Review The CDC's Framework For Program Evaluation

Review The Cdcs Framework For Program Evaluation Reflect On the Step

Review the CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation. Reflect on the steps and standards related to engaging stakeholders. Review the six purposes of evaluation in the McKenzie, Neiger, and Thackeray text. Think about which purposes apply to the example public health programs and why they are important. Review the Week 1 Health Program Articles (in the Learning Resources) and select one health program to address.

Imagine who the stakeholders might be for your selected program. If the abstract does not list stakeholders specifically, you can suggest who might have been involved. Think about potential stakeholder expectations and how those expectations may influence the purposes of program evaluation. Review the Course Project Guidelines (in the Learning Resources). Post a comprehensive response to the following: Indicate which of the Health Program Articles you chose (see the Learning Resources).

List the stakeholders within each of the following roles: Those involved in program operations; Those served or affected by the program; The primary users of the evaluation results. Explain what different stakeholders may expect from the evaluation. Explain which of the six purposes of evaluation apply to the published program that you selected.

Paper For Above instruction

The CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation is a comprehensive and systematic approach that emphasizes stakeholder engagement throughout the evaluation process. As outlined in the framework, engaging stakeholders is essential to ensure that evaluation questions are relevant, findings are useful, and actual decision-making influences program improvements. According to the CDC, stakeholders encompass anyone affected by or involved in the program, including staff, participants, funders, and community members. Their involvement ensures that diverse perspectives inform the evaluation and that it meets the needs of various groups involved.

Reflecting on the steps of the CDC’s framework, stakeholder engagement is emphasized during the stakeholder analysis phase and throughout the evaluation process. This engagement helps identify evaluation priorities, tailor communication strategies, and enhance the utilization of results. The CDC’s standards advocate for transparency, inclusiveness, and collaboration with stakeholders to improve the relevance and credibility of the evaluation.

In the McKenzie, Neiger, and Thackeray text, six purposes of evaluation are outlined: accountability, program improvement, program planning, understanding impact, advocacy, and institutional strengthening. Each purpose has particular relevance depending on the context of the program. For example, accountability ensures that programs demonstrate thorough financial and operational oversight. Program improvement focuses on refining activities to maximize health outcomes. The purpose of understanding impact is crucial when assessing the long-term effects of a health intervention. Advocacy purposes aim to garner support from policymakers or the community, while institutional strengthening aims to build capacity within organizations.

For this reflection, I selected the “School-Based Obesity Prevention Program” from the Week 1 Health Program Articles. This program primarily targets children and adolescents to promote healthy eating and physical activity to combat childhood obesity. The stakeholders involved include school administrators, teachers, students, parents, health educators, and community health agencies.

Stakeholders involved in program operations primarily include school administrators, teachers, and program staff. They are responsible for implementing program activities and ensuring that resources are effectively utilized. Those served or affected by the program include students and their families, who directly benefit from healthier behaviors and improved health outcomes. The primary users of evaluation results are typically school health officials, program funders, and public health policymakers interested in assessing program effectiveness and scalability.

Different stakeholders have varying expectations from the evaluation. School administrators and teachers may seek evidence that the program integrates seamlessly into the school curriculum and positively influences student behavior. Parents and students are likely to expect tangible improvements in health and well-being. Funding agencies and policymakers often look for accountability evidence demonstrating the efficient use of resources and the program’s impact on obesity rates.

In this case, the evaluation primarily aligns with the purposes of program improvement, understanding impact, and accountability. Improving the program entails revising activities based on evaluation findings to maximize effectiveness. Understanding impact helps determine if the program contributes to reducing obesity prevalence among students. Accountability ensures that the program maintains transparency regarding resource use and health outcomes achieved.

In conclusion, stakeholder engagement is integral to the CDC’s framework, ensuring evaluation relevance and promoting utilization of findings for continuous improvement. Different stakeholders have distinct but interconnected expectations that shape the evaluation process. Understanding which of the six evaluation purposes align with a specific health program guides evaluators to produce meaningful and actionable insights, ultimately advancing public health goals.

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR, 60(S-13), 1-16.
• McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2020). Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer. Pearson.
• Evans, R. G., & Stoddart, G. L. (2015). The health care evaluation paradox. Health Affairs, 4(4), 1-15.
• World Health Organization. (2018). Process of stakeholder engagement in health program evaluation. WHO Publications.
• Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage Publications.
• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson.
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. Guilford Press.
• Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorldEvaluation: Working for Social Change. Sage Publications.