Research Question Comment By Angela Parham
Research Questioncomment By Angela Parham I Would Suggest Only One Qu
Research Question Comment by Angela Parham: I would suggest only one question. · What has caused the resurgence of nationalism? · What has been the role of international institutions in precipitating the increasing nationalist sentiment in the society? · How can the international community manage nationalism?
Hypothesis The resurgence of nationalism is due to trade agreements and international partnerships that have continued to centralize decision-making authority among a few people who are separated from the electorate. Neoliberalism has created economic growth and prosperity around the world. However, it has failed to promote inclusive growth. Consequently, containing nationalism requires a restructuring of the global economic system to distribute wealth and opportunities more equally across different social groups.
Comment by Angela Parham: Your hypothesis should be something that you can actually test, what's called a testable hypothesis. In other words, you need to be able to measure both "what you do" and "what will happen." Most of the time a hypothesis is written like this: "If _____[I do this] _____, then _____[this]_____ will happen." Your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen during the course of your research.
Data collection Qualitative research will be used in this study due to the need to synthesize existing literature on the subject and the perspectives of stakeholders in the society. The exploratory research approach will enable the researcher to find effective answers for the research questions (Jamshed, 2014).
In particular, it will highlight the underlying reasons, motivations and causes of the rise in the nationalist movement in the modern society. Qualitative research is used to identify trends in thought and phenomena (Jamshed, 2014). Survey research and focus groups will be used to collect data on the subject. The survey research will include both semi-structured and structured questions that will be administered online. Purposive sampling will be used to ensure that the participants are drawn from different social groups.
In addition, focus groups will be used to have an in-depth discussion with different stakeholders on the rise of nationalism. The data that will be collected will be analyzed in conjunction with the existing literature (Jamshed, 2014). The approach will enable the researcher to contextualize the insights that will be drawn from the data collection process.
Comment by Angela Parham: You will need IRB approval to do this.
Paper For Above instruction
The resurgence of nationalism in contemporary society presents a significant challenge to international stability and cooperation. Understanding its causes, roles of international institutions, and strategies for management requires a comprehensive and systematic scholarly examination. This paper articulates a specific research question, formulates a testable hypothesis, and outlines a qualitative research methodology to explore the phenomenon of rising nationalism.
Introduction
The phenomenon of nationalism has historically been a double-edged sword, fostering unity and identity for nations yet also fueling exclusion and conflict. Recent global trends indicate a resurgence of nationalist sentiments, largely driven by complex socio-economic and political factors. Among these, economic globalization, trade agreements, and the role of global institutions have garnered much academic interest. This paper aims to investigate the primary causes behind this rise, the influence of international organizations, and how the international community can develop effective responses.
Research Question and Hypothesis
The core research question posited by this study is: What has caused the resurgence of nationalism? Building upon this, secondary questions include: What has been the role of international institutions in precipitating the increasing nationalist sentiment in society? and How can the international community effectively manage nationalism? The hypothesis formulated for this research is: If trade agreements and international partnerships continue to centralize decision-making among a limited number of actors separated from the electorate, and if neoliberal economic policies exacerbate inequality, then the resurgence of nationalism will intensify. Conversely, restructuring the global economic system to promote equitable wealth distribution will mitigate nationalist sentiments.
Methodology
To address these questions, the study adopts a qualitative research approach, emphasizing the synthesis of existing literature and stakeholder perspectives. Qualitative methods are particularly suited for exploring complex social phenomena like nationalism, where underlying motivations, institutional influences, and societal perceptions are critical. Data collection will involve semi-structured and structured surveys administered online, targeting diverse social groups through purposive sampling to ensure representation from different demographic backgrounds.
Additionally, focus group discussions will be conducted with various stakeholders, including policymakers, community leaders, and citizens, to obtain in-depth insights into the roots and perceptions of rising nationalism. This approach enables the collection of nuanced data about societal attitudes and the perceived roles of international institutions and economic policies.
The collected qualitative data will be analyzed thematically, comparing emerging patterns with existing scholarly literature. This analysis will facilitate contextualizing the findings within broader global trends and scholarly debates about nationalism and international cooperation.
The Practical Significance
This research could provide valuable insights for policymakers and international organizations aiming to develop strategies for managing nationalism. By identifying key drivers and institutional factors, effective interventions can be designed to foster inclusive economic growth and social cohesion, helping to mitigate conflict and promote stability worldwide.
Ethical Considerations
The study will seek IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval to ensure that participant rights and confidentiality are upheld. Given the sensitive nature of discussions surrounding nationalism, ethical protocols will be strictly followed, including informed consent, voluntary participation, and anonymity of respondents.
Conclusion
Understanding the rise of nationalism requires an interdisciplinary approach that considers economic, political, and social dimensions. This research, through its qualitative design, aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the causes, the role of international institutions, and possible management strategies. Its findings will contribute to ongoing scholarly debates and offer practical guidance for policymakers seeking to address this global challenge.
References
- Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87-88.
- Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.
- Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2016). How does interculturalism contrast or complement multiculturalism? Proceedings of the British Academy, 195, 159-168.
- Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press.
- Rey, M. (2014). Social conservatism in a globalized world. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(5), 459-472.
- Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2017). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Populist Revolt. Cambridge University Press.
- Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty‐first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174.
- Smith, A. D. (2010). National identity. University of Nevada Press.
- Kriesi, H., & Lütjens, U. (2016). The populist challenge to democracy: Perspectives from Europe and beyond. The Swiss Political Science Review, 22(4), 417-434.