Research Topic Selection Brittany Silva University Of Phoeni ✓ Solved

2 Research Topic Selection Brittany Silva University Of Phoenix

The topic of capital punishment has been selected for my analysis to establish the impact of capital punishment on the occurrence of capital offenses. This will be achieved through analyzing the punishments enacted, the frequency of such punishments in the justice department, and the distribution among the states. It is also a minor case scenario where capital punishment sentences are used given that most cases in the United States are punishable through imprisonment. Based on the data analyzed from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, it is evident that there is a significant number of offenders who are sentenced to death.

Analyzing the topic will also help in determining the number of cases of capital offenses that are subject to capital punishment. This will be a starting point of determining the effectiveness of the justice system given that the court must implement certain procedural stages in sentencing a death sentence. Once a person is accused or convicted of a capital offense against the United States, a separate hearing is held during which a jury will consider increasing or relieving the factors defined by the federal law. The jury must determine the weight of the aggravating factors and the mitigating factors to settle on which outweighs the other.

The aggregating factors must be greater than the mitigating factors. The topic of capital punishment will be used to determine the rate of capital punishment cases in the 50 states in the United States, as the federal law allows each jurisdiction to determine the offenses that are punishable through death sentence. For instance, in Alabama, capital punishment is sentenced for intentional murder with 12 aggravating factors, while in Arizona, treason and capital murder constitute a capital offense punishable by death. Various states differ in the principles for committing the offense; however, most revolve around murder, either first-degree or capital murder.

Through analysis of various jurisdictions, it will be possible to determine the contributing factors and correlations between states and capital offenses. The topic will assist in determining cases solved concerning federal capital offenses, which differ from individual jurisdiction offenses such as civil rights violations resulting in death. Additionally, it will help determine whether there was extreme use of power in determining the offenses punishable by capital punishment based on their frequency in different jurisdictions. Another reason for choosing this topic is to explore the methods used in executing individuals charged with capital offenses, such as lethal injection, where three drugs are combined: pancuronium bromide, potassium chloride, and midazolam.

This method has gained popularity among capital punishment methods over the years. Other execution methods to investigate include electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and nitrogen hypoxia. Analyzing these methods will reveal whether jurisdictions comply with laws established for capital punishment. Federal sentences on capital punishment are governed by 28 C.F.R Part 26. Furthermore, the topic will help analyze the trends of capital punishment cases over the years and the contributing factors to any observed changes.

The research questions can be derived from the dependent and independent variables. The independent variables in this study are capital punishment, analyzed across three aspects: distribution, causes, and methods. Distribution seeks to determine how capital punishment is distributed among various states in the U.S. The second aspect examines the causes of capital punishment, like the capital offenses committed, aiming to find common factors across the states used as benchmarks for capital punishments. The third element focuses on the execution methods used and how they impact the recurrence of capital offenses, assessing whether these methods act as deterrents to potential offenders.

To explore these factors, the following hypothesis will be tested: Null hypothesis: Capital punishment does not impact the occurrence of capital offenses in the United States; Alternate hypothesis: Capital punishment has an impact on the occurrence of capital offenses in the United States. The decision criteria to either confirm or reject the hypotheses involve analyzing survey results to determine correlations between capital punishment and capital offenses.

Paper For Above Instructions

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has been a contentious issue within the American legal system for decades. This research aims to analyze the impacts of capital punishment on the occurrence of capital offenses in the United States. Various perspectives, statistical data, and legal frameworks will be examined to comprehend the multifaceted relationship between sentencing practices and crime rates.

The first component of this analysis involves understanding the historical and legal context of capital punishment in the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on numerous cases regarding the constitutionality and application of the death penalty, specifically emphasizing issues related to due process, cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment, and arbitrary application (Steiker & Steiker, 2016). Notably, landmark cases like Furman v. Georgia (1972) and Gregg v. Georgia (1976) shaped the modern landscape of capital punishment and highlighted the discrepancies in its implementation across different jurisdictions.

Statistical evidence reveals that the use of capital punishment varies significantly among states, not only in terms of frequency but also in the methods employed for executions. As noted by the Death Penalty Information Center (2021), states such as Texas and Florida actively utilize the death penalty, whereas others like California have moratoriums in place. This discrepancy prompts further inquiry into how state-specific laws and societal attitudes toward crime influence the rates of capital offenses and the imposition of the death penalty.

Analyzing the distribution of capital punishment across states brings forth crucial insights. Each state in the U.S. has the autonomy to legislate its capital offenses and sentencing procedures, leading to a patchwork of laws that can significantly affect sentencing outcomes (Baker et al., 2020). For example, states may vary in their definitions of capital offenses, the weight of aggravating and mitigating factors, and procedural requirements for capital trials. This variability raises questions about fairness and consistency in the application of capital punishment.

Moreover, the relationship between capital punishment and the deterrence of crime warrants examination. The core of the debate lies in whether the imposition of the death penalty acts as a deterrent to potential offenders. A report by the National Institute of Justice (2016) indicates that while some studies suggest a deterrent effect exists, others find no statistically significant relationship between capital punishment and lower rates of homicide or violent crime. This inconclusiveness challenges policymakers to weigh the ethical implications of capital punishment against its purported benefits.

Another important area of investigation is the methods of execution authorized by various states. The predominant method in recent years has been lethal injection, which has been marketed as a more humane option. However, this method has faced criticism concerning its efficacy and ethical implications, especially due to highly publicized botched executions (ACLU, 2018). Other methods, including electrocution, gas chamber, and firing squad, face similar scrutiny regarding their compliance with ethical standards and the Eighth Amendment's prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.

As the analysis proposes to explore the impact of capital punishment on capital offenses through various angles, developing a hypothesis is crucial. The null hypothesis posits that capital punishment does not impact the occurrence of capital offenses, while the alternate hypothesis argues that it does. Empirical data from jurisdictions with and without the death penalty will be instrumental in testing these hypotheses, guiding future judicial reforms and public policy. Examining the factors influencing capital offenses will substantiate or refute the proposed hypotheses through logical, statistic-backed conclusions.

In conclusion, the intricate relationship between capital punishment and capital offenses requires careful analysis and consideration of various factors, including legal frameworks, social attitudes, and empirical evidence. This research will contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the death penalty's effectiveness and ethical implications, ensuring an informed discussion for policymakers, practitioners, and the public.

References

  • ACLU. (2018). The Trouble with Lethal Injection. Retrieved from [ACLU website]
  • Baker, T., Morris, A., & Thompson, J. (2020). Capital Punishment: A Study of Jurisdictional Variability. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 110(3), 597-631.
  • Death Penalty Information Center. (2021). Facts About the Death Penalty. Retrieved from [DPIC website]
  • National Institute of Justice. (2016). The Deterrent Effect of Punishment Revisited: A Study of the Death Penalty. Retrieved from [NIJ website]
  • Steiker, C. S., & Steiker, J. M. (2016). No Longer Missing: The Death Penalty's Uncertain Legacy. Harvard Law Review, 129(6), 1381-1453.
  • Middleton, K. (2020). Life vs. Death: The Impact of Capital Punishment on Society. Criminal Justice Review, 45(2), 141-162.
  • Radelet, M. L., & Lacock, T. L. (2009). Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates? The Views of Leading Criminologists. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(2), 489-508.
  • United States Department of Justice. (n.d.). The Federal Death Penalty Act. Retrieved from [DOJ website]
  • American Psychological Association. (2012). The Psychological Costs of Capital Punishment. American Psychologist, 67(1), 37-50.
  • Cox, A. (2020). Reassessing Deterrence: A Historical Perspective on the Death Penalty. Criminal Justice Ethics, 39(1), 72-100.

Related Assignments