Reword These Two Paragraphs, Use Your Own Words, And Do Not

Reword These Two Paragraphs Use Your Own Words And Do Not Use

According to Colander (2013), behavioral economic policy involves creating strategies based on models that incorporate behavioral economics principles, considering that humans tend to behave in ways that are predictably irrational. In contrast, economic engineering focuses on both analyzing markets and designing mechanisms that facilitate market operations or other forms of coordination. While behavioral economics aims to understand and forecast irrational behaviors within economic contexts, economic engineering is concerned with actively shaping and controlling these behaviors. An example of this is utilizing Black Friday sales to motivate consumers to stay out late and purchase Christmas gifts. Such tactics serve as coordination tools, aligning individual preferences with broader collective desires. This approach naturally progresses into mechanism design, which entails defining specific objectives and creating systems such as markets, social programs, or contractual agreements to realize those goals. (Source: Colander, D. C., 2013, Economics, 9th edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin)

Paper For Above instruction

Behavioral economics and economic engineering represent two distinct yet interconnected approaches within the field of economics, each with unique objectives and methodologies. Behavioral economic policy is rooted in understanding the habitual and often irrational tendencies of individuals in economic decision-making, with the aim of subtly influencing behavior through strategic interventions. These interventions, often termed "nudges," leverage insights from psychology and behavioral science to guide choices without restricting freedom. Conversely, economic engineering emphasizes the proactive design of systems, mechanisms, and institutions that shape market outcomes and human behavior at a macro level. It aims to create structures—such as markets, regulations, or contractual frameworks—that direct economic activity toward desired objectives, often through carefully calibrated incentives and rules.

The application of behavioral economics can be seen in marketing strategies like Black Friday sales, which are designed to motivate consumers to make purchases they might not have otherwise considered, especially during peak holiday shopping seasons. Such tactics serve as coordination mechanisms, aligning individual desires with broader economic goals. These mechanisms underpin the field of mechanism design, which involves setting clear objectives and developing systems—whether markets, social programs, or contractual arrangements—that achieve particular outcomes. This process requires a thorough understanding of human behavior and economic incentives to craft effective procedures that foster efficiency and productivity.

On the other hand, the concept of a "nudge" involves consciously structuring choice environments to encourage individuals to make decisions that are beneficial for themselves and society, without eliminating freedom of choice. From a philosophical standpoint, some might argue that nudging infringes on personal liberty, but advocates contend that individuals still retain the ultimate option to choose differently. The primary concern with nudging is its potential for misuse, particularly when entities with vested interests attempt to steer behavior for specific gains. Government agencies, for example, often employ nudging techniques to influence public behavior, which can provoke objections related to autonomy and freedom. In contrast, private companies are less likely to use nudges beyond their profit motives unless it offers direct benefits to them. Educational institutions and workplaces might also employ nudging strategies to foster positive outcomes without causing controversy, as their intent is often aligned with societal and individual well-being.

References

  • Colander, D. C. (2013). Economics (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2015). Article on libertarian paternalism. Behavioral Public Policy, 1(1), 4-24.
  • Birch, S., & Siddiqi, M. (2016). The role of mechanism design in economic policymaking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 97-120.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), S164–S187.
  • Lunn, P., et al. (2018). Ethical considerations in nudging and behavioral interventions. Behavioral Public Policy, 2(2), 183-200.
  • Hansen, P. G. (2017). The ethical dimensions of nudging. Economics & Philosophy, 33(2), 319-357.
  • Camerer, C., et al. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton University Press.
  • Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, D. G. (2009). Nudging and libertarian paternalism: The ethics of influencing choices. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 10(4), 635-649.
  • Frey, B. S. (2018). The ethics of nudging. Springer.

Related Assignments