Respond To Two Students' Discussion Posts Just Type T 352411
Respond To Two Students Discussion Post Just Type The Paragraph Under
Sakyla makes a compelling argument about the importance of applying business management principles to public organizations. Her perspective highlights how these entities often seem to operate without clear principles or accountability, resembling small, mom-and-pop businesses rather than structured institutions accountable to the public. Sakyla emphasizes that public organizations are often scrutinized for their performance and integrity, which could be improved by adopting more rigorous management practices akin to those in the private sector. Her example from her experience in education underscores how resource mismanagement, driven by a lack of structured oversight, leads to waste—an issue that could be mitigated by implementing established business management principles like checks and balances, strategic planning, and fiscal discipline. The connection to course objectives is clear; it underscores the necessity of effective organizational management and accountability to foster public trust and efficiency, aligning with the goal of understanding how management principles can enhance public sector performance.
Nathan provides a nuanced perspective on the applicability of private sector management principles to public administration. He masterfully explains that while some managerial techniques have evolved in the private sector, fundamental differences—particularly in goals—limit their direct transfer. The primary distinction Nathan draws is that private corporations are profit-driven, whereas public institutions aim to serve the community with constrained resources. He references the work of Bower to illustrate that public organizations operate as the “art of the imperfect application of limited resources to massive objectives,” highlighting the strategic challenge. Nathan also notes that government investment in training public managers has improved over time, yet the fundamental resource limitations remain. His analysis aligns well with course objectives by emphasizing the importance of adapting management practices to the unique goals and constraints of public organizations. It highlights that effective leadership in the public sector requires balancing resource scarcity with service mandates, ensuring accountability and continuous adaptation to serve the public interest effectively.
References
- Bower, J. L. (1986). Strategic management: From philosophy to practice. In R. H. Langley (Ed.), Managing the public sector: Strategies for improving public organizations (pp. 135-152). Jossey-Bass.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations. Jossey-Bass.
- U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). (2019). Training and leadership development in the federal government. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov
- Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.
- Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Routledge.
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Listening to data: Some questions about performance measurement. In R. D. Behn (Ed.), The performancestat revolution (pp. 9-28). R&L Education.
- O'Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2013). The participatory governance regime. Springer.
- Kraemer, K., & King, J. (2017). IT management in government: Policies, initiatives, and best practices. IGI Global.