Romans 12:2 NIV - Do Not Conform Any Longer ✓ Solved

In Romans 122 Niv You Are Told Do Not Conform Any Longer To The

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. Review Chapters 1 and 3 in Meeting the Ethical Challenge of Leadership textbook. Read Chapter 12 - Focusing on the Three Stages of a Crisis, Practice Transparency and Blowing the Whistle: Ethical Tension Points in Meeting the Ethical Challenge of Leadership textbook. Read White’s Biblical Principles. Read the article Whistle Blowing in the Public Sector. Visit Website: Whistleblower Protection. Choose and read two articles from the list below: Boeing Uber Wells Fargo Firestone Tire recall BP Deepwater oil spill Daraprim Turing Pharmaceuticals Atlanta School Scandal Starbucks Massive Admissions Scandal Volkswagen Theranos. Using MS Word, write a research paper with a minimum of 600 words discussing for each case: summarize the facts, identify the ethical and/or legal challenges, determine which type of shadow (as described in Chapter 1 of Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership) best describes each challenge, analyze how this shadow impacts stakeholders, discuss if the ethical challenge was brought to light by a whistleblower and whether whistleblowing was appropriate, evaluate the challenges using White’s five biblical business ethics principles, identify any violated principle, and demonstrate critical thinking. Ensure proper spelling, grammar, APA format, and cite at least five scholarly sources. Save your work as “LastName_EthicalDilemmas” and submit by the deadline.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Ethical dilemmas are prevalent in contemporary leadership, especially within the context of business scandals and organizational misconduct. These dilemmas often involve complex legal and moral challenges that can tarnish reputations and harm stakeholders. This paper examines two prominent cases—Wells Fargo's fraudulent account scandal and Theranos' blood-testing deception—to analyze the ethical and legal challenges faced by organizations, the type of shadows they represent, and how biblical principles can guide ethical decision-making.

Case 1: Wells Fargo Scandal

The Wells Fargo controversy emerged when it was revealed that employees, driven by sales targets, created millions of unauthorized accounts to meet aggressive sales goals. This fraudulent activity compromised customer trust and resulted in hefty fines and reputational damage. The ethical challenge stemmed from a culture that prioritized profits over integrity and honesty. Legally, the company faced multiple lawsuits, regulatory penalties, and loss of stakeholder confidence. The shadow associated with this case can be classified as a "Corruption Shadow," where greed and self-interest overshadow ethical standards, leading to misconduct that harms customers and shareholders.

The impact on stakeholders was significant. Customers suffered identity theft, financial loss, and breach of trust. Employees faced moral dilemmas, feeling pressured to meet unrealistic targets at the expense of integrity. The company's leadership bore responsibility for fostering a toxic culture that enabled such deception. Whistleblowers played a critical role in exposing these unethical practices, suggesting that whistleblowing was appropriate and necessary to rectify systemic issues and uphold ethical standards.

Using White’s biblical principles, this behavior violates the principle of “just weight,” which emphasizes fairness and honesty in business transactions. It also breaches the principle of "total honesty" and the concept of serving others, as exemplified by Christ's servant leadership. The scandal reveals a failure to uphold these biblical standards, highlighting the importance of integrating spiritual ethics into organizational culture.

Case 2: Theranos' Blood-Testing Deception

Theranos was a biotech company that falsely claimed to revolutionize blood testing with minimal samples and rapid results. Investigations uncovered that the technology did not work as claimed, and the company misled investors, regulators, and consumers. The ethical challenge involved dishonesty, deception, and potential harm to patients and investors. The legal challenges included fraud charges, lawsuits, and regulatory sanctions. The shadow most accurately associated with this case is the “Greed Shadow,” where the pursuit of profit and fame led to unethical deception and exploitation.

The stakeholders impacted include patients, who received potentially inaccurate test results, investors who lost substantial investments, and the company's employees who faced moral conflicts. Whistleblowers, including former employees, exposed the deception—highlighting the importance of ethical courage. Whistleblowing was deemed appropriate as it aimed to prevent further harm and uphold truthfulness.

Applying White’s biblical principles, the deception violates the principles of “total honesty,” “being a servant,” and “personal responsibility.” The breach of these principles demonstrates the importance of aligning business conduct with biblical standards that emphasize truth, humility, and accountability.

Conclusion

Both cases exemplify how unethical behavior rooted in greed, dishonesty, and self-interest can cause widespread harm. The shadows cast by these misconducts serve as cautionary tales underscoring the importance of ethical leadership grounded in biblical principles. Whistleblowing emerges as a vital mechanism for uncovering unethical practices and aligning corporate actions with moral standards. Incorporating biblical ethics into organizational culture can foster integrity, accountability, and service, ultimately promoting sustainable and morally sound business practices.

References

• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper.
• Graham, J. W. (2011). Faith and integrity in the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 317-330.
• White, J. (1978). Honesty, morality & conscience. NavPress.
• Gundersen, C. (2016). Ethical challenges in business: An application of biblical principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-243.
• Loe, T. W., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Houghton Mifflin.