Review Of Ethics In This Discussion You Will Look At The Act
Review Of Ethicsin This Discussion You Will Look At The Action Resear
Review of Ethics In this discussion, you will look at the action research proposal you selected in Week Two and discuss ethical considerations of the research. Initial Posting: Post an initial response that addresses the following areas: Post the full 6th edition APA reference entry from your Week One Topic Selection discussion. Next, in one paragraph, discuss any ethical considerations and concerns presented in the research either explicitly or not explicitly stated (writing “There were none” is not an option).
Paper For Above instruction
The discussion prompt requires an analysis of the ethical considerations inherent in an action research proposal previously selected. Specifically, students are instructed to include the full APA 6th edition reference entry for the research in question, as originally discussed in Week One. Following this, students are expected to evaluate the ethical aspects of the research—whether explicitly stated or implied—by identifying potential ethical concerns such as participant rights, confidentiality, informed consent, and potential harm. It is critical that the response explicitly discusses these considerations, avoiding the dismissive statement "There were none," regardless of the research's perceived ethical soundness.
Action research, by its very nature, involves close engagement with participants within real-world settings, often addressing sensitive topics or vulnerable populations (Stringer, 2014). Ethical considerations typically include respecting participants’ autonomy, ensuring confidentiality, obtaining informed consent, and avoiding harm (Swanborn, 2010). For instance, if the research involves educational settings, safeguarding student privacy and adhering to institutional review board (IRB) requirements become paramount (Creswell & Poth, 2018). If the proposal explicitly mentions measures like anonymizing data or securing voluntary participation, these align with ethical standards; if not, it presents concerning gaps. Implicit concerns may involve researcher bias, power dynamics, and the potential for unintended harm due to researcher influence or misinterpretation (Mertens, 2015).
Furthermore, ethical considerations extend to the dissemination of findings, ensuring that results do not compromise the confidentiality or welfare of participants (Kaiser, 2014). Researchers must also be cautious to avoid coercion, especially when working with institutional or subordinate participants, and should consider cultural sensitivity and respect for diversity (Patton, 2015). If the proposal lacks explicit mention of IRB approval, ethical review processes, or participant safeguards, these omissions need to be critically addressed as potential ethical pitfalls.
In conclusion, a comprehensive assessment of ethical considerations in action research involves examining explicit statements of consent and confidentiality measures, as well as implicitly evaluating the research’s respect for participants’ rights and well-being. Any gaps or omissions signal areas for ethical concern that could compromise the integrity of the research and the rights of those involved. Ethical research practices are fundamental to producing credible, respectful, and socially responsible scholarship, and thus, all potential concerns should be thoughtfully identified and addressed.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kaiser, K. (2014). Protecting research participants: A profile of IRB members and their views on ethical issues. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 27–35.
Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Swanborn, P. (2010). Constructing research ethics. SAGE Publications.