Response Parameters Prompts For This Course Are Not Opinion

Response Parametersprompts For This Course Are Not Opinion Questions A

Response parameters for this course emphasize the importance of supporting academic responses with scholarly sources. While the textbook can be used as a reference, it does not count as a scholarly source. Acceptable scholarly sources include current peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last 36 months. Older sources may be included to provide additional support, but at least one recent peer-reviewed journal article must be used for each main post. Wikipedia and other non-peer-reviewed sources are not considered valid academic references.

The proposal component of the assignment requires you to present a solution supported by credible sources, akin to requesting funding. Peer responses should similarly be supported with scholarly and reputable sources. Properly formatted references should follow the example: Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number(issue number), pages. DOI or URL if available.

For example, an appropriate citation is: Naujoks, T. (2020). Marketing functions and B2C e-marketplaces: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Marketing Channels, 26(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/X.2020

Peer responses must include scholarly citations such as peer-reviewed journal articles to substantiate points. Supportive responses should clearly reference current, reputable sources aligned with the assignment's criteria. This practice fosters academic rigor and enhances the credibility of discussions.

Paper For Above instruction

Academic writing in the context of this course centers on the rigorous use of scholarly sources to support arguments and proposals. Unlike opinion-based discussions, responses must be substantiated with credible evidence from recent peer-reviewed journal articles, dated within the last three years. The academic environment demands that sources such as Wikipedia are excluded due to their lack of peer review, whereas sources like scholarly journals, reputable industry reports, and official publications are prioritized.

The importance of using recent scholarly research is underscored by the dynamic nature of fields like e-commerce and digital marketing. For example, Naujoks (2020) provides insights into marketing functions in B2C e-marketplaces, emphasizing the evolving landscape of digital commerce. Such current research helps ground discussions in the latest findings, trends, and technological evolutions, ensuring that proposals are both innovative and supported by empirical data.

When constructing responses or proposals, it is critical to cite current studies to verify claims or support strategies. Proper citation not only lends credibility but also demonstrates an awareness of current trends and validated research. For instance, Laudon and Traver (2021) discuss foundational e-commerce technologies such as ubiquity and global reach, which can be integrated into proposals for implementing or improving e-commerce systems.

The disciplined use of recent peer-reviewed sources aligns with academic standards and prepares students for professional practice, where evidence-based decision-making is essential. It also encourages critical engagement with the scholarly literature, fostering more informed and effective solutions to complex problems involving technology, marketing, and business strategies.

In summary, this course requires an adherence to scholarly integrity by utilizing recent peer-reviewed sources, formatting citations correctly, and supporting all substantive statements with validated evidence. This approach enhances the quality of discussions, proposals, and responses, ultimately preparing students for success in both academic and professional settings.

References

  • Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2021). E-Commerce 2021: Business, Technology, and Society (16th ed.). Pearson.
  • Naujoks, T. (2020). Marketing functions and B2C e-marketplaces: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Marketing Channels, 26(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/X.2020
  • Raghavan, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2022). Digital marketing strategies in modern e-commerce. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 10(2), 85-92.
  • Xu, Y., & Kim, J. (2020). The impact of social media on consumer behavior in e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39, 100958.
  • Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital Marketing (7th Edition). Pearson Education.
  • Morana, S., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Emerging trends in online retail: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(5), 679-695.
  • Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2022). Personalization and customer engagement in e-commerce platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102878.
  • Shankar, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2023). The evolution of e-commerce business models. Business Horizons, 66(1), 123-133.
  • Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). The role of information density and interactivity in online shopping. Information & Management, 58(4), 103434.
  • Kapoor, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Social media marketing: A review of recent research trends. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 328-337.