Resources For Social Policy And Social Programs Table
Resourcech 6 Ofsocial Policy And Social Programscreatea Table Compar
Resource: Ch. 6 of Social Policy and Social Programs Create a table comparing and contrasting the eligibility rules of two different agencies that offer the same type of program. Refer to Table 6.1 on p. 117 of the text. Select one government agency and either a private or faith-based agency that offers a program for the homeless. Do not select the same agency you chose to analyze throughout the course. Write a brief summary of what you consider the key differences between the eligibility rules of the two agencies. Post your table as an attachment.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The provision of services to the homeless is a critical element of social policy aimed at alleviating poverty and promoting social inclusion. Various agencies—governmental, private, and faith-based—offer programs to support this vulnerable population. While these agencies aim to address similar needs, their eligibility criteria often differ significantly, impacting who can access their services. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the eligibility rules of two agencies providing homelessness assistance: a government agency and a faith-based organization, highlighting the key differences and implications for policy and practice.
Overview of the Agencies
The selected government agency for this comparison is the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Continuum of Care Program (HUD, 2021). This federal program allocates funds to support local initiatives that assist the homeless and prevent homelessness. Conversely, the faith-based agency selected is the Salvation Army’s homeless assistance program, operating nationally with decentralized eligibility criteria tailored to local contexts (Salvation Army, 2023).
Eligibility Criteria Analysis
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Continuum of Care
The HUD program primarily targets families and individuals experiencing homelessness, with eligibility focusing on income and residency status (HUD, 2021). The key eligibility rules include:
- Homeless status as defined by HUD: lacking a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence or imminent risk of losing housing.
- Income at or below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI), or experiencing severe rent burden.
- Residency within the locality served by the participating agency.
- Documentation of homelessness, such as notices from landlords or service providers.
- Eligibility is generally open to anyone meeting the above criteria, with priority given to vulnerable groups such as veterans, families with children, and chronically homeless individuals.
Salvation Army Homeless Assistance Program
The Salvation Army’s eligibility criteria are somewhat more flexible but tailored to religious and community-based standards:
- Homelessness or imminent homelessness as per local definitions.
- Often prioritize individuals referred by social services or church affiliates.
- Some programs require participants to be open to spiritual support or willing to engage in faith-based activities.
- Income and residency requirements vary by local branch but are generally less restrictive, focusing more on the immediate need rather than formal documentation.
- Emphasis on community integration, with some programs requiring that participants be residents of the local community or actively engaged in church programs.
Comparison and Key Differences
The primary difference between the two agencies lies in the formality and scope of eligibility documentation. HUD's criteria are strictly defined, emphasizing income thresholds and official proof of homelessness, reflecting its federal funding source and accountability standards (HUD, 2021). In contrast, the Salvation Army adopts a more flexible, community-oriented approach, often prioritizing individuals who demonstrate a willingness to participate in faith-based activities or community programs (Salvation Army, 2023).
Another key distinction is the focus on spiritual engagement in the faith-based agency, which can influence eligibility by including behavioral or spiritual criteria not present in HUD's criteria. This inclusion can either broaden access for those committed to faith-based recovery or limit it for individuals seeking secular assistance.
Implications for Policy and Practice
The differences in eligibility rules have significant implications. Federally funded programs like HUD are designed for broad access, emphasizing transparency, equality, and data collection for accountability. Faith-based agencies, while often more flexible and community-driven, may inadvertently exclude individuals uncomfortable with spiritual components or those seeking secular support.
These differences also influence outreach strategies and service delivery. HUD programs often require extensive documentation, which can be a barrier for some homeless individuals, while faith-based programs might rely more on community referrals and personal engagement, potentially reaching different segments of the homeless population (Culhane & Metraux, 2014).
Conclusion
Understanding the contrasting eligibility criteria of different agencies aiding the homeless highlights the importance of multi-faceted approaches in social policy. While federal programs like HUD aim for broad accessibility and accountability, faith-based organizations provide alternative pathways that may offer more personalized support but come with different eligibility requirements. Policymakers should consider these differences to develop comprehensive strategies that incorporate varied access points tailored to diverse needs.
References
Culhane, D. P., & Metraux, S. (2014). Services, Housing, and Health Care for Homeless People: The Need for Integrated Models. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(1), 1-7.
HUD. (2021). Continuum of Care Program. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/aboutcoc
Salvation Army. (2023). Homeless Assistance Programs. The Salvation Army. https://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/homelessness/
Additional references would include peer-reviewed articles and government reports detailing eligibility standards and program effectiveness, exemplifying a comprehensive academic approach.