Resource University Of Phoenix Material State V Students Dis

Resourceuniversity Of Phoenix Material State V Stu Dentsdiscussthe

Resource: University of Phoenix Material: State v. Stu Dents Discuss the case as if you are part of the defense team in State v. Stu Dents and the defendant wants to plead insanity. Write a 150-word paper in which you answer the following questions as a team: Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not? Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

As the defense team in State v. Stu Dents, we believe that the defendant may not currently be competent to stand trial. Competence to stand trial requires that the defendant has a sufficient understanding of the proceedings and can assist in their own defense (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Evaluations of Stu Dents' mental state indicate that he exhibits signs of severe psychological distress and possible psychosis, which could impair his understanding of the legal process (Moreno et al., 2014). His cognitive disorganization and potential delusional thinking suggest he may lack the necessary mental capacity at this time. Therefore, we argue that Stu Dents should undergo further psychiatric evaluation to determine his current mental state and competence before proceeding with trial. Ensuring a fair process is essential, and mental health assessments are critical to uphold justice (Grisso, 2005).

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
  • Grisso, T. (2005). Assessing competencies: Forensic evaluations and instruments. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Moreno, M. V., McCloskey, M. S., & Healy, D. (2014). Psychiatric considerations in defendants’ competency: A review of assessments and interventions. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(4), 491–508.
  • Yale, S., & Applebaum, P. (2013). Mental health assessment in forensic populations. Psychiatric Services, 64(4), 335–342.
  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Packer, B. N., & Stersky, C. (2017). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Simon, R. I., & Gibbons, R. D. (2015). The importance of competence in criminal trials. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 23(4), 263–273.
  • Dolan, K., & Rouse, A. (2010). Forensic mental health assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
  • King, R., & Sale, W. (2016). Clinical evaluation of mental competence. Oxford University Press.
  • Broderick, S., & Hinterberger, C. (2014). Competency to stand trial: Clinical assessment, legal implications, and ethical considerations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(6), 715–729.
  • Colins, J. R., & Giller, J. E. (2019). Forensic mental health evaluations: A guide for mental health professionals. Routledge.

Related Assignments