Resources: Milstead JA, Short NM, 2019 Health Policy And Pol

Question

Resourcesmilstead J A Short N M 2019health Policy And Poli Resourcesmilstead J A Short N M 2019health Policy And Poli Resources Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only). Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991. Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document). To Prepare: In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation. Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you. Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described. Post an evaluation topic and a brief description of the evaluation. Discuss how social determinants impact this issue.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

Introduction The role of nurses extends beyond bedside care into the broader societal framework of health policy and program evaluation. As policymakers and advocates, nurses can critically assess the effectiveness of healthcare programs and policies. This paper evaluates the Community Health Improvement Program (CHIP) at the state level, emphasizing their evaluation criteria, social determinants affecting outcomes, and the importance of nurse involvement in policy assessment. Description of the Healthcare Program The Community Health Improvement Program (CHIP) is a state-funded initiative aimed at improving health outcomes in underserved populations by addressing social determinants such as access to healthcare, education, housing, and socioeconomic status. CHIP focuses on preventive care, health education, and resource allocation to vulnerable communities, intending to reduce disparities and promote equitable health access. Evaluation Criteria Evaluation of CHIP involves multiple criteria, including process measures, outcome measures, and impact assessments. Process measures examine adherence to program protocols, stakeholder engagement, and service delivery efficiency. Outcome measures evaluate changes in health behaviors, morbidity and mortality rates, and healthcare utilization. Impact assessments consider long-term effects on community health status and disparities. Data sources include surveys, health records, community feedback, and statistical analyses, aligning with Glasgow et al.'s (2003) emphasis on translating research into practical health improvements. Impact of Social Determinants Social determinants greatly influence the success and challenges of CHIP. Factors like poverty, education level, housing stability, and employment opportunities directly impact health behaviors and access to care, which in turn affect program outcomes. For example, housing insecurity can hinder consistent healthcare access, reducing program effectiveness. Addressing these d

Resources: Milstead JA, Short NM, 2019 Health Policy And Pol ✓ Solved

Resourcesmilstead J A Short N M 2019health Policy And Poli

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Description of the Healthcare Program

Evaluation Criteria

Impact of Social Determinants

Conclusion

References