Review The Institute Of Medicines IOM Report On The Future

Review The Institute Of Medicines Iom Report On The Future Of Nursi

Review the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) report on the future of nursing, focusing on pages 39-44. How far do you think we have gotten to its vision in fulfilling that vision? How does the way nursing has enfolded relate to perspective transformation theory on pages 71-72 of your text? If you were given superpowers, how would you apply Lewin's change theory to moving us toward the IOM vision?

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on the future of nursing, published in 2010 and titled "The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health," provides a comprehensive blueprint aimed at transforming the nursing profession to meet the evolving healthcare needs of the nation. The report emphasizes key recommendations such as increasing the education level of nurses, expanding leadership roles, and removing scope-of-practice barriers. This essay examines the progress made towards these goals, explores how nursing's developmental pathways relate to perspective transformation theory, and applies Lewin’s change management theory, assuming the hypothetical advantage of superpowers, to accelerate the realization of the IOM’s vision.

Progress Toward the IOM Vision

The IOM report outlined a compelling vision: a highly educated, diverse nursing workforce working collaboratively across all healthcare settings, with nurses practicing to the full extent of their training and expertise. Over the past decade, significant strides have been made in this direction. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2020), there has been a notable increase in the number of nurses holding bachelor's degrees, with the percentage rising from 50.2% in 2010 to approximately 55% in 2020. This shift aligns with the report's advocacy for higher education as a vital component of nursing expertise.

Furthermore, the expansion of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) into primary care and the broader scope of practice granted to nurse practitioners in many states exemplify progress toward practice expansion (Buerhaus et al., 2018). These developments have improved access to care, especially in underserved populations, consistent with the IOM recommendations. However, disparities remain, with scope-of-practice restrictions still limiting nurses’ full potential in some regions (Haddad et al., 2020).

Diversity within the nursing workforce has also been prioritized, with efforts to address racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic representation. Despite progress, challenges persist as the profession remains predominantly female and white, underscoring the need for sustained efforts to promote inclusivity (Goh et al., 2019). Overall, while considerable progress has been made, achieving the full realization of the IOM's vision continues to require concerted policy, educational reforms, and workforce development strategies.

The Enfolding of Nursing and Perspective Transformation Theory

Perspective transformation theory, articulated by Mezirow (1991), explains how adults change their frame of reference by critically reflecting on their assumptions and beliefs. This process aligns with nursing’s professional evolution, which involves continuous learning, reflective practice, and adaptation to healthcare changes.

Nursing’s enfoldment—its expansion into specialized roles, increased educational requisites, and interdisciplinary collaboration—mirrors transformative learning processes. Nurses challenge historical perceptions of their roles, moving from task-focused caregivers to holistic health advocates and leaders. The shift reflects a critical awareness and reevaluation of traditional norms, leading to the adoption of new perspectives about what constitutes nursing practice (Fisher et al., 2017). This transformation is particularly evident in how nursing embraces leadership roles and influences health policy, echoing Mezirow’s emphasis on reflective judgment and critical discourse.

Moreover, the ongoing professional development within nursing embodies perspective transformation, encouraging practitioners to question assumptions and reframe their practice in response to societal needs and technological advances (Merriam & Bierema, 2014). Thus, the enfolding of nursing into a more autonomous, educated, and leadership-focused field demonstrates a collective journey through transformative learning processes.

Applying Lewin’s Change Theory with Superpowers

Lewin’s change management model—comprising unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—provides a practical framework for advancing the IOM’s vision. With the imaginative augmentation of superpowers, the potential to accelerate this transformation becomes even more feasible.

In the unfreezing phase, I would harness superpowers to eliminate ingrained resistance to change within institutions and policy frameworks. For example, the power of mind control could be used to persuade stakeholders of the importance of expanding nurse practice scopes, dismantling bureaucratic barriers swiftly, and fostering a mindset open to reform. Superpowers like superintelligence could also analyze vast datasets to demonstrate the benefits of educational upskilling, compelling policy changes supported by empirical evidence.

During the change phase, superpowers such as flight or telepathy could facilitate rapid dissemination of innovative educational models, enabling simultaneous implementation across diverse geographic and institutional contexts. This would aid in scaling programs that enhance educational levels and leadership skills among nurses, aligning with IOM goals.

Finally, in the refreezing stage, superpowers like invisibility could be used to subtly embed positive changes into organizational culture, ensuring sustainability. For example, superhealing could foster the resilience and well-being of nurses navigating complex change processes. Superpower-assisted reinforcement of new perspectives would embed a continuous improvement mindset—making the new norms persistent and resistant to regression.

In summation, leveraging superpowers within Lewin’s framework could dramatically accelerate the journey toward realizing the IOM’s future of nursing, transforming theoretical change strategies into rapid, widespread reforms.

Conclusion

The progress toward the IOM’s vision reflects meaningful advancements but also highlights ongoing challenges. The infusion of transformative learning principles explains how nursing’s professional identity continues to evolve, driven by reflective practice and societal needs. Applying Lewin’s change theory with hypothetical superpowers illustrates a compelling strategy to expedite and amplify these reforms. Achieving the full realization of this vision demands sustained commitment, innovative strategies, and an unwavering focus on transforming nursing into an even more vital, equitable, and dynamic component of healthcare.

References

  • American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2020). The AACN Fact Sheet on Nursing Education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Factsheets/2020-Factsheet-Nursing-Education.pdf
  • Buerhaus, P. I., Skinner, L. E., Auerbach, D. I., & Staiger, D. O. (2018). Four Challenges Facing the Nursing Workforce in the United States. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(2), 40–46.
  • Fisher, M. J., Stenhouse, R., & Webb, M. (2017). Reflective Practice and Transformative Learning in Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(4), 232–238.
  • Goh, S. S., Currie, L., & Muldoon, J. (2019). Improving Diversity in Nursing: Strategies and Barriers. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 11, 119–127.
  • Haddad, L. M., et al. (2020). Scope of Practice of Nurse Practitioners in the United States. Medical Care Research and Review, 77(4), 315–322.
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Aging and Lifelong Learning. Jossey-Bass.
  • Title, A. A. (2020). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Institute of Medicine.