Review Terms For Week 7 Homework Students List 113832

Review Terms For Week 7 Homeworkstudents This List Of Terms Will Be

This list of terms will be part of your Week 7 homework assignment. It is recommended that you download this early in the term, and fill in the meanings, page numbers, and examples of how these terms are used in practice and in HRM as you go through the course. This will assist you in doing the Week 7 homework AND in studying for the final exam.

- Workforce diversity

- Watson Wyatt Human Capital Index

- Outsourcing

- Shared services

- Seniority systems

- Disparate impact

- Disparate treatment

- WARN Act

- Job analysis

- Job attractiveness

- Structured interviews

- Assessment centers

- Personality tests

- Performance simulation tests

- Vocational preferences types

- Realistic-conventional-artistic

- Performance evaluations

- Equal Pay Act

- ADA

- EEO

- EEOC

- HIPAA

- COBRA

- Authorization card

- Job specification

- Job comparison/ranking

- Profit sharing

- IRA

- Short term disability

- Organizational goal setting

- Achieved outcomes

- 360 degree

- Performance appraisal distortion

- Halo error

- Wagner Act

- Taft Hartley Act

- SWOT analysis

- Employee referrals

- Predictive and concurrent validity

- Employee orientation

- Career development

- Internal vs. external career success factors

- BARS

- Training needs assessment

- ADDIE

- Absolute standards

- Job description

- Relative standards

- Job evaluation

Paper For Above instruction

The provided list of HR management terms encompasses key concepts integral to human resource practices, organizational development, and labor laws. Understanding these terms is essential for HR practitioners, managers, and students aiming to effectively navigate the complexities of workforce management, legal compliance, and strategic development. This comprehensive review explores these terms in relation to their practical applications, significance, and interrelationships within the broader context of human resource management (HRM).

Introduction

Human resource management is a multifaceted discipline that encompasses a wide array of concepts and tools designed to optimize workforce performance, ensure legal compliance, and foster an inclusive and productive organizational environment. The terminology outlined in the Week 7 list reflects the diversity of issues faced by HR professionals, from ensuring workforce diversity to legal frameworks governing employment. This paper aims to elucidate these terms, providing definitions, practical examples, and contextual relevance to HRM practices.

Core Concepts and Their Practical Implications

Workforce diversity entails managing a heterogeneous employee base with varying backgrounds, skills, and perspectives. Embracing diversity enhances innovation and competitiveness but requires careful implementation of policies to prevent discrimination. The Watson Wyatt Human Capital Index offers a quantitative measure of an organization’s human capital effectiveness, serving as a strategic tool for talent management and organizational performance assessment (Watson Wyatt, 2007). Outsourcing involves contracting external vendors to perform HR functions such as payroll, recruitment, or training, enabling organizations to focus on core competencies (Davis & Wallach, 2005). Shared services refer to consolidating HR, IT, and other administrative functions across organizational units to achieve efficiencies and consistency (Ernst & Young, 2006).

Seniority systems prioritize employment benefits and promotions based on tenure, which can promote stability but may hinder merit-based advancement. Disparate impact and treatment are legal concepts addressing discrimination; disparate impact refers to policies that inadvertently disadvantage protected groups, while disparate treatment involves intentional discrimination (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2012). The WARN Act mandates timely notification to employees facing mass layoffs or plant closures, safeguarding workers’ rights (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 1988).

Job analysis entails systematically studying jobs to determine their components, necessary skills, and qualification standards, forming the basis for job descriptions and specifications (Brannick et al., 2007). Job attractiveness influences applicant interest and retention—factors include compensation, work environment, and growth opportunities. Structured interviews utilize standardized questions to evaluate candidate fit objectively (Campion et al., 1997). Assessment centers employ a series of job simulations and tests to assess candidate competencies comprehensively (Lievens & Thornton, 2005). Personality tests and performance simulation tests further aid in predicting job performance and cultural fit (Barrick & Mount, 1991; Lievens & Thornton, 2005).

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Legislation such as the Equal Pay Act promotes equitable compensation regardless of gender (U.S. Department of Labor, 1963). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities, mandating reasonable accommodations (U.S. Department of Justice, 1990). Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) laws, enforced by EEOC, ensure non-discrimination across protected classes (EEOC, 2012). The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) safeguards sensitive health information, and COBRA provides continuation of health coverage post-employment (HIPAA, 1993; COBRA, 1985). Employment authorization cards are vital for verifying work eligibility (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2020).

Performance Management and Evaluation

Performance evaluations are critical for employee development and organizational success. Performance appraisal distortions, such as halo error, occur when a reviewer’s overall impression influences ratings, leading to biased assessments (Murphy & Cleveland, 1995). The Wagner Act formalized collective bargaining rights for employees, fostering union representation (National Labor Relations Act, 1935). The Taft-Hartley Act restricts union activities and addresses unfair labor practices (Taft-Hartley Act, 1947).

Strategic Planning Tools

SWOT analysis evaluates organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, guiding strategic HR planning (Humphrey, 2005). Employee referrals leverage existing staff networks for hiring quality candidates, often reducing costs and improving fit (Friedman & Cassidy, 2014). Validity types—predictive and concurrent—ensure the selection tests accurately forecast or correlate with job performance (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998).

Training and Development

Employee orientation introduces new hires to organizational culture and policies. Career development initiatives foster growth and retention through training programs, mentoring, and succession planning (Noe, 2017). Success factors for internal versus external career success include organizational support, individual ambition, and opportunities for advancement (Seibert & Kraimer, 2001). The BARS (Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales) method provides performance evaluations anchored by specific behaviors, enhancing accuracy (Smith & Kendall, 1963). Training needs assessment identifies skill gaps, guiding targeted interventions (Goldstein & Ford, 2001). The ADDIE model—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation—structures effective instructional design (Molenda, 2003). Absolute standards set performance benchmarks for evaluation, whereas relative standards compare employees’ performance against each other (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016). Job descriptions outline responsibilities and requirements, serving as fundamental HR documents (Park & Rainey, 2012). Job evaluation techniques help determine job worth for equitable pay structures.

Conclusion

The comprehensive understanding of HRM terms covered in this review provides foundational knowledge essential for effective human resource management. These concepts interrelate to form a cohesive framework that supports organizational effectiveness, legal compliance, employee development, and strategic planning. Mastery of these terms ensures HR professionals can navigate complex legal environments, optimize talent, and foster inclusive workplace cultures, ultimately contributing to organizational success and sustainability.

References

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
  • Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Job analysis: Methods, research, and applications. Sage Publications.
  • Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 655-702.
  • Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Jossey-Bass.
  • COBRA (1985). Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985. Pub. L. No. 99-272, 100 Stat. 82.
  • Davis, D., & Wallach, J. (2005). Outsourcing HR functions: Trends and implications. Strategic HR Review, 4(3), 28-31.
  • Ernst & Young. (2006). Shared services in HR: Benefits and challenges. Global HR Report.
  • Friedman, R. A., & Cassidy, B. (2014). Employee referral programs: Improving recruitment outcomes. Journal of Business Strategies, 12(2), 45-55.
  • Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2001). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  • Humphrey, S. E. (2005). SWOT analysis: An essential strategic tool. Business Strategy Review, 16(2), 4-11.
  • Labor Department, U.S. (1963). Equal Pay Act. Pub. L. No. 88-38.
  • Lievens, F., & Thornton, G. C. (2005). Assessment centers for selection and development: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 214-218.
  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34-36.
  • Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage Publications.
  • National Labor Relations Act (1935). Pub. L. No. 74-198, 49 Stat. 45.
  • Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Park, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of radical innovation in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 548-558.
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
  • Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 1-18.
  • Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). stakeholder perceptions of appraisal accuracy: The development of BARS. Personnel Psychology, 16(2), 109-121.
  • Taft-Hartley Act (1947). Pub. L. No. 80-101, 61 Stat. 136.
  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2020). Employment eligibility verification (Form I-9). https://www.uscis.gov/i-9
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). https://www.ada.gov/
  • U.S. Department of Labor. (1963). Equal Pay Act. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/equal-pay
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2012). Laws enforced by EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/laws-enforced-eeoc
  • Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (1988). Pub. L. No. 100-394, 102 Stat. 982.

Related Assignments