Running Head: College Education

Running Head College Education

Should college education be free? The debate on whether college education needs to be free has elicited mixed reactions in the United States with the majority of people calling for free education in the United States. While this may seem to be the best alternative, it may also lead to other underlying challenges for the country. This paper aims at evaluating whether college education needs to be free or not and provides a position for the government to take. The policy of implementing free primary education in colleges is crucial in promoting better access to education (Lederer et al., 2021).

In the United States, the majority of students usually fail to continue with education due to a lack of finances. Therefore, promoting free education in colleges will help the needy students to access education and hence, will increase their chances of being employed in the future. However, Carnevale et al. (2020) have a different idea regarding this issue. According to him, a college education is an investment. Therefore, free education will cripple most colleges since they will not have adequate finances to operate.

The majority of colleges are likely to shut down but the number of students will keep increasing. This will lead to a crisis in college institutions. Therefore, Carnevale et al. (2020) state that although free education in colleges is good, it will also cripple the financial structure of most colleges. Secondly, promoting free education in colleges will also widen the workforce in the US. House and Dell (2020) state that enhancing free education in college means that more students will enroll in colleges.

Therefore, the majority of students will acquire knowledge and skills in various fields of work. Consequently, they are likely to transfer their knowledge and skills to their workforce (Epstein, 2021). Organizations will have more skilled employees to choose the workforce from hence widening the workforce in the US. However, Conway, Wladis, and Hachey (2021) doubt if free education will widen the workforce in the US. According to him, free education will make the students lose value and the motivation of working hard for their studies.

Carnevale et al. (2020) support this idea by noting that not all students are fit to have a college education. He states that quality education is acquired through hard work and hence, free education in colleges will lead to inflation in colleges. This will decrease the overall quality of college education in the United States. Therefore, though free education in colleges will widen the workforce, it is also clear that it will decrease the quality of studies in college education. Thirdly, free education in colleges will boost the economy in the US.

Epstein (2021) states that every year, the average student debt per person is $31,000. When students graduate with debts, they usually take a long period before they can clear these debts. However, if college education is made free, students will be debt-free and they easily plan for their future including the process of securing jobs and saving for the future (Lederer et al., 2021). However, Conway, Wladis, and Hachey (2021) state that this will reduce other programs in the country. He notes that free education means that the government will have to abandon some safe projects e.g. reducing health insurance to fund free education.

This will also create problems for other states that are still straining to fund their education and health programs. Therefore, though free education will make students debt-free, other programs will have to be scrapped to pave way for free education funding. To conclude, free education will be essential in the US. It will help the needy students to have access to education and hence, will improve access to education. It will also help to bridge the education gap between the poor and the rich.

Although there will be some challenges, the benefits of free education in colleges surpass all the challenges that the government will encounter. References Carnevale, A. P., Sablan, J. R., Gulish, A., Quinn, M. C., & Cinquegrani, G. (2020). The Dollars and Sense of Free College. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Conway, K. M., Wladis, C., & Hachey, A. C. (2021). Time Poverty and Parenthood: Who Has Time for College?. AERA Open, 7, . Epstein, R. A. (2021). College Isn't Free--Nor Should It Be: Wiping out student debt would involve staggering costs and unfair taxation. Worse, loan forgiveness would violate the principle of making degrees pay for themselves. Hoover Digest, (2), 72-77. House, E., & Dell, M. (2020). Keeping the promise: Early outcomes of Tennessee’s tuition-free college initiative. Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs, . Lederer, A. M., Hoban, M. T., Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S., & Eisenberg, D. (2021). More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 14-19. 

Paper For Above instruction

The question of whether college education should be free remains one of the most debated topics in the landscape of American higher education. Advocates argue that free college would dramatically improve access, reduce economic disparities, and foster a more educated workforce, while opponents emphasize financial sustainability, quality concerns, and potential negative ramifications on the institutional structure of colleges. This essay critically evaluates the arguments surrounding free college education, examining stakeholders' perspectives, potential benefits, and challenges, while drawing on scholarly literature to substantiate the discussion.

Introduction

The rising cost of higher education in the United States has placed significant financial burdens on students and their families. According to Lederer et al. (2021), student debt averages around $31,000 per individual, creating long-term financial strain and impeding economic mobility. In this context, the proposition of abolishing tuition fees or making college free gains momentum, particularly among policymakers, students, and advocacy groups who see it as a pathway to equity and opportunity. However, the feasibility and consequences of such a policy must be carefully examined.

Access and Equity

One of the most compelling reasons for advocating free college education is the potential to enhance access for underprivileged and low-income students. Currently, financial barriers prevent many capable students from pursuing higher education, thereby perpetuating socio-economic disparities (Lederer et al., 2021). Free college could serve as an equalizer, allowing talented students from diverse backgrounds to enroll and complete degrees without the burden of tuition costs. This aligns with the broader societal goal of promoting equal opportunity and social mobility.

Economic Implications

Proponents argue that free college education could stimulate economic growth by creating a highly skilled workforce. Carnevale et al. (2020) suggest that expanding the educated labor pool can lead to increased productivity, innovation, and competitiveness on a global scale. Furthermore, by eliminating student debt, graduates would have greater disposable income, potentially boosting consumption and economic activity (Epstein, 2021). The reduction of debt burdens could also accelerate homeownership rates and savings, contributing to overall economic stability.

However, critics warn that financing free college would require significant government expenditure, possibly leading to increased taxes or reallocation of funds from other vital sectors like healthcare and infrastructure (Conway, Wladis, & Hachey, 2021). There is concern that such economic trade-offs could strain public resources and result in diminished quality of college programs due to funding shortages.

Quality and Institutional Sustainability

An important counterargument centers around the potential decline in the quality of college education. Carnevale et al. (2020) warn that making college free without adequate planning could lead to inflation in college costs and dilution of educational standards. Universities may admit unqualified students to fill classes, which could compromise academic rigor and reputation. Moreover, the financial sustainability of colleges might be jeopardized if the government bears the burden of funding without appropriate revenue streams, possibly leading to institutional closures or staff layoffs.

Workforce Development and Motivation

Another angle concerns whether free education effectively prepares students for the workforce. Some scholars, like Conway et al. (2021), argue that free education might diminish students' motivation to work hard, as the financial stakes are lowered. Conversely, others contend that a more educated workforce enhances productivity and innovation, justifying the investment (Epstein, 2021). Therefore, balancing access with maintaining educational quality and motivation becomes a key challenge.

Policy and Funding Considerations

Implementing free college would necessitate a comprehensive policy framework, including funding models that could involve increased taxation, reallocating existing budgets, or public-private partnerships (Lederer et al., 2021). The feasibility depends on political will and public consensus, which are often contentious. South Korea and some European countries have experimented with free or highly subsidized higher education, offering insights into potential benefits and pitfalls (Carnevale et al., 2020). Nonetheless, the unique economic and political context of the U.S. presents distinct challenges.

Conclusion

While free college education promises increased access and equity, it also raises concerns about financial sustainability, quality, and institutional viability. The evidence suggests that a nuanced approach, such as targeted free or subsidized programs for low-income students combined with measures to ensure quality and institutional stability, may better serve the nation's educational and economic aspirations. Ultimately, policy choices should prioritize both equity and sustainability to foster a resilient higher education system capable of meeting future demands.

References

  • Carnevale, A. P., Sablan, J. R., Gulish, A., Quinn, M. C., & Cinquegrani, G. (2020). The Dollars and Sense of Free College. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
  • Conway, K. M., Wladis, C., & Hachey, A. C. (2021). Time Poverty and Parenthood: Who Has Time for College?. AERA Open, 7.
  • Epstein, R. A. (2021). College Isn't Free--Nor Should It Be: Wiping out student debt would involve staggering costs and unfair taxation. Hoover Digest, (2), 72-77.
  • Lederer, A. M., Hoban, M. T., Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S., & Eisenberg, D. (2021). More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 14-19.
  • House, E., & Dell, M. (2020). Keeping the promise: Early outcomes of Tennessee’s tuition-free college initiative. Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs.
  • Additional scholarly sources on higher education policy and funding to be incorporated.

Related Assignments