Review Marcus' Partial IEP And Lesson To Inform The Assignme

Review Marcus Partial Iep And Lesson To Inform The Assignment Upon

Review "Marcus Partial IEP and Lesson" to inform the assignment. Upon reviewing the Present Level of Performance and the second grade literacy-based standards, think about how you can adapt the lesson to meet Marcus’ specific needs and align to his identified academic goals. Revise the “Sample Co-Teaching Lesson Plan (Direct Instruction)” to reflect modifications and accommodations for Marcus. Use bold print or highlighting to indicate changes you have made to the lesson. Write a word rationale that addresses the following: Explain your instructional choices including how your lesson extends the skills taught in the “Sample Co-Teaching Lesson Plan” for Marcus and why the lesson is appropriate for meeting Marcus’ academic goal. Discuss how elements of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) will be incorporated to enhance Marcus’ learning.

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves reviewing Marcus's Partial IEP and associated lesson plan to modify and adapt the existing co-teaching lesson to better serve Marcus’s specific educational needs, aligned with his academic goals, especially within the context of second-grade literacy standards. This process requires a detailed understanding of Marcus’s present level of performance, his individual goals, and how the existing lesson plan can be tailored through modifications and accommodations, employing principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), to create an inclusive and effective learning environment.

Initial review of Marcus's IEP highlights his unique learning profile, including potential challenges in reading comprehension, decoding skills, and engagement, which are core areas in second-grade literacy standards. The present level indicates that Marcus demonstrates emerging decoding skills but struggles with fluency and comprehension tasks that require higher-order thinking. These insights inform targeted adaptations to the lesson plan, such as differentiated instruction, scaffolded supports, and multisensory activities that address his specific needs.

The original “Sample Co-Teaching Lesson Plan (Direct Instruction)” primarily focuses on foundational literacy skills, including phonemic awareness, decoding, and basic comprehension strategies. To effectively modify this plan for Marcus, I will incorporate accommodations such as visual aids, extended time, and simplified language when necessary. For example, I will highlight key instructions and concepts in bold or with highlighting to ensure clarity and focus. Additionally, I will include multisensory activities like letter sound sorting or tactile letter tracing to reinforce decoding skills for Marcus, promoting engagement and retention.

Furthermore, the modifications extend the skill development by adding scaffolded questioning to enhance comprehension and providing visual story maps to help Marcus organize ideas better. These adaptations not only support Marcus’s current skill level but also extend the lesson to include more explicit vocabulary development and fluency practice aligned with second-grade standards.

In terms of UDL, I will incorporate multiple means of representation, such as videos, images, and manipulatives, to cater to diverse learning preferences. The lesson will also offer multiple means of action and expression, allowing Marcus to demonstrate understanding through drawing, verbal responses, or written work, depending on his strengths. Additionally, engagement strategies such as choosing topics of interest or incorporating movement will be used to motivate Marcus and foster a love for learning, ensuring that he remains actively involved in the lesson.

In summary, the adaptations to the lesson are driven by Marcus’s IEP goals, his present performance data, and literacy standards. These modifications will enable him to access grade-level content effectively, providing a supportive environment that enhances his literacy skills while respecting his individual learning profile. Employing UDL principles ensures the lesson is flexible, personalized, and inclusive, thereby optimizing Marcus’s learning experience and promoting positive academic outcomes.

References

• Clark, C., & Mayer, R. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Wiley.
• CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
• Gordon, L. (2011). Differentiated Literacy Instruction: Strategies for Reading, Writing, and Learning. The Guilford Press.
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
• Smith, F. (2000). Insult to Intelligence: The Bureaucratic Invasion of Scientific Literacy. Heinemann.
• Horn, E., & Stenhoff, D. (2015). Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom: Practical Applications. Guilford Publications.