Rubric For Literature Review: Dimensions, Competent, Needs I

Rubric For Literature Reviewdimensions Competent Needs Improvement Una

The instructions and grading criteria for a literature review are specified, focusing on the introduction, body, discussion, conclusions, and references. The assignment requires a comprehensive literature review that includes a clear introduction with the problem statement and PICOT question, a summary of at least three studies including their purpose, procedures, and findings, a discussion that synthesizes the findings and discusses implications or areas for further research, and proper APA formatting for all references. The review must be well-organized, thoroughly developed, and supported by credible scholarly sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Title: Literature Review on [Insert Topic Here]

Introduction

The introduction of a literature review serves as a gateway for readers to understand the core problem and context of the research topic. It should include a clear statement of the problem, emphasizing its significance within the field or practice area. Additionally, the introduction must briefly outline the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) question that guides the review, establishing the focus of the research, and provide background definitions necessary for understanding the topic.

In this review, the significance of exploring [insert topic] lies in its potential impact on [discuss implications, e.g., patient outcomes, healthcare practices, educational strategies, etc.]. Providing a background outline helps situate the reader and prepares them to comprehend the study findings and their relevance.

Body

The body constitutes the core of the literature review where findings from at least three relevant studies are summarized. Each study should be briefly described, including its purpose, methodology (procedures for data collection), and major findings. This section demonstrates a scholarly understanding of the existing research, highlighting similarities, differences, and gaps.

For example, Study 1 by Smith et al. (2020) examined the effects of intervention X on outcome Y among population Z, using a randomized controlled trial with a sample size of N. The major findings indicated that intervention X significantly improved outcome Y, suggesting potential benefits for clinical practice. Similarly, Study 2 by Johnson (2019) employed a qualitative methodology to explore patient experiences with intervention X, revealing important insights regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation. Study 3 by Lee and Kim (2018) conducted a systematic review on recent research, concluding that intervention X is evidence-based and effective across various settings.

This synthesis allows the reader to see the landscape of current research, identify trends, and note where further investigation is required.

Discussion

The discussion synthesizes the information presented in the body, emphasizing the most critical findings while establishing their relevance. It should articulate how these findings support or challenge current practice or understanding, and explore implications for clinical or practical application. This section should also identify gaps in the existing literature and suggest areas for further research to address unresolved issues or emerging questions.

In this review, the convergence of findings across studies supports the hypothesis that intervention X positively impacts outcome Y. However, discrepancies in methodologies and populations suggest that future research should focus on standardized protocols and diverse sample groups to validate these outcomes further. The implications of these findings highlight the importance of integrating intervention X into practice to improve outcomes, though considerations regarding resource availability and training must be addressed.

Conclusions

The conclusion should succinctly summarize the core insights derived from the literature review, reinforced by the synthesis provided in the discussion. It should restate the significance of the findings, emphasizing their practical or theoretical implications. Additionally, proposing areas for future research underscores the ongoing nature of scholarly inquiry and the need for continued investigation into the topic.

For example, future studies could examine the long-term effects of intervention X, explore its applicability among different populations, or develop standardized guidelines for implementation. Concluding remarks should reinforce the importance of the topic and the value of current research efforts in advancing knowledge and practice.

References

  • Smith, J., Adams, R., & Brown, T. (2020). Effects of intervention X on outcome Y: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Healthcare Research, 15(3), 214-223.
  • Johnson, L. (2019). Patient experiences with intervention X: A qualitative study. Nursing Perspectives, 24(2), 112-119.
  • Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2018). Effectiveness of intervention X: A systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Practice, 12(4), 45-56.
  • Additional credible sources relevant to the topic to support comprehensive understanding and context.

References

  • Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the source. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages.
  • Author, D. D., & Author, E. E. (Year). Title of the source. Publisher or Journal Name.
  • Author, F. F. (Year). Title of the article or book. DOI or URL if applicable.

Related Assignments