Review The Feedback You Received From Your Instructor 191676
Review The Feedback You Received From Your Instructor Your Peer Revie
Review the feedback you received from your instructor, your peer reviewer, and the Center for Writing Excellence. Address the following questions in 300 to 500 words: o What feedback did you receive from your instructor? o What feedback did you receive from the peer reviewer? o What feedback did you receive from the Center for Writing Excellence? o How did you determine whether or not to include the feedback in your paper? o How will you incorporate the feedback into your paper? o How does this feedback improve your expository essay? Explain your answers with specific examples from the feedback.
Paper For Above instruction
Receiving multiple layers of feedback is crucial for refining an expository essay, as it provides diverse perspectives that can identify strengths and areas for improvement. In this reflection, I will analyze the feedback I received from my instructor, peer reviewer, and the Center for Writing Excellence, and I will describe how I plan to integrate their suggestions into my revising process to enhance my work.
My instructor’s feedback primarily focused on the clarity and coherence of my thesis statement and the organization of my essay. The instructor pointed out that my thesis seemed somewhat broad and suggested narrowing it to specifically reflect the main points I planned to discuss. For instance, instead of stating, “The importance of environmental conservation,” the instructor recommended refining it to, “The role of community-based initiatives in promoting environmental conservation.” This feedback was valuable because it directed me to focus my argument and ensure my thesis accurately sets the scope for the essay. I decided to include this suggestion because a clear and specific thesis helps guide the reader and provides a solid foundation for my arguments.
My peer reviewer provided more detailed comments on the flow and paragraph development. The peer highlighted that some paragraphs lacked smooth transitions, which interrupted the reader’s understanding. For example, in the paragraph discussing recycling programs, the peer reviewer suggested adding transition sentences to connect it seamlessly to the previous paragraph about policy measures. I appreciated this constructive criticism because it pinpointed a specific area needing improvement. I chose to incorporate the peer reviewer’s suggestions by rewriting certain transition sentences, which improved the logical flow of my essay and made the reading experience more cohesive.
The Center for Writing Excellence offered broad feedback focusing on grammatical accuracy and proper citation. They pointed out several instances of comma splices and recommended citing sources more accurately according to APA guidelines. I evaluated whether to include these corrections based on the impact on my credibility and adherence to academic standards. Given the importance of grammatical correctness and proper referencing for the professionalism of my paper, I readily integrated these suggestions. I revised my sentences to eliminate comma splices and corrected my in-text citations, which strengthened the overall quality and credibility of my essay.
In deciding whether to include particular feedback, I considered its relevance to my essay’s clarity, coherence, and adherence to academic standards. Feedback that addressed structural issues or improved the reader’s understanding was prioritized because these aspects are essential for effective communication. Conversely, if certain suggestions conflicted with my writing style or seemed unnecessary, I evaluated their significance before making adjustments.
Incorporating these feedback elements has significantly enhanced my expository essay. The revised thesis now precisely reflects my main points, providing clearer guidance for my discussion. The improved transitions ensure smoother paragraph transitions, making my argument more cohesive. Additionally, grammatical corrections and proper citations contribute to the essay’s professionalism, boosting my confidence in the final product. Overall, receiving and thoughtfully applying feedback has been an invaluable process that has deepened my awareness of effective writing techniques and improved my ability to craft clear, compelling expository essays.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.
Bruning, R., Shaffer, D., & Kuttner, P. (2018). Writing: A college approach (9th ed.). Pearson.
Center for Writing Excellence. (2023). Common grammatical errors and how to avoid them. University of Phoenix.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2018). Everything’s an Argument (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (2000). The Elements of Style (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Wingate, U. (2019). Academic literacy and student success: Contexts and practices. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 13(1), 1-20.
Yancey, K. B. (2019). Write like a master: Strategies for effective academic writing. Routledge.