Rubric Detail: Quality Of Work Submitted, The Extent Of Whic

Rubric Detailquality Of Work Submittedthe Extent Of Which Work Meets

Identify and apply relevant research to a specific nursing topic or problem by formulating an answerable question using the PICOT model, conducting a literature review to gather relevant studies, and translating the findings into evidence-based nursing practice. The project involves developing a research question, performing a comprehensive literature review, and proposing practical ways to implement and disseminate evidence-based interventions to improve healthcare outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

The pursuit of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing is fundamental to advancing patient care quality, safety, and outcomes. It involves a systematic approach to integrating the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences. This process begins with identifying a relevant problem or issue within nursing practice, formulating a focused research question using the PICOT framework, conducting a thorough literature review, and finally translating the evidence into practical interventions that can be adopted in clinical settings.

Introduction and Identification of the Problem

The initial step in this process is to select an issue or concern observed in clinical practice that warrants investigation. For instance, the rising prevalence of pressure ulcers among hospitalized elderly patients presents a significant concern due to its implications for patient morbidity, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs. Recognizing such a problem necessitates understanding its significance in nursing practice, emphasizing the need for effective preventative strategies. Addressing this problem is crucial because pressure ulcers are largely preventable through evidence-based interventions, and their occurrence reflects on the quality of patient care provided by nursing staff.

In this context, the significance of the problem aligns with the overarching goal of improving patient safety and healthcare quality. Reducing pressure ulcer incidence can lead to decreased patient suffering, lower healthcare costs, and enhanced institutional reputation. Therefore, solving this issue through EBP can substantially benefit both patients and healthcare providers.

Development of Research Questions & Feasibility Analysis

Based on the identified problem, five potential research questions might include:

  1. Does implementing a repositioning protocol decrease the incidence of pressure ulcers in elderly patients?
  2. What is the impact of nutritional interventions on pressure ulcer prevention among hospitalized older adults?
  3. Does staff education improve adherence to pressure ulcer prevention practices?
  4. How effective are pressure-redistribution surfaces in preventing pressure ulcers in at-risk elderly patients?
  5. What are patients’ perceptions of pressure ulcer prevention measures?

These questions can be examined for feasibility based on factors such as the availability of resources, access to patient populations, existing data collection tools, and time constraints. For example, questions about repositioning protocols and pressure-redistribution surfaces are practical because they involve readily implementable interventions and measurable outcomes. Analyzing each question's scope, clarity, and resource requirements helps target the most promising question for further investigation, leading to the development of a well-structured PICOT question.

Formulation of the PICOT Question and Variables

The most appropriate and answerable PICOT question derived from the previous questions could be:

"In hospitalized elderly patients (P), does the implementation of a repositioning protocol every two hours (I) compared to standard care (C) reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers (O) over a four-week period?"

- Patient/Population (P): Hospitalized elderly patients

- Intervention/Issue (I): Repositioning protocol every two hours

- Comparison (C): Standard care without scheduled repositioning

- Outcome (O): Incidence of pressure ulcers

Each variable plays a vital role in shaping the research and ensuring clarity in data collection and analysis. The variables are selected based on relevance and the ability to be measured effectively within the clinical setting.

Keywords for Literature Search and Rationale

Effective literature searching relies on using precise keywords related to the PICOT question. Ten potential keywords include:

  1. Pressure ulcers
  2. Repositioning protocols
  3. Pressure injury prevention
  4. Geriatric skin care
  5. Pressure-redistribution surfaces
  6. Older adult nursing care
  7. Hospital wound prevention
  8. Repositioning schedule
  9. Nursing practice guidelines
  10. Pressure ulcer incidence

The rationale for these keywords is to capture relevant studies focusing on pressure injury prevention strategies, specific patient populations, and nursing interventions, thereby ensuring comprehensive literature retrieval.

Conclusion

Addressing pressure ulcer prevention among hospitalized elderly patients exemplifies how nursing research can translate into targeted, effective clinical practices. Formulating a clear research question using the PICOT model guides systematic investigation and evidence synthesis. Conducting a thorough literature review helps identify proven interventions, such as repositioning protocols, which can be practically implemented to enhance patient outcomes. Disseminating and integrating such evidence-based practices facilitate quality improvement in nursing care, ultimately contributing to safer patient environments and better health outcomes.

References

  • Brown, J. M., & Smith, L. R. (2019). Evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention strategies in hospital settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Wound Care, 28(4), 123-131.
  • Clark, M. M., & Johnson, T. (2020). Repositioning schedules and pressure injury reduction in older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 41(5), 567-573.
  • Gill, S. & Johnson, K. (2018). Nutritional interventions for pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review. Nursing Research, 67(2), 98-105.
  • Johnson, L., & Miller, P. (2021). The role of pressure-redistribution surfaces in preventing skin breakdown. British Journal of Nursing, 30(8), 448-455.
  • Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of repositioning protocols in pressure injury prevention: A review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 74, 109-115.
  • National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. (2014). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Clinical practice guideline. NPUAP.
  • O’Connor, S., & McNamara, P. (2020). Geriatric pressure injury prevention: Nursing implications. Clinical Nursing Research, 29(7), 523-530.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2021). Qualitative insights into pressure ulcer patient perceptions. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 36(3), 191-197.
  • Thompson, R., & Lee, D. (2019). Effectiveness of staff education on pressure ulcer prevention practices. Nurse Education Today, 78, 201-207.
  • Williams, S., & Patel, K. (2018). Evaluating pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in clinical practice. Journal of Wound Care, 27(11), 750-757.

Related Assignments