Research Scenario: The Research Methods Course Instructor As ✓ Solved
Research Scenario: The Research Methods Course Instructor Asked
Review this assignment, submitted by a fictitious course learner. Research Scenario Assignment [DOCX]. Indicate what went wrong by selecting the correct response from the drop-down menu. In the text box, provide a brief narrative of 3–4 sentences that evaluates the learner’s response and provide a rationale for your correction. If you decide that the statement is correct, state why you agree with their approach.
Competencies Measured: By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria: analysis of research methodology; evaluation of qualitative and quantitative approaches; evaluation of literature review; evaluation of theory, introduction, and purpose statement; assessment of ethical considerations; and scholarly communication in APA style.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
The research scenario presented involves assessing a student's submission related to a course assignment that requires reviewing sections from a research methods course and evaluating the student's understanding and application of research concepts, specifically focusing on the topic of first-generation college students and resilience at a four-year university. The task involves identifying errors in the student’s response and providing a critical evaluation that includes a rationale for correction or approval, emphasizing adherence to research methodology principles and ethical standards.
The student’s submission should demonstrate a comprehensive analysis of research methodology, addressing both qualitative and quantitative approaches as applicable. An effective response would evaluate the appropriateness of each methodology within the context of the scenario, considering how each approach explores resilience among first-generation students at a university setting. For example, a qualitative approach might involve interviews or focus groups to gather in-depth insights, whereas a quantitative method could include surveys measuring resilience levels across a larger sample.
In evaluating the student’s work, the instructor must consider whether the rationale aligns with accepted research practices. If the student identified errors—such as conflating methodology types, misinterpreting research purpose, or neglecting ethical considerations—the instructor should select the correct response from the drop-down menu, indicating what went wrong. The accompanying narrative should succinctly explain the reasoning, such as pointing out how a proposed method fails to address research validity, reliability, or ethical compliance.
A correct student response might showcase an understanding of how to differentiate between methodologies, articulate the purpose of literature reviews, and adequately discuss ethical considerations like confidentiality and informed consent. If the student's work is accurate, the instructor’s feedback should affirm their correct application of principles, emphasizing clarity, scholarly tone, and adherence to APA standards in citations and formatting.
Overall, assessing this scenario involves scrutiny of how well the student integrates research methodology concepts with the specific context of students' resilience among first-generation college students. The instructor’s role is to ensure feedback fosters understanding—correcting misunderstandings and affirming sound reasoning—to promote mastery of research skills essential for scholarly inquiry.
References
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
- Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage publications.
- Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
- Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).