Rights In Business: Which Do You Think Is Most Important ✓ Solved

Rights in Business What right do you think is most often

The employment relationship is governed by various rights and obligations that aim to protect both employers and employees. One of the most often neglected or violated rights in this relationship is the right to fair treatment. For instance, consider a scenario where an employee, John, consistently meets performance expectations while another counterpart receives preferential treatment due to their friendship with a manager. This favoritism becomes glaringly apparent during promotions and raises, where John’s contributions are overlooked while his friend receives unmerited advantages. Such situations reflect not only a breach of fairness but also erode workplace morale and trust, as it creates a hostile environment that favors personal relationships over merit.

The right being violated in John's case is essentially the right to fairness in the workplace, which is a fundamental component of ethical employment practices. This right encompasses several facets, including equal pay for equal work, unbiased performance evaluations, and an environment where all employees can voice their concerns without fear of retribution. The entitlement this grants to employees is huge—it establishes an expectation that their contributions will be evaluated on merit and effectiveness rather than personal biases or relationships. When this right is neglected, it contributes to a toxic work culture where employees may feel discouraged and undervalued.

The right to fair treatment protects employees against arbitrary decisions that could be detrimental to their career advancement. It empowers them to raise concerns about preferential treatment and ensures they are evaluated based on their qualifications, performance, and competence. Fairness in the workplace not only benefits the individuals involved but also fosters a more collaborative and productive environment overall. Employees who feel they are treated fairly are often more engaged and motivated, leading to better organizational outcomes. Hence, ensuring that the right to fair treatment is upheld is crucial for maintaining a healthy employer-employee relationship.

Paper For Above Instructions

In exploring the rights and responsibilities integral to the employee-employer dynamic, it becomes evident that the right to fair treatment is frequently neglected. The impact of favoritism within the workplace can significantly disadvantage those who are not part of the preferred inner circle. Such neglect breeds an environment steeped in mistrust and unease, affecting overall workplace harmony and productivity. The example of John illustrates how favoritism manifests in concrete scenarios, ultimately impeding career progression based on merit and accomplishments.

Identifying the right that applies in this situation elucidates the broader implications of fairness in professional settings. The mandate for fair treatment is not just a courtesy; it is a right that all employees should expect. Companies often tout egalitarian principles, promoting ideals of diversity and inclusion, yet many fail to enforce these principles consistently. When favor is shown to one employee over another due to personal relationships, it undermines the very foundation of these values. Hence, the entitlement that accompanies the right to fairness encompasses not only expectations of equitable treatment but also the necessity for companies to implement procedures that uphold this right, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Fair treatment is significant as it corroborates the idea that all employees, regardless of their background or personal relations, are entitled to a level playing field. This right enables employees to voice their apprehensions regarding preferential treatment. Furthermore, protecting this right allows companies to foster a culture wherein all employees feel secure in voicing their experiences and challenging injustices without fear of negative repercussions. The importance of safeguarding the right to fair treatment is paramount because it speaks to the ethics of an organization, directly influencing employee satisfaction and retention.

Alongside the right to fair treatment, it is essential for employees to comprehend the implications of hostile takeovers and discrimination within their professional environments. The discourse surrounding the ethical ramifications of hostile takeovers unravels complex questions of morality and corporate governance. In contexts such as Maxxam's takeover of Pacific Lumber, the ethical objections primarily stem from the impacts on local communities and employees who face potential job losses and weakened job security. It raises fundamental inquiries about corporate responsibility, profit motives, and the human cost of such corporate strategies.

Addressing discrimination in the workplace presents another pivotal ethical consideration. Crafting arguments against discrimination requires not only highlighting moral inconsistencies but also employing persuasive communication strategies to enlighten those who may harbor unwitting biases. Conversations centered on discrimination must be approached with empathy and openness to engage effectively with individuals who may not recognize their prejudiced behavior.

Throughout these discussions, it is paramount to support arguments with concrete examples and evidence while also respecting various perspectives. The ethical landscape in business is multifaceted, demanding conscientious engagement from employees and employers alike. Upholding rights such as fair treatment, understanding the implications of hostile takeovers, and combating discrimination are critical for fostering equitable workplaces that value every individual’s contributions.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• Greenberg, J. (2011). Behavior in Organizations. Pearson Education.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Sandel, M. J. (2013). What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Simmons, E. (2015). Discriminatory Practices and Their Impact on Diversity in the Workforce. Employee Relations Journal.
• Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. Methuen & Co.
• Stone, D. (2004). The Ethics of Hostile Takeovers: To Be or Not to Be! Business Ethics Quarterly.
• United States Department of Labor. (n.d.). Employee Rights and Responsibilities. https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination
• Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal.