Review The Following Records Of Activity In Accounts

Review The Following Records Of Activity In Various Accounts And Creat

Review the following records of activity in various accounts and create graphical representation of the activity. Highlight the key information associated with the activity. Finally discuss whether the graph reveals any red flags, what they are and how you would investigate them further. Highlight the key information: 1-2 ABC paid DEF $5,000 on February 5, using check #2394, written on Bank of America account . The memo line stated: “for product.†1-3 ABC paid GHI $30,000 on November 12, using check #3651, written on Bank of America account . The memo line stated: “loan.†1-4 ABC paid JKL $25,000 on August 30, in a wire transfer between Bank of America account and the Royal Bank of Canada (a/c #) for further credit to Cayman Island Bank, account , Cayman Islands. 2-1 DEF paid ABC $10,000 on January 3, using check #1792, written on Wells Fargo account . The memo line stated: “repay loan.†2-2 DEF paid JKL $13,000 on October 1, in a wire transfer between Wells Fargo account and the Royal Bank of Canada (a/c #) for further credit to Cayman Island Bank, account , Cayman Islands. 3-1 JKL wired $20,000 on February 9, from Cayman Island Bank, account , Cayman Islands, to Royal Bank of Canada (a/c #) for further credit to Bank of America account . 4-1 GHI deposited 10 U.S. postal money orders into Wells Fargo account on November 13, each for $2,999, purchased on November 12 at various postal facilities in Boston, Massachusetts. Create a graphical representation of the account activity of the accounts recorded here. Does the graphical representation raise any red flags? What are they? How would you investigate them further?

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of financial account activities requires a comprehensive approach that includes detailed recording, visualization, and scrutiny for potential red flags. The provided records involve multiple transactions across different accounts and institutions, emphasizing the importance of creating clear and insightful graphical representations to detect unusual patterns. This paper discusses how to organize these activities visually, highlights potential red flags, and suggests investigative steps for anomalous findings.

Graphical Representation of Account Activities

To accurately portray the transaction activities, a multi-dimensional graph such as a network diagram or flow chart is most suitable. This type of visualization maps the transactions between entities (accounts, individuals, institutions), illustrating the direction and amount of funds exchanged over time.

In this context, a timeline-based flow chart can be employed to plot the chronological sequence of events, incorporating key details such as transaction type (check, wire, deposit), amount, date, and associated accounts. Different colors or symbols can denote various transaction types: for example, checks in blue, wires in red, and deposits in green. Annotations or labels should include the memo descriptions for added context.

Specifically, the diagram would include nodes representing the accounts: Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Royal Bank of Canada, Cayman Island Bank, and postal facilities in Boston. The edges would symbolize each transaction: for example, a check from ABC to DEF, a wire transfer between Bank of America and Cayman Islands Bank, and postal money orders deposited into Wells Fargo. Quantifying the transaction amounts and marking transaction dates on the edges enhance interpretability.

Tools such as Gephi, Microsoft Visio, or even Excel can facilitate creating such network diagrams or flow charts for visual analysis.

Key Information and Potential Red Flags

Examining the transactions reveals several notable points:

• Large check payments, such as ABC's $30,000 to GHI and $25,000 to JKL, suggest significant monetary activity needing validation.
• Wire transfers from ABC to Cayman Islands Bank via the Royal Bank of Canada indicate cross-border transactions often scrutinized for money laundering risks.
• Repayment from DEF to ABC and subsequent payments to JKL also involve sizable transactions, some of which are directed through offshore accounts.
• The collection of multiple postal money orders by GHI at the same postal facility, all for nearly $3,000, could suggest structuring or smurfing to avoid reporting thresholds.

When visualized, these activities may reveal patterns of concern such as repetitive large transactions, frequent small deposits just below reporting thresholds, and cyclical fund movements through offshore entities that could be indicative of money laundering or tax evasion schemes.

Red Flags and Investigation Strategies

The main red flags identified from the graphical analysis include:

• Unusual transaction sizes and frequencies: Regular large payments, especially recurring wire transfers to offshore accounts, merit scrutiny for potential money laundering.
• Layering via offshore accounts: The movement of funds through Cayman Islands Bank and Royal Bank of Canada suggests attempts to obscure the origin or destination of illicit funds.
• Structuring of deposits: Multiple postal money orders slightly below the $3,000 reporting threshold could be a deliberate effort to evade detection, known as structuring or smurfing.

To investigate these red flags further, the following steps are recommended:

1. Request detailed transaction records and bank statements to verify the authenticity and purpose of the transactions, especially those involving offshore accounts.
2. Conduct interviews with account holders and correspondent banks to understand the context and legitimacy of these activities.
3. Compare transaction patterns against known money laundering schemes to identify similarities and anomalies.
4. Implement enhanced due diligence for the involved accounts, including beneficial ownership verification and source of funds inquiries.
5. Use forensic accounting techniques to analyze the flow of funds over time, detecting attempts at layering or integration of illicit proceeds.

In conclusion, combining graphical representations with targeted investigations enables financial institutions and regulators to identify potential illicit activities effectively. Continuous monitoring and adaptive analysis tools are vital in maintaining compliance and preventing financial crimes.

References

• Financial Action Task Force. (2019). Guidance on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism. FATF Recommendations.
• Levi, M. (2008). Money laundering and its regulation. Crime, Law and Social Change, 49(4-5), 275–288.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. UNODC Publications.
• Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). (2021). Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) Guidance. U.S. Department of the Treasury.
• Chaikin, D., & Cuccia, D. (2019). Network analysis in financial transactions: detecting illicit activities. Forensic Science International, 306, 110088.
• Harvey, J. (2016). Money laundering and the criminal process. Routledge.
• Selvadurai, S., & Alwi, S. F. (2020). Cross-border banking and money laundering risks. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 315–330.
• International Monetary Fund. (2018). Guide to Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism. IMF Publications.
• Pickering, T., & Walker, R. (2020). Forensic accounting and financial investigations. Routledge.
• World Bank. (2017). Anti-Money Laundering Measures in Cross-border Transactions. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.