Review Your Problem Or Issue And Cultural Assessment ✓ Solved

Review Your Problem Or Issue And The Cultural Assessment Consider How

Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for your capstone change project. Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention. Below each objective, provide a one or two sentence rationale. After writing your objectives, provide a rationale for how your proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Culturally sensitive interventions are essential in addressing health disparities among diverse populations. This paper aims to align a specific health issue with cultural assessment findings and develop objectives for an intervention that promotes autonomy and social justice.

Problem or Issue and Cultural Assessment

The problem identified is the low rate of hypertension management among African American adults in urban settings. A cultural assessment revealed that this population often experiences mistrust towards healthcare providers, is influenced by traditional beliefs, and faces socioeconomic barriers that hinder effective management. These findings highlight the importance of culturally tailored interventions that respect beliefs and address systemic barriers.

Connection to Topic and Intervention

The findings connect deeply with the intervention by emphasizing the need for community trust-building, culturally competent education, and empowerment strategies. An effective intervention would acknowledge cultural beliefs about health, incorporate community leaders, and focus on empowering individuals to participate actively in their health decisions.

Objectives for the Proposed Intervention

1. Increase awareness and understanding of hypertension within the African American community through culturally tailored educational sessions.

   Rationale: Education that respects cultural norms can improve knowledge and engagement, leading to better health outcomes.

2. Build trust between healthcare providers and community members via community engagement activities and employing community health workers from within the population.

   Rationale: Trust is essential for effective healthcare delivery; involving community members fosters rapport and acceptance.

3. Improve medication adherence by providing personalized counseling that considers cultural beliefs and socioeconomic factors.

   Rationale: Addressing specific barriers enhances adherence and empowers individuals to manage their condition effectively.

4. Enhance access to blood pressure monitoring and healthcare services through mobile clinics and community events.

   Rationale: Removing logistical barriers increases opportunities for regular health check-ups and early intervention.

5. Promote patient autonomy by involving individuals in developing their care plans and health goals.

   Rationale: Respecting patient preferences and empowering decision-making supports social justice and individual agency.

Rationale for Advocacy of Autonomy and Social Justice

The proposed project emphasizes respecting individuals’ cultural beliefs, engaging them actively in their care, and reducing systemic barriers—all critical to promoting autonomy and social justice. By fostering an environment where diverse populations feel valued, respected, and empowered, the intervention aligns with principles of health equity. It recognizes the importance of culturally competent care in addressing social determinants of health and advocating for the rights of underserved communities to equitable health outcomes.

Conclusion

In summary, aligning the intervention objectives with cultural assessment findings ensures culturally sensitive care that advances autonomy and social justice. Incorporating community engagement, education, and personalized care not only improves health outcomes but also fosters respect for diversity and supports social equity in healthcare delivery.

References

• Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Park, E. R. (2014). Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key perspectives and trends. Health Affairs, 33(3), 493–500.
• Heurtin-Roberts, S., &voir, J. (2016). Culturally competent health promotion interventions. Journal of Community Health, 41(4), 862–870.
• Institute of Medicine. (2003). In the nation’s compelling interest: Ensuring diversity in the health care workforce. National Academies Press.
• Marteau, T. M., et al. (2013). Psychological aspects of health care engagement and decision making in diverse populations. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 54–61.
• Omar, M., et al. (2019). Addressing social determinants of health to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S2), S152–S155.
• Shea, C. M., et al. (2016). Toward a culturally competent health system. Medical Care, 54(4), 377–378.
• Syed, S. T., et al. (2017). Community-based participatory research: Improving access and health outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 107(5), 778–784.
• Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013). Racism and health II: A needed research agenda for effective interventions. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1190–1214.
• Zuckerman, S., et al. (2014). Promoting health equity through culturally tailored health interventions. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11, E125.
• World Health Organization. (2017). Social determinants of health. WHO.