Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 175 Words Discuss T

Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 175 Wordsdiscuss The Differe

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Discuss the difference between economic value and social value or the shared value creation framework. (each one (economic value, social value, and shared value) should be written in a different paragraph) Why do you think organizations tend to focus on the creation of one type of value but not both? Note: This is a Strategic Management class not Finance.

Paper For Above instruction

The distinction between economic value and social value lies primarily in their objectives and impacts. Economic value refers to the tangible benefits businesses generate through profit, cost savings, and financial growth. It is quantified in monetary terms and directly linked to an organization’s financial performance, resource allocation, and shareholder returns. The primary focus is on maximizing shareholder wealth and ensuring the firm’s sustainability within competitive markets. Economic value creation often emphasizes efficiency and productivity improvements, which enhance the firm’s ability to generate revenue and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability (Porter & Kramer, 2011).

In contrast, social value encompasses the positive impacts an organization has on society and the environment. It involves improving community well-being, promoting sustainability, and fostering social equity. Social value is difficult to quantify precisely, but it can be assessed through metrics like community development, environmental preservation, and social inclusiveness. Organizations contributing social value often engage in initiatives such as fair labor practices, environmental stewardship, and philanthropic efforts, aiming to address societal issues rather than purely focusing on financial returns (Moore et al., 2012).

The shared value creation framework bridges the gap between economic and social values by emphasizing strategies that generate both simultaneously. Coined by Porter and Kramer (2011), shared value involves redefining the purpose of a corporation to align profit motives with social needs. It encourages businesses to innovate in ways that improve their competitive positioning while addressing social challenges, such as developing sustainable products, improving supply chain practices, or fostering local economic development. This approach promotes a synergy where economic and social benefits are mutually reinforcing rather than mutually exclusive, leading to sustainable business practices that benefit both shareholders and society.

Organizations tend to focus on the creation of one type of value over the other primarily due to short-term pressures and the tangible nature of financial metrics. Financial performance metrics are more straightforward to measure, report, and communicate to investors and stakeholders, making economic value creation more immediately apparent and appealing for decision-making. Additionally, many organizations operate within a competitive environment where financial results are paramount for survival and growth, especially in the short term. Social value creation, by contrast, often requires long-term investments and yields less tangible or immediate benefits, which can make it less attractive under immediate financial concerns (Porter & Kramer, 2011). However, forward-thinking organizations recognize that integrating both value types through shared value initiatives can lead to sustainable competitive advantages and long-term success.

In conclusion, understanding the distinctions and interplay between economic and social values is crucial in strategic management. While traditional focus has been skewed toward economic gains, contemporary strategies emphasize creating shared value, which aligns business success with societal progress. By balancing these elements, organizations can enhance their resilience, reputation, and impact, thus contributing positively to society while ensuring profitability.

References

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M.. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Moore, M. H., du Plessis, V., & Warneryd, K. (2012). Social Value and Business Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 543-558.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy & Business, (26), 2-14.

Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable social ventures? Socio-economic issues in business. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 100-107.

Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (1999). Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 23-33.

Dubois, A., & Gibbert, M. (2010). Resisting the homogenization of strategic management research and practice: Challenging “best practice” approaches. Journal of Strategic Management, 22(4), 519-529.

Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the Value of 'Creating Shared Value'. California Management Review, 56(2), 130–153.

Goyal, P. (2020). Social value in corporate strategy: An overview. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(4), 34-41.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. New Society Publishers.