Responsibilities Related To A Business

Responsibilities Relate To A Businesss Co

Analyze the responsibilities of a business toward its stakeholders, including ethical, legal, economic, voluntary, and social responsibilities. Discuss how voluntary responsibilities can benefit businesses and identify which benefits are not typical. Examine the purpose of U.S. antitrust laws and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Review important consumer protection legislation such as the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972. Describe the sources of criminal and civil laws and how organizations engage in cause-related marketing. Explain the impact of cause-related marketing on consumer perceptions and buying patterns. Discuss the translation of societal values into core business principles and the influence of significant others—such as peers, managers, and coworkers—in the workplace. Consider ethical issues that influence business decision-making, including ethical issue intensity, organizational factors, and personal guilt. Explore the "spheres of influence" affecting ethical judgments, and analyze the "carrots and sticks" approach to employee motivation. Discuss normative business ethics and the importance of industry standards. Review Kohlberg's stages of moral development, the philosophy of deontology, and concepts of justice, including distributive and procedural justice. Examine enlightened egoism and its implications for decision-making, and understand how ethical sensitivity varies among individuals based on cognitive development stages.

Paper For Above instruction

In the contemporary business environment, understanding the multifaceted responsibilities of a business towards its stakeholders is essential. These responsibilities encompass a spectrum of ethical, legal, economic, voluntary, and social duties that collectively influence organizational operations and reputation. Stakeholder theory emphasizes that companies must consider the interests of all groups affected by their activities, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and shareholders (Freeman, 1984). These responsibilities are not only legal obligations but also ethical imperatives that foster trust and sustainability (Carroll, 1999).

Among the various responsibilities—such as economic, legal, ethical, voluntary, and social—voluntary responsibilities stand out due to their proactive nature. Engaging in voluntary responsibilities can significantly benefit a business by enhancing its reputation, fostering consumer loyalty, and creating a positive corporate image (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001). However, some benefits, such as reduced government intervention, may not be direct outcomes of voluntary responsibility initiatives. Instead, these actions demonstrate corporate citizenship and commitment beyond mere legal compliance (Maak & Pless, 2006).

The primary objective of U.S. antitrust laws, including the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, is to promote competition by prohibiting monopolistic practices and anticompetitive agreements. These laws aim to protect consumer welfare by ensuring fair pricing and open markets (Areeda & Hovenkamp, 2015). Similarly, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, fostering workplace diversity and equality (Bagenstos & Cummings, 2010). Such legislation underpins the legal framework guiding corporate conduct in the United States.

Consumer protection legislation, starting with the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, was enacted in response to public outrage over unsafe and misrepresented products, as depicted in Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" (Kessenich, 2011). These laws aim to safeguard consumers from deceptive practices and hazardous products, ensuring transparency and safety. The Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972 established the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which oversees product safety standards and recalls (CPSC, 2020). These legal protections demonstrate society's collective effort to uphold consumer rights.

Legal systems generate various sources of law, including statutory law, common law, constitutional law, administrative law, and judicial law. Notably, common law develops through judicial decisions, shaping legal interpretations over time (Schneider & Ingram, 2013). However, these sources do not include “judicial law” as a separate entity but rather refer to law clarified or created through court rulings; thus, judicial law is encompassed within case law.

Organizations often utilize cause-related marketing, a strategy that directly ties products or services to social concerns through marketing campaigns. This approach leverages consumer sympathy towards social causes and can positively influence consumer perceptions and buying behavior if the brand and cause are perceived as a good fit (Varadarajan & Menon, 1988). Such marketing not only enhances corporate reputation but also promotes social responsibility by aligning business goals with societal issues.

Consumer perceptions are profoundly affected by cause-related marketing, especially when consumers identify with the social cause and view the company's commitment as genuine. This alignment enhances brand loyalty, improves brand image, and can lead to increased sales (Liu et al., 2010). Nonetheless, the effectiveness depends on consumers recognizing authentic engagement rather than superficial gestures.

Businesses translate societal values into core principles through cultural development and organizational standards. This process involves embedding shared customs, norms, and artifacts into corporate practices, reflecting a commitment to social responsibility and ethical conduct (Schein, 2010). These core values guide decision-making, foster ethical environments, and shape organizational identity.

In the workplace, significant other groups—including peers, managers, supervisors, and subordinates—exert influence on employee behavior. These groups establish norms and expectations that impact ethical conduct and individual decision-making (Gini, 2004). Recognizing these influences helps organizations foster ethical cultures and promote positive work behaviors.

Workplace ethics evaluations often consider factors like ethical issue intensity, personal guilt, organizational culture, and individual morality. Ethical issue intensity involves the perceived importance of an ethical dilemma. Personal guilt reflects individual conscience, which can motivate ethical behavior (Trevino & Nelson, 2010). These considerations are vital in guiding ethical decision-making processes, ensuring responsible conduct.

The “spheres of influence” in ethical decision-making include the workplace, family, legal system, community, and educational environment. Each sphere contributes to a person's moral development and influences ethical judgments (Rest, 1986). An understanding of these spheres helps in designing interventions to promote ethical awareness across societal levels.

The motivational forces in organizations are often conceptualized as "carrots and sticks," representing rewards and punishments used by superiors to influence behavior (Vroom, 1964). This approach can be effective but must be complemented with intrinsic motivators, such as moral reasoning and personal values, for sustained ethical conduct.

Normative business ethics considers societal standards and industry norms that extend beyond legal requirements, providing a framework for ethical behavior. These standards reflect industry best practices and societal expectations, guiding businesses in navigating complex ethical landscapes (Donaldson & Werhane, 2007).

Adherence to ethical directives from superiors is associated with obedience to authority, a concept linked to Kohlberg's stages of moral development. Specifically, individuals at the obedience stage obey rules to avoid punishment, whereas higher stages involve more autonomous moral reasoning (Kohlberg, 1984).

Normative realities outside the legal realm include societal, political, social, and economic factors. Industry standards often shape the normative framework guiding corporate behavior, illustrating the importance of external influences on ethical decision-making (Swanson & Frederick, 2006).

In Kohlberg's model, individuals defining right and wrong based on legal contracts are typically operating at the social system and conscience maintenance stage, where morality is guided by maintaining law and order and upholding social contracts (Kohlberg, 1984). This reflects a development beyond obedience and mutual expectations stages.

Deontology, a moral philosophy based on duty and adherence to moral principles, emphasizes respecting individual rights and intrinsic morality. It advocates that actions are ethical if they conform to moral duties regardless of consequences (Kant, 1785/1993).

The philosophy that emphasizes equal respect for all persons is deontology, which holds that individuals have inherent dignity and worth that must be upheld in ethical decision-making (Ross, 1930).

In Kohlberg's stages, an individual emphasizing others over self is typically situated at the third stage, corresponding to mutual interpersonal expectations and relationships—often considered the “good boy/good girl” stage (Kohlberg, 1984).

The last of Kohlberg's cognitive moral development stages is the stage of universal ethical principles, where individuals base moral decisions on universal concepts of justice, rights, and respect for human dignity (Kohlberg, 1984).

Distributive justice concerns the fairness of outcomes or results in resource allocation, emphasizing equity and equality. Procedural justice focuses on the fairness of processes involved in decision-making, ensuring procedures are impartial and consistent (Leventhal, 1980).

A central problem with relativism is that it emphasizes cultural or individual differences, which can lead to inconsistency and difficulty in establishing universal standards for ethical behavior. Many argue it undermines moral objectivity and can justify unethical practices if culturally tolerated (Rachels, 2003).

Rights-based justice deals with what individuals are entitled to based on their rights, often grounded in deontological ethics. This approach emphasizes respecting individuals' rights and duties within the workplace, influencing decisions more aligned with duty than utility (Rawls, 1971).

Enlightened egoism involves balancing self-interest with concern for others’ long-term well-being, recognizing that acting ethically can align with one's self-interest over time. It advocates for decisions that benefit both the individual and society (Baumeister & Vohs, 2016).

People who begin the value shift towards unethical decisions often justify their actions through mechanisms such as moral disengagement, which allows them to diminish feelings of guilt and moral responsibility (Bandura, 1991). These justifications include moral justification, euphemistic labeling, and advantageous comparison.

The first step in the ethical decision-making process involves recognizing that an ethical issue exists—an awareness critical for engaging moral reasoning (Trevino & Nelson, 2010). Awareness leads to deliberate reflection on the values and principles involved.

The motivational “carrots and sticks” used by superiors influence employee behavior, often aiming to align individual actions with organizational goals through rewards and punishments (Vroom, 1964). These incentives are part of organizational behavior management.

Employees who tend to conform to their environment because they see no better options often exhibit a compliance or passive attitude towards ethical issues, often referred to as “going along to get along” (Kohlberg, 1984).

Ethical sensitivity refers to perceiving whether a situation or decision has an ethical dimension. Lower sensitivity can result from insufficient moral development or organizational cultures that discourage ethical awareness (Gini, 2004).

Individuals with lower ethical issue sensitivity tend to be less aware of the moral aspects of decisions. They often focus more on task completion and may be less driven by ethical considerations, potentially leading to more unethical practices (Trevino & Nelson, 2010).

Enlightened egoism recognizes that individual self-interest can be harmonized with societal benefits through ethical conduct. It advocates for decisions that serve one's long-term interests without sacrificing moral principles (Baumeister & Vohs, 2016).

Deontology is based on the premise that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of outcomes, emphasizing duties and moral obligations. This approach values principles such as honesty, fairness, and respect for persons (Kant, 1785/1993).

Advancing through Kohlberg's stages of moral development—particularly towards the stage of universal ethical principles—reflects increased moral reasoning based on justice, rights, and respect for human dignity (Kohlberg, 1984).

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Areeda, P., & Hovenkamp, H. (2015). Antitrust law: An analysis of antitrust principles and their application. Aspen Law & Business.
• Bagenstos, S. R., & Cummings, J. (2010). Discrimination law: Cases, statutes, and regulations. Aspen Publishers.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
• Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
• CPSC. (2020). About the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Consumer Product Safety Commission. https://www.cpsc.gov/About-cpsc
• Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (2007). Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
• Kant, I. (1993). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. Harper & Row.