participate. Cultural misunderstandings could lead to skewed data or misinterpretation, affecting validity. Despite these challenges, this study aims to contribute valuable insights into how social cognition underpins social behavior and decision-making across cultures, with implications for Psychology, sociology, and behavioral sciences.

References

• Augoustinos, M. (2014). Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction. SAGE.
• Barcharts, I. (2015). APA Guidelines. Barcharts, Incorporated.
• Donohew, L. (2015). Communication, Social Cognition, and Affect (PLE: Emotion). Psychology Press.
• Gawronski, B. (2012). Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. Guilford Press.
• Gorard, S. (2013). Research Design: Creating Robust Approaches for the Social Sciences. Sage.
• Myers, J. L. (2013). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Routledge.
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2009). Communication and Social Cognition: Theories and Methods. Routledge.
• Sommerville, J. (2016). Social Cognition: Development Across the Life Span. Psychology Press.
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social Cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Deaux, K., & Lloyd, C. (2018). Social Psychology of Identity. Routledge.