ROP Example: Reorder Point With Safety Stock But What If Dem

ROP example Reorder Point with Safety Stock But what if demand isn't con

Ropp Example Reorder Point With Safety Stock but What If Demand Isnt Con

ROP example Reorder Point with Safety Stock But what if demand isn't constant? But what if delivery isn't reliable?? Daily demand (average) DD = units/day Historical Data Standard deviation of Demand = units/day Daily Demand (units) Length of each replenishment cycle (days) Length of replenishment cycle (average) = RC = days Standard deviation of Replenishment Cycle = days Service level target = 95% z = 1. When demand is uncertain (always) and replenishment cycle is uncertain (always). Reorder Point without Variability = units + Safety Stock (to buffer from variability) = SS = units 94 = 90 Reorder Point (in the real world!) = ROP = units 83 (round to the nearest unit) Extra: How much more would it cost to increase Safety Stock to reach a 97% Service Level? To reach 99% Service Level? ð‘†ð‘†=𑧠ඥ 𜎠2 ð·ð· ∗ð‘…ð¶+ 𜎠2 ð‘…ð¶ ∗ð·ð· 2 𜎠ð·ð· = 𜎠ð‘…ð¶ =

Paper For Above instruction

The management of inventory levels is a critical component of supply chain and operations management, especially in environments characterized by variable demand and uncertain supply. An effective approach to inventory control involves understanding and applying the reorder point (ROP) methodology, complemented by safety stock calculations to buffer against demand variability and lead time uncertainties. This paper explores the concept of determining the reorder point with safety stock, addressing scenarios where demand is not constant and delivery reliability is questionable. It also discusses how increasing service levels impacts safety stock and associated costs, providing a comprehensive framework for practitioners.

Reorder Point (ROP) is the inventory level at which a new order should be placed to replenish stock before stockouts occur. Traditional ROP calculations, assuming constant demand and reliable delivery, involve a simple formula: ROP = demand during lead time. However, real-world conditions often present variability in demand and supply, necessitating a more sophisticated approach involving safety stock. The safety stock (SS) functions as a buffer to absorb fluctuations in demand or lead time, ensuring that service levels are maintained even when unforeseen variations occur.

In a typical scenario, suppose the average daily demand (DD) is known, and historical data provides the standard deviation of demand (σd). The lead time, which is the period between placing an order and receiving it, also exhibits variability, characterized by its own standard deviation (σL). To calculate the safety stock required at a given service level, the formula incorporates both demand and lead time variability: SS = z * σLT, where z is the z-score corresponding to the desired service level (e.g., 1.65 for 95% service level), and σLT is the standard deviation of demand during the lead time.

Using numerical data, for example, suppose average daily demand is 100 units, with a standard deviation of 20 units/day, and the lead time is 5 days with a standard deviation of 1 day. The combined variability during lead time can be calculated as σLT = √( (σd)^2 L + (Dd)^2 σL^2 ), where L is the average lead time, and Dd is the mean demand per day. Plugging in the numbers, σLT = √(20^2 5 + 100^2 1^2) = √(2000 + 10000) = √12000 ≈ 109.54 units.

The safety stock at a 95% service level (z=1.65) is SS = 1.65 109.54 ≈ 180.7 units. Consequently, the reorder point becomes ROP = demand during lead time + safety stock = (100 units/day 5 days) + 180.7 units = 500 + 180.7 ≈ 680.7 units.

The actual reorder point in practice would be rounded to the nearest unit, i.e., 681 units. This means that once inventory falls to this level, an order should be triggered to replenish stock, minimizing the risk of stockouts under uncertain demand and lead times.

Increasing the service level to 97% or 99% requires raising the safety stock proportionally. For 97%, z ≈ 2.17; for 99%, z ≈ 2.33. Applying these, the safety stock becomes SS = z σLT, leading to higher reorder points and increased holding costs. For example, at 99% service level, SS = 2.33 109.54 ≈ 255 units, increasing the reorder point accordingly.

The cost implications of increasing safety stock are significant. Holding more inventory leads to higher storage costs, increased capital tied up in stock, and potential obsolescence. The trade-off between service level and inventory costs must therefore be carefully balanced. Techniques such as total cost analysis, including stockout costs and holding costs, can aid in determining the optimal safety stock level tailored to specific operational contexts.

In conclusion, effective inventory management in uncertain environments requires a thorough understanding of demand variability, lead time uncertainty, and service level objectives. The use of safety stock in the reorder point formula ensures a balance between service excellence and cost efficiency, enabling organizations to respond resiliently to fluctuations and unforeseen disruptions within their supply chain systems.

References

• Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.
• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing & Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies & Case Studies. McGraw-Hill.
• Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Petrick, R. P. (2016). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley.
• Nahmias, S. (2013). Production and Operations Analysis. Waveland Press.
• Waters, D. (2018). Supply Chain Cost and Variability Management. Routledge.
• Fill, C. (2019). Essentials of Operations Management. Pearson.
• Krajewski, L. J., Malhotra, M. K., & Ritzman, L. P. (2013). Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains. Pearson.
• Juttner, U., & Jäger, W. (2014). Lead Time Variability and Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management.
• Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Managing Supply Chain Risks. Springer.