Reviewing The Concepts Of Ethnic Conflict And Totalitarianis ✓ Solved

Reviewing the concepts of ethnic conflict and totalitarianism: Of

Reviewing the concepts of ethnic conflict and totalitarianism: Often students are confused on what constitutes an ethnic conflict. Before you select a topic for this assignment, be sure to review the information below to gain a better understanding of what constitutes Totalitarianism and ethnic conflict. Totalitarianism and ethnic conflict are not the same as violent acts committed by a police officer that was officially deemed as being racially motivated. Ethnic conflict is when government has discriminatory policies in place. Slavery and segregation were examples of ethnic conflict.

Many students confuse recent events of violence or shooting by police officers on individuals as examples of ethnic conflict. However, not all of those actions were acts of racially motivated violence. In addition, they were committed by individuals in the execution of their job, which are subject to review and oversight (administrative and legal), and if deemed excessive and/or racially motivated, will be sanctioned and prosecuted because they would go against standing policies and laws that do not allow excessive force in the execution of police duties or racially motivated violence against others (by police or any other person). In the 1960s and earlier, we had state governments requiring African Americans to be segregated. This was an example of ethnic conflict. We do not have government policy in this country today promoting the harassment or killing of people because of their race. If a person kills another person, it is a legal issue. If the killing took place because of the race of the person, it is also a hate crime. It is not designated as ethnic conflict.

Topics centered on racial inequity such as Black Lives Matter, while important and viable topics in the context of race relations and social justice, are not the same as ethnic conflict in Totalitarian regimes, and so are not appropriate topics for this assignment. Instructions Write a paper on a current event article that discusses restrictions on freedoms by a totalitarian state or an article on ethnic conflict within a nation. Summarize the article and explain why this issue is important to the global community. What outside influences might help change this issue? How? Is the article neutral? Why or why not? Be sure to include a scanned copy of the article in your submission in addition to citations. Articles may not be more than one month old. Preferred Writing Requirements (APA format).

Refer to the APA manual. Length: 3 full pages (not including the title or references page) 1-inch margins Double-Spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title and Reference page required APA cite article with link Scan copy of article required.

Paper For Above Instructions

In recent months, the global community has witnessed alarming instances of restrictions on personal freedoms in totalitarian states, one of which is the troubling situation in Myanmar following the military coup on February 1, 2021. An article from The New York Times titled "Myanmar’s Military Coup: A Timeline of Events" outlines the continued crackdown on civil liberties, dissent, and media freedoms in the country. The military's transition to power has not only disrupted a budding democracy but has also embedded a dangerous precedent for the international community, where the suppression of ethnic minorities has escalated, marking a worrying trend of totalitarian practices.

Totalitarianism, as described in political theory, denotes a system of government that seeks to exert total control over the public and private lives of its citizens, using coercive measures to maintain its power and suppress dissent. In Myanmar, the military junta has imposed restrictions on free speech and assembly, conducted widespread detentions of dissenters, and intensified violent crackdowns against ethnic groups, particularly the Rohingya Muslims, signaling severe ethnic conflict and systemic discrimination embedded in the governance of the state.

This issue is critical for the global community as it echoes larger themes regarding human rights violations, ethnic cleansing, and the deterioration of democratic structures. The suppression of ethnic minorities not only poses a moral crisis but also threatens regional stability in Southeast Asia, risking a spillover into adjacent countries such as Thailand and India. The international community must recognize that ethnic conflicts, like the one seen in Myanmar, present urgent challenges that necessitate unified actions, humanitarian interventions, and robust international diplomacy aimed at restoring democracy and protecting human rights.

One of the key factors influencing the change in this scenario could be international pressure from global powers, including economic sanctions enforced by countries like the United States and members of the European Union. These sanctions aim to halt the flow of funds to the military government, thereby weakening its capacity to sustain its oppressive regime. Furthermore, the active involvement of international organizations such as the United Nations could also play a pivotal role. Extended dialogues, fact-finding missions, and resolutions advocating for the return to democratic governance and human rights protections could manifest tangible outcomes in the ongoing crisis.

Moreover, promoting grassroots movements and supporting local organizations focused on ethnic reconciliation and empowerment may also help in alleviating ethnic tensions in Myanmar. Organizations working on the ground can bridge cultural divides and foster dialogue among different ethnic communities, ultimately contributing to conflict resolution and peacebuilding initiatives.

Regarding the neutrality of the article, it is essential to analyze the inherent biases evident in various media portrayals. The New York Times article provides substantial factual accuracy while highlighting the systemic issues of human rights abuses undertaken by the military; hence, we can suggest it leans towards a source that calls for accountability. While one may argue that a completely neutral tone is nearly impossible to achieve in emotionally charged contexts like a military coup, the article succeeds in presenting well-rounded perspectives through factual recounting, despite an implicit advocacy for restoration of democracy in Myanmar.

In conclusion, the conversation surrounding ethnic conflict and totalitarianism in Myanmar but also globally remains a critical focal point in international relations. As the world continues to grapple with the catastrophes of totalitarian regimes and ethnic strife, it becomes ever more crucial for global partnerships to unify in condemning such practices while advocating for justice and protection of human rights among oppressed populations. As history has shown, the ramifications of inaction during episodes of ethnic conflict often yield irreversible consequences, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and acting upon these pivotal issues amidst our current societal climate.

References

• Severino, C. (2023). Myanmar’s Military Coup: A Timeline of Events. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/01/world/asia/myanmar-coup-timeline.html
• Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Broadway Books.
• Rummel, R. J. (1997). Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence. Transaction Publishers.
• Tilly, C. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.
• Goldstone, J. A. (2019). Revolutions: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
• Fukuyama, F. (2018). Political Order and Political Decay. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Weber, M. (2013). Politics as a Vocation. Hackett Publishing Company.
• Gordon, S. (2022). Ethnic Conflict: A Comparative Perspective. Springer.
• Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
• Snyder, J. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. W.W. Norton & Company.