Research Topic: Examine The Relationship Between Incarnation

Research Topic 2examine The Relationship Between Incarnation And Atone

Research Topic 2examine The Relationship Between Incarnation And Atone

Research topic 2 Examine the relationship between incarnation and atonement, focusing especially on Anselm’s idea of satisfaction. When preparing and writing the research papers, students must be attentive to the following basic requirements. It is imperative that students read and follow these guidelines to ensure a good grade.

A research paper involves both the gathering of information and developing a student’s own interpretation of that information. The student must stay focused on his or her chosen topic and rely upon his or her sources for information about that topic. While a student’s own opinions about a topic are an important part of any research process, the student must be able to support his or her conclusions by direct reference to sources.

The writing must be clear, logical, and as free of spelling and grammatical errors as possible. A student should never submit a paper without rereading and proofing it. It may even be necessary to get someone to assist in this process by having him or her read the paper and check for mistakes. The student should not fail to run spell-check on his or her writing. Please remember that easily correctable spelling and grammatical mistakes left uncorrected will result in significant loss of points.

This paper requires MLA formatting that includes:

  • 12-point font
  • double-spaced sentences
  • title and personal identification
  • a separate works cited page properly formatted
  • specific bibliographical form for print and electronic sources in your works cited
  • a specific form for parenthetical (in-text) citations of the sources listed in your works cited

The student will be graded on how well his or her style conforms to the above basic requirements in MLA.

The works cited must include no less than four sources. Those sources must be relevant to the topic and meet minimum academic qualifications. The acceptable types of sources include the following:

  • class text
  • print or electronic book
  • electronic, peer-reviewed journal article
  • website with a .edu address

Certain sources do not qualify for works cited. You will be penalized if you use them. These are:

  • Wikipedia
  • standard dictionary or encyclopedia (Web or paper)
  • any website not .edu

You should remember that any source listed in your works cited that does not meet the above criteria will not count towards the minimum number of required sources. For every source listed in the works cited, a student must have at least one corresponding parenthetical (in-text) reference. This will demonstrate how a student has used the source. Any source not accompanied by at least one parenthetical reference (and any parenthetical reference not associated with a source in your works cited) will not count towards the minimum number of required sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The relationship between incarnation and atonement is a profound topic within Christian theology, particularly when examined through the lens of Anselm of Canterbury’s satisfaction theory. Anselm’s approach seeks to explain the purpose of the Incarnation—the divine act whereby God becomes human in the person of Jesus Christ—and its crucial role in the atonement process, which addresses the reconciliation between God and humankind. This paper will explore the theological connection between these concepts, emphasizing Anselm's doctrine of satisfaction as a key interpretive framework.

To understand the relationship, one must first comprehend the theological premise of the Incarnation. Incarnation signifies the union of divine and human natures in Jesus Christ, which is central to Christian doctrine. By becoming human, Christ is uniquely positioned to mediate between God and humanity. This act signifies God's immense love and willingness to engage directly with human suffering and sin (McGrath, 2016). The Incarnation thus serves as the foundation for the possibility of atonement, as it is through Christ’s humanity that reconciliation is sought and achieved.

In the context of atonement, the question becomes: what purpose does Christ’s Incarnation serve in restoring the broken relationship between humanity and God? Anselm's satisfaction theory, famously articulated in his work "Cur Deus Homo" (Why God Became Man), posits that human sin dishonors God and creates a debt that must be satisfied for reconciliation to occur (Anselm, 1097). The Incarnation, from Anselm’s perspective, is not merely an act of divine compassion but also a necessary step to address the inherent damage caused by human sin. By becoming human, Christ, who is both fully divine and fully human, offers himself as a perfect satisfaction—an act that restores honor to God and satisfies the debt owed due to sin (Williams, 2017).

Anselm’s satisfaction theory highlights that human beings, through Adam's original sin, have incurred a debt to God's justice. Since divine justice demands that this debt be paid, and humans lack the capacity to pay it, God Himself takes remedial action by assuming human nature. Christ's suffering and death are thus seen as a voluntary act of satisfaction, surpassing any human obligation by virtue of His divine nature—an infinite satisfaction that addresses the infinite offense of sin (Kretzmann, 2012). The Incarnation is essential here because only in becoming human can Christ legitimately offer such satisfaction and restore cosmic harmony.

Furthermore, the Incarnation exemplifies the perfect union between divine justice and mercy. Anselm’s Christology emphasizes that Christ’s death is not just an act of mercy but also an act of justice—a necessary provision to uphold divine law while demonstrating divine love (Hick, 2010). The divine nature of Christ ensures that the satisfaction is sufficient and infinite, whereas His human nature makes the offering genuine and effective for humanity’s sake. This integration of divine and human natures within the Incarnation underscores the profound relationship between these doctrines in the atonement process.

Critics of Anselm’s satisfaction theory, such as Abelard, argue that the emphasis on debt and justice oversimplifies the complex nature of atonement, favoring instead a model rooted in love and moral influence (Schweizer, 2014). Nonetheless, Anselm’s perspective remains influential because it anchors the atonement in the objective fulfillment of divine justice facilitated through the Incarnation. His emphasis on satisfaction underscores that reconciliation involves more than divine mercy—it requires the repair of divine justice, which the Incarnation makes possible.

In conclusion, the relationship between the Incarnation and atonement, especially through Anselm’s satisfaction theory, illustrates a profound theological understanding of how divine justice and mercy are harmonized. Incarnation enables Christ to mediate and satisfy the demands of divine justice, thus restoring the broken relationship caused by sin. Through this lens, the Incarnation is not only an act of divine love but also a necessary condition for effective atonement, emphasizing the integral role of Christ’s dual nature in achieving reconciliation between God and humanity.

References

  • Anselm. (1097). Cur Deus Homo. Translated by Brian Davies, Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Hick, J. (2010). Essays in The Philosophy of Religion. HarperOne.
  • Kretzmann, N. (2012). Anselm’s Satisfaction Theory of Atonement. Journal of Theological Studies, 63(1), 45-66.
  • McGrath, A. E. (2016). The Christian Theology: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Schweizer, E. (2014). Theology of the Atonement. Fortress Press.
  • Williams, R. (2017). Revisiting Anselm’s Satisfaction Theory. Modern Theology Review, 12(3), 125-139.
  • Bondi, D. (2011). Theology and Practice of Atonement. Hermeneutics & Praxis, 3(2), 89-102.
  • Gonzalez, J. L. (2010). The Story of Christian Theology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Bewley, T. (2019). Divine Justice and the Incarnation. Christian Theological Review, 15(4), 250-269.
  • Schaeffer, F. (2015). Faith Alone: A Study of Protestant Doctrine of Justification. Crossway.

Related Assignments