Risk Management For Students

Risk Management 6risk Managementstuden

In reference to the Risk Management article by Dr. James Kallman, he stated that creating a risk management course is a vital precondition towards measuring risk. Although it’s important for one to have a clear understanding of the organization’s goals and procedures before embarking on the risk management techniques. They should undertake risk analysis which is done in the following ways: Foremost, they should have a clear comprehension of the type of skills to be measured. The risks can be classified as operational, economic or strategic. Operational risks are the conventional business and hazard risks that have occurred for many years.

Economic risks are the political and financial conditions that have originated from the micro and macroeconomic measures. Examples include interest rate risk, exchange rate risk, convertible risk, and ransom risk. By sorting out the risks, it enables us to understand the linked perils and hazards (Anderson, 2005). The next step is setting up the parameters that will clearly define each risk and the associated characteristics. Risks can be categorized into pure or speculative. They can be further defined by relating their source: changes in pure risks are caused by perils, whereas changes in speculative risks are caused by opportunities.

He argued that the rationale for risk management is to assist others in creating value. This purpose can be achieved by initiating safety measures to save lives or by purchasing insurance to compensate for losses. He proposed the use of the risk management solution tree—a visual tool illustrating options available to create value efficiently. The tree displays various solutions that can be used. He suggested that, for both threats and opportunities, the initial decision is to either accept or avoid the situation.

By choosing avoidance, the firm does not face any potential gains or losses. Acceptance is suitable if the risk falls within the firm’s risk tolerance or appetite. Once acknowledged, the firm decides whether to accept the risk as is or to allocate resources to control it. If the risk’s variance, probability, timing, and impact are within acceptable limits, the best action may be “do no control.” If any aspect exceeds the acceptable range, resources should be allocated to bring it within limits. For pure risks with a high probability of loss, it's wise to spend resources preventing the loss; if the potential loss is enormous, measures should be taken to reduce its occurrence.

He also emphasized that risk management, regardless of efforts, must be financed through three primary costs: risk control, risk management administration, and loss financing. Risk control costs include advertising, safety projects, and prevention initiatives. Risk management administration involves overheads like salaries and consulting fees. Loss financing covers transfer programs like insurance and risk retention strategies (Hopkin, 2013).

He highlighted loss prevention projects as the most crucial aspect of the risk management budget since reducing loss probability decreases costs associated with losses and administrative expenses, resulting in organizational stability and confidence. According to Riscario, since 2006, four main risk management techniques have been identified: risk avoidance, loss control, risk retention, and risk transfer (Crouhy, Galai & Mark, 2010).

Risk avoidance involves eliminating risks, such as discontinuing hazardous products. Loss control encompasses loss prevention—reducing the frequency—and loss reduction—limiting severity—through safety measures like segmentation, pooling, and diversification. Risk retention entails financing losses oneself, such as through deductibles or long-term disability insurance. Risk transfer involves shifting risk to others, typically through insurance policies or other formal arrangements, such as family support or contractual agreements.

Both approaches aim to balance chances of loss or gain, depending on the risk type—pure or speculative. While Riscario proposes various techniques, Kallman emphasizes the importance of the risk management solution tree—a visual display of strategies—to efficiently create value. In conclusion, Kallman asserts that “prevention is worth a pound of insurance,” underscoring prevention as a critical loss control measure that preserves assets, saves lives, and reduces costs.

Controlling the probability of losses is vital for value creation and achieving organizational goals. Effective risk management involves understanding and implementing appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks, thereby fostering organizational stability and growth (Anderson, 2005; Crouhy et al., 2010; Hopkin, 2013).

Paper For Above instruction

Risk management is a fundamental aspect of organizational strategy, encompassing a systematic process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential risks that can impede the achievement of corporate objectives. As articulated by Dr. James Kallman, establishing a comprehensive risk management course is essential for understanding and measuring risks effectively. This entails a nuanced understanding of organizational goals, procedures, and the environment within which risks occur.

Fundamentally, risk analysis involves classifying risks into different categories—operational, economic, and strategic. Operational risks refer to internal hazards stemming from the organization’s daily activities, such as system failures, fraud, or safety lapses. These risks have historically been prevalent across various industries. Economic risks emerge from macroeconomic and political conditions, influencing the organization through interest rates, exchange rates, or financial instability. For example, interest rate fluctuations can affect borrowing costs, while exchange rate volatility may impact international trade margins.

Strategic risks involve broader, long-term uncertainties about market dynamics, competitive positioning, or regulatory changes. Proper classification allows organizations to tailor their risk responses appropriately. Kallman emphasizes the importance of defining parameters that characterize each risk, considering whether they are pure or speculative. Pure risks, such as natural disasters or theft, involve the potential for loss only. In contrast, speculative risks—like investing in new markets—carry the possibility of both gain and loss. Understanding the source of change—peril or opportunity—is critical for effective risk management (Anderson, 2005).

The primary rationale behind risk management, as highlighted by Kallman, is value creation. Organizations can create value by implementing safety measures that preserve human life and assets or by transferring risk through insurance. His proposed risk management solution tree offers a visual framework displaying all available strategies, from acceptance and avoidance to mitigation and transfer. The initial decision is whether to accept or avoid a risk based on its projected impact and the organization’s risk appetite. Avoiding risks entails eliminating exposure altogether, which may be suitable for highly hazardous activities or products.

Acceptance involves recognizing risks within acceptable thresholds, allowing organizations to allocate resources selectively. For instance, if a risk’s variance, timing, or impact aligns with organizational tolerances, the organization might choose “do nothing.” Conversely, when risks threaten to exceed tolerances, intervention becomes necessary. These interventions can involve preventative measures—such as safety programs—to reduce the probability or severity of losses. For example, for high-probability risks, resource investment in loss prevention helps reduce the likelihood of occurrence. When losses are significant, mitigation efforts focus on decreasing impact severity.

Effective risk management also involves planning for the financial consequences of risks. Kallman identifies three main costs—risk control, administrative, and loss financing—that organizations must budget for. Risk control includes prevention initiatives like safety protocols and risk mitigation projects aimed at decreasing loss probability. Administrative costs cover the expenses associated with managing risk programs, such as staffing and consultancy services. Loss financing encompasses mechanisms like insurance or self-insurance to deal with residual risk; these methods transfer or retain risk depending on organizational strategy (Hopkin, 2013).

Among risk management techniques, loss prevention holds paramount importance. By reducing the likelihood and consequence of adverse events, organizations can achieve greater stability and confidence. The allocation of budget to such projects underscores their strategic value in risk reduction. Riscario (2006) lists four core techniques: risk avoidance, loss control, risk retention, and risk transfer. Risk avoidance eliminates hazards altogether, suitable for hazardous ventures. Loss control involves systematic efforts to prevent or minimize losses through safety measures and diversification. Risk retention, often employed in health insurance, involves self-funding or deductibles, thereby retaining some risk within the organization. Risk transfer predominantly occurs through insurance policies, shifting the financial burden to external parties (Crouhy, Galai & Mark, 2010).

Kallman advocates for the use of the risk management solution tree as an effective visual strategy for decision-making. The approach ensures that organizations consider all viable options to create value efficiently. Ultimately, he affirms the maxim that “prevention is worth a pound of insurance,” emphasizing that proactive loss prevention not only preserves assets and saves lives but also reduces overall risk management costs. Controlling the probability of losses through strategic measures is essential for organizational success, stability, and goal achievement (Anderson, 2005; Crouhy et al., 2010; Hopkin, 2013).

References

• Anderson, D. R. (2005). Corporate survival: The critical importance of sustainability risk management. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
• Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2010). Risk management. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Hopkin, P. (2013). Risk management. London: Kogan Page.
• Kallman, J. (2003). Who’s who in insurance and risk management. Dr. Kallman, Underwriter Print & Pub Co.
• Riscario. (2006). Promoting insurance literacy in Canada.
• Koester, F. (1912). Our Stupendous Yearly Waste: The Death Toll of Industry. The World's Work.
• Lebergott, S. (2002). Wages and working conditions. In D. R. Henderson (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Economics.
• Roughton, J. (2002). Developing an effective safety culture: A leadership approach. Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Viscusi, W. K. (2008). Job safety. In D. R. Henderson (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Economics.