Response To Discussion Posts On Emerging Adulthood And Lifes

Response to Discussion Posts on Emerging Adulthood and Lifespan Theories

Both discussion posts provide insightful perspectives into the complex developmental stage of emerging adulthood, emphasizing the importance of lifespan and resiliency theories. The first post underscores the shift from traditional social markers to a more fluid understanding of adulthood, highlighting how resilience enables homeless young adults to adapt despite adversity. The second post effectively links lifespan development theories like Freud’s psychosexual and Erikson’s psychosocial models to the concept of resilience, illustrating how personality formation and identity evolve over time. These insights enhance our understanding of human development, emphasizing that resilience and individual differences significantly influence developmental trajectories across the lifespan, especially during transitional phases like emerging adulthood.

Paper For Above instruction

Emerging adulthood is a pivotal developmental stage characterized by exploration, self-discovery, and transition into full adulthood, typically spanning ages 18 to 25 (Arnett, 2000). The integration of lifespan and resiliency theories offers a comprehensive understanding of this period, illuminating how individuals navigate challenges and adapt to changing circumstances. The lifespan development theory focuses on the chronological unfolding of human capabilities, skills, and personality traits, highlighting how development occurs across different stages (Mossler & Ziegler, 2016). In contrast, resiliency theory emphasizes positive adaptation despite adversity, focusing on strengths, coping mechanisms, and external supports (Smith-Osborne, 2007).

The first post discusses how emerging adulthood, especially among homeless youth, entails resilience in face of adversity. Resilience manifests through personal strengths, positive outlooks, external support networks, and adaptive coping strategies, allowing these individuals to develop ‘street smarts’ and resourcefulness (Thompson et al., 2016). The case study underscores the importance of a strengths-based approach, fostering empowerment and self-efficacy. However, limitations exist due to sample homogeneity, mainly Caucasian males from one city, which restricts broader applicability. Mental health issues prevalent among homeless populations might also influence self-reporting and resilience outcomes.

The second post reflects on developmental theories by Freud and Erikson, illustrating how personality and identity evolve through childhood and adolescence. Freud’s psychosexual stages suggest early personality traits influence later resilience, while Erikson’s psychosocial stages highlight ongoing identity development through social conflicts. The post acknowledges that resilience involves effective coping strategies and positive attitudes, which are crucial for navigating stress and adversity. However, it notes that personality outcomes could be hindered by disabilities or social disadvantages, suggesting that resilience is contingent on environmental and individual factors. Integrating these theories enriches our comprehension of how internal and external forces shape human development over time.

In sum, these discussions reveal the importance of integrating lifespan and resiliency frameworks to understand emerging adulthood comprehensively. Resilience not only buffers against adversity but also promotes healthy development by fostering strengths and adaptive skills. Recognizing individual variability and contextual influences is vital for developing targeted interventions that support young adults during this transitional phase. Ultimately, fostering resilience and understanding developmental processes across the lifespan can improve outcomes for diverse populations, including vulnerable groups like homeless youth and individuals facing disabilities.

References

• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.
• Smith-Osborne, A. (2007). Life span and resiliency theory: A critical review. Advances in Social Work, 8(1).
• Mossler, R. A., & Ziegler, M. (2016). Understanding development: A lifespan perspective. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.
• Thompson, S. J., Ryan, T. N., Montgomery, K. L., Lippman, A. D. P., Bender, K., & Ferguson, K. (2016). Perceptions of resiliency and coping: Homeless young adults speak out. Youth & Society, 48(1), 58–76.
• Gilmore, K. (2019). Is emerging adulthood a new developmental phase? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 67(4), 625–653.
• U.S. Department of Labor. (2017). High school dropout rates and transition to adulthood. Employment Reports.
• Bernstein, D. M. (2018). Lifespan theory of mind: A call for broader perspectives and more integration. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226(2), 85–86.
• Zorotovich, J., & Johnson, E. I. (2019). Five dimensions of emerging adulthood: A comparison between college students, non-students, and graduates. College Student Journal, 53(3), 376–384.
• Braun, S., & Volpe, V. (2019). Developmental psychology perspectives on resilience. Psychology Today.
• Holland, D. C., & Mehta, S. (2020). Lifespan development and psychological resilience. Journal of Human Growth and Development.