RSCH 600 Term Paper Part 1: Due November 20

RSCH 600 Term Paper TERM PAPER PART 1: Due November 20, :00 pm

You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization (employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance. Choose your research topic thoughtfully, as this assignment will be part of your term paper.

HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS TERM PAPER (PART 1):

  • Title of your research: Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
  • Introduction/Background: Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about and how you came to be interested in it, following the Elements of a Proposal document.
  • Statement of the Problem: Detail the problem that you are considering. Address why this topic is important and why research needs to be conducted.
  • Purpose of the Study: Define the aim and objective of your study, including how you are delimiting the research, what you hope to learn, potential contributions, and benefits to stakeholders.
  • Research Question: Develop focused research questions, including a backup question, and ensure scope is reasonable.
  • Research Hypothesis: State a couple of hypotheses to test based on your proposed study.
  • Information Sources: Identify sources such as journals, books, internet resources, government documents, or people needed to answer your questions. Ensure your questions are answerable and sources are accessible.

II: LITERATURE REVIEW and LITERATURE MAP

The purpose is to develop skills in finding valid literary resources. You will create an annotated bibliography of at least 15 relevant digital sources, summarize and evaluate their connection to your study, critique similarities and differences, identify literature gaps, and provide recommendations. Design a literature map to organize your sources, facilitating the writing of your review. Aim for at least 30 sources for your final proposal, citing all in APA style.

III: RESEARCH METHODS

Develop skills in selecting appropriate methods and drafting a work plan. Write up to 5 pages outlining:

  1. Methods planned to answer research questions, including instruments, variables, sources, and rationale for methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, experiments, document analysis). Explain if using mixed methods and why.
  2. Types of data to be collected, with alternative data collection methods considered.
  3. Details about research participants or target audience, sampling methods, and number of participants, including the benefits of the research.
  4. Data analysis approaches, validation of findings, and how outcomes will be validated.
  5. Ethical considerations, potential biases, and strategies to address them. Cite at least five sources for this section.

This part of the assignment emphasizes thorough planning, ethical research practices, and clear articulation of methods aligned with your research questions.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective research proposal development begins with rigorous planning and organization across key components: a compelling title, background understanding, a clear problem statement, well-defined purpose, focused research questions and hypotheses, comprehensive literature review, and robust research methods. This structured approach not only facilitates a logical progression of ideas but also ensures credibility and feasibility of the proposed study.

Introduction and Background

The research process initiates with identifying a relevant topic that aligns with personal interests or organizational needs. The background section contextualizes the issue, highlighting its significance and the motivation behind choosing it. For example, a researcher interested in remote work productivity might explore how digital tools impact employee efficiency, noting the surge in remote work due to technological advancements and global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Statement of the Problem

This component specifies the core issue, emphasizing its importance to stakeholders. For instance, organizations seek to optimize remote work policies to enhance productivity, yet face challenges in measuring digital collaboration effectiveness. The problem statement articulates these challenges, substantiates their relevance, and delineates the necessity for dedicated research to inform evidence-based solutions.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose articulates what the research aims to achieve, addressing delimitation and anticipated contributions. Continuing the previous example, the purpose might be to evaluate the impact of digital communication tools on remote employee productivity, with the goal of providing actionable recommendations for organizations. The research should clarify scope boundaries, such as focusing on specific industries or tools, while outlining how findings could benefit organizations, employees, and the broader society by enhancing remote work strategies.

Research Question and Hypotheses

Formulating precise research questions is vital. For instance, “How does the use of digital communication tools influence employee productivity in remote work settings?” A backup question could be, “What are the specific features of communication tools that most significantly affect productivity?” Accompanying hypotheses might posit that increased digital collaboration correlates positively with productivity, or that certain tools are more effective within particular organizational contexts. These must be answerable within the scope, ensuring feasibility.

Sources of Information

Collecting relevant, accessible data is crucial. Sources include peer-reviewed journals, industry reports, government publications, and expert interviews. Ensuring data access involves verifying subscriptions, permissions, or contacts. The research questions should lead to sources providing reliable, comprehensive evidence, like studies on remote work productivity outcomes or technology adoption rates.

Literature Review and Map

The literature review synthesizes current research, highlights agreements or discrepancies, and uncovers gaps. For example, prior studies might agree that communication tools improve efficiency but differ on which features are most impactful. Identifying these gaps informs future research directions. A literature map visually organizes sources by themes or methodologies, helping streamline the review process. Presenting at least 15 sources with 30 planned for the final proposal ensures depth and breadth of understanding, supported with APA citations.

Research Methods

Methodological choices depend on research questions. Quantitative surveys might measure productivity KPIs, while qualitative interviews could explore user experiences. Mixed methods may be employed sequentially (e.g., preliminary survey followed by interviews) or concurrently. Data collection types include questionnaires, digital logs, interview transcripts, or organizational reports.

Participants may include remote workers across industries, sampled via stratified random sampling or purposive sampling, depending on research aims. The required sample size balances statistical power with practical constraints.

Data analysis might involve statistical tests for numerical data or thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Validating findings involves triangulation, peer review, or pilot testing tools. Ethical considerations include ensuring confidentiality, informed consent, and bias mitigation strategies such as reflexivity and method triangulation.

By strategically incorporating these components, a research proposal becomes a comprehensive plan capable of yielding valuable insights and guiding successful investigations.

References

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
  • Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). "Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research agenda on interventions." Decision Sciences, 44(2), 225–266.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). "Fourth Generation Evaluation." Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Madison, D. S. (2011). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. SAGE Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

Related Assignments