Revision Project Instructions Week 10: This Week You Will Be
Revisionprojectinstructionsweek 10this Week You Will Be Focusing On
Revision Project Instructions Week 10 This week you will be focusing on submitting your revised Reader/Response Essay. Please review all the resources associated with revision and self-review. You will be assessed using a rubric very similar to the 100 point rubric from your first submission. The only difference will be that there is a section that will evaluate how well you implemented the list of revisions you noted in your Week 9 submission as well as the instructor comments on your first submission. I have attached the story, the original Essay, a revision list and also the annotated essay from my professor. I have also attached a revision check list. PLEASE READ DIRECTIONS IN FULL AND LOOK AT ALL ATTACHMENTS!!
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment for this week involves submitting a thoroughly revised Reader/Response Essay, reflecting significant improvements based on prior feedback and personal review. The process begins with careful review of all provided resources related to effective revision and self-assessment techniques. Students are expected to incorporate their own revision plans, previously noted in their Week 9 submission, and address instructor comments from the first draft to enhance the clarity, coherence, and analytical depth of their essays.
The attached materials serve as essential tools for this process. These include the original story that prompted the essay, the initial version of the Reader/Response Essay, a detailed revision list created by the student, and an annotated version of the essay with instructor feedback. Additionally, there is a revision checklist designed to ensure that students have addressed all critical aspects of their writing. It is imperative that students read all instructions carefully and thoroughly review all attachments to understand the revision expectations fully.
Assessment criteria for this assignment are based on a comprehensive rubric similar to the initial grading rubric, with particular emphasis on how well students have implemented their revision strategies. This includes applying feedback, refining thesis statements, strengthening supporting arguments, improving paragraph structure, and ensuring linguistic clarity and grammatical correctness. Successful submission demonstrates an understanding of the importance of revision as an integral part of the writing process, highlighting the progression from the initial draft to the polished final product.
This exercise aims to cultivate critical self-review skills, encouraging students to become reflective writers who actively seek out areas for improvement and address them systematically. The final revised essay should not only meet academic standards for writing quality but also showcase insightful engagement with the source material and demonstrate growth as a writer.
References
- Blakesley, D. (2010). The Elements of Writing about Literature. Pearson.
- Harris, R. (2017). Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process. Routledge.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
- Lunsford, A. A., & Ede, L. (2016). The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). Oral language & literacy development in elementary classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 231–261.
- Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. Jossey-Bass.
- Shanahan, T. (2016). What Is Reading? Theory, Research, and Practice. The Guilford Press.
- Gordon, C. (2015). Revision Strategies for Academic Writing. Writing & Teaching in Higher Education.
- Hyland, K. (2019). Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education. Routledge.
- Smagorinsky, P. (2014). Teaching Writing in the Common Core Era. National Council of Teachers of English.