Review The Resources And Examine The Clark Healthy Workplace

Review The Resources And Examine The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory

Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015). Review the Work Environment Assessment Template. Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues. Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources: Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011), Clark (2018), Clark (2015), Griffin and Clark (2014).

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of my workplace environment, guided by the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory and the associated assessment tools, reveals significant insights into the current state of organizational civility and health. The assessment score of 35, which is below the threshold of 50 indicating a very unhealthy environment per Clark (2015), underscores areas requiring urgent attention. This paper will explore the assessment results, relate them to relevant theoretical frameworks from selected literature, and propose evidence-based strategies to cultivate a high-performance, civil work environment in the healthcare setting.

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment

The Work Environment Assessment, completed for this module, highlighted critical aspects of my workplace. The overall score of 35 indicates a severe deficiency in organizational health and civility. Notably, the organization scored highly on celebrating collective and individual achievements and possessing conflict resolution skills. These positive aspects suggest an acknowledgment of the importance of recognition and conflict management, which are essential for maintaining civility. However, these strengths are contrasted sharply by low scores in communication, staff support, decision-making inclusivity, and staff retention. For instance, staff frequently feel excluded from decision-making processes, impacting team cohesion and trust. Furthermore, staffing issues related to patient acuity and workload imbalances result in an unsafe environment, contributing to staff dissatisfaction and high turnover. This dissonance between strengths and weaknesses underscores a workplace that has begun steps toward civility but remains plagued by significant organizational deficiencies.

Two surprising findings stood out. First, the high score in celebrating achievements was unexpected given the overall poor assessment, indicating recent positive initiatives. Second, despite the high conflict resolution skills noted, the frequent instances of disrespectful communication and high turnover suggest that conflict management strategies are not sufficiently effective or widely applied. Prior to conducting the assessment, I believed that staff morale was generally better than the data indicated, which was confirmed by the high achievement scores but contradicted by the overall low organizational health score. The results suggest that while there are commendable efforts and some positive practices, the overall work environment suffers from poor communication, inadequate support, and a culture that does not fully prioritize civility or staff well-being. Consequently, the health and civility of my workplace are compromised, impacting staff safety, job satisfaction, and patient care.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature

The selected literature by Clark (2015) emphasizes the significance of fostering a respectful, supportive, and collaborative organizational culture to enhance civility and organizational health. Clark advocates for deliberate strategies such as open communication, recognition, and conflict resolution as foundations for civil work environments. These concepts relate directly to the assessment findings, particularly the areas of communication deficits and staff disengagement. Clark’s model suggests that cultivating a culture of civility involves continuous reinforcement of respectful behaviors, transparent decision-making processes, and shared vision alignment. Applying this theory within my healthcare organization implies establishing structured channels for open dialogue, regular recognition programs, and training in conflict de-escalation and communication skills. For example, implementing daily huddles or inclusive staff meetings can facilitate shared decision-making, increase transparency, and foster trust. Emphasizing these values aligns with Clark’s emphasis on intentional efforts to embed civility into daily organizational practice, which can improve staff morale, reduce turnover, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Furthermore, Griffin and Clark (2014) revisit cognitive rehearsal as an intervention to combat incivility and lateral violence. This theory offers practical strategies for empowering staff through role-playing and scenario-based training to respond assertively yet professionally to uncivil behaviors. Applying cognitive rehearsal techniques in my organization could involve workshops where staff practice responses to disrespectful interactions, thereby reinforcing civility as a shared value. This approach can diminish occurrences of incivility, improve team cohesion, and promote a culture where respectful communication is normative. By integrating these theoretical insights, organizations can shift from reacting to incivility after it manifests to proactively preventing it through education, peer support, and leadership modeling.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams

Based on the assessment results and supporting literature, I recommend two strategies to address identified shortcomings. First, establishing structured communication protocols—such as regular interdisciplinary team meetings, daily briefings, or electronic communication platforms—can enhance transparency and inclusiveness. Clark (2015) emphasizes that open communication reduces misunderstandings and fosters civility, which is essential in high-stress healthcare environments. For instance, implementing standardized briefings before shift changes ensures all team members are informed about patient acuity, staffing needs, and safety concerns, reducing conflict and promoting teamwork.

Second, developing a comprehensive civility and conflict resolution training program rooted in cognitive rehearsal and role-playing techniques, as discussed by Griffin and Clark (2014), can empower staff to handle uncivil behaviors constructively. This training would include scenarios common in healthcare settings, providing practical tools for de-escalation and assertive communication. Such initiatives can reinforce respectful interactions, decrease workplace incivility, and build a culture of mutual respect and support, leading to improved staff retention and patient safety.

To bolster successful practices, I propose implementing recognition and reward systems that celebrate positive behaviors and team achievements regularly. Clark (2015) advocates for the importance of acknowledgment in building a positive organizational climate. Recognizing and publicizing acts of civility can reinforce desirable behaviors and motivate staff to uphold high standards of professionalism and mutual respect. Additionally, leadership commitment to modeling civility and providing ongoing support and feedback are critical. Leaders should actively demonstrate respectful communication, listen to staff concerns, and involve staff in decision-making processes, fostering a sense of shared purpose and trust.

In conclusion, addressing the deficiencies revealed through the Work Environment Assessment requires a multifaceted approach that includes improving communication, providing civility training, and fostering recognition. These strategies, supported by literature, can lead to a healthier, more respectful, and more productive work environment, ultimately enhancing both staff satisfaction and patient care quality.

References

  • Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23.
  • Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leaders' perspectives. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013ec4
  • Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.3928/
  • Warner, J., Sommers, K., Zappa, M., & Thornlow, D. (2016). Decreasing workplace incivility. Nursing Management, 47(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.91398.c3
  • Clark, C. M. (2018). Strategies for building a civil work environment in healthcare. Nursing Leadership, 31(4), 48–54.
  • Other scholarly references related to civility, organizational health, and team building strategies as appropriate.

Related Assignments