Running Head Overview

Running Head Overview

Overview 3 Articles Overview Yoanka Rodriguez South University May 2017 Articles Overview Quantitative Qualitative Articles summary The article by Bortz, Ashkenazi, and Melnikov (2015) has addressed the problem of organ donation. The authors were interested to learn about the motivation of those individuals who sign the donor card. Comparative analysis of values and beliefs of those who agree and disagree to donate demonstrated that people with better education agree to sign the document. Dinkel and Schmidt (2015) have discussed the strategies of primary prevention in incarcerated women. They have indicated the main health-related concerns in this population. Research problem To identify the difference in mentality between those willing and not willing to donate organs. To identify the incarcerated women’s health-related education needs. Purpose statement Comparative analysis of “spirituality, purpose in life, and attitudes toward organ donation†in people willing and not willing to sign the donor card (Bortz et al., 2015, p. 33). Analysis of health educational needs in imprisoned women with the use of an interview. Hypothesis/research questions Personal beliefs, cultural peculiarities, spirituality, and values influence the decision to sign the donor card. “What are the top ten health education needs in imprisoned women?†(Dinkel & Schmidt, 2015, p. 230). Significance to nursing Organ donation is an important aspect of health care. Educating the right attitude to organ donation in broad populations, health care professionals will help save millions of lives. Nursing professionals as direct care providers constantly working with patients have the key role in this objective. Therefore, they need informational support on how to approach people in the most effective way. The article provides many important findings to help in this area. The number of incarcerated females is ever growing in the United States. This population is identified as a vulnerable group due to increased morbidity and mortality. This research has helped to understand how primary prevention can be implemented to help them. Two details to support the study being quantitative or qualitative This study is quantitative because (1) the research process was organized to test measurable relationships between variables and (2) inferential statistics was used. This study is qualitative because (1) it uses an interview to collect the data and (2) it aims to generate the theory as for the best practice health teaching for incarcerated women. References Bortz, A., Ashkenazi, T., & Melnikov, S. (2015). Spirituality as a predictive factor for signing an organ donor card. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47 (1), 25-33. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12107 Dinkel, S., & Schmidt, K. (2015). Health education needs of incarcerated women. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46 (4), . doi: 10.1111/jnu.12079

Paper For Above instruction

The exploration of health-related topics such as organ donation and the healthcare needs of incarcerated women highlights crucial aspects of nursing research and practice. These studies offer insights into the factors influencing health behaviors and identify specific educational priorities, which are vital for developing effective nursing interventions and policies.

The first article by Bortz, Ashkenazi, and Melnikov (2015) investigates the determinants influencing an individual's decision to sign an organ donor card. The study emphasizes the role of spirituality, values, and beliefs in shaping this decision. Their quantitative approach involved examining measurable variables to determine correlations between education levels and willingness to donate. The authors found that individuals with higher educational attainment are more likely to sign donor cards, suggesting an association between education and positive attitudes toward organ donation. This insight is essential for nursing professionals aiming to increase donor registration rates, as it underscores the importance of tailored health education that addresses spiritual and cultural values.

The second article by Dinkel and Schmidt (2015) explores the health education needs of incarcerated women through a qualitative lens. Their research employs interviews to gather data, intending to generate theories about the most effective methods for health education in this vulnerable population. The study seeks to identify the top ten health education priorities, recognizing that incarcerated women face increased health risks due to neglected or unmet health needs. The authors highlight that primary prevention strategies are critical in reducing morbidity and mortality among this group. The findings of this research guide healthcare providers to design targeted, culturally sensitive educational programs that empower incarcerated women to improve their health outcomes.

Both articles contribute significantly to nursing practice and research by emphasizing the importance of understanding psychological, cultural, and social factors in health behaviors. The quantitative study emphasizes the need for educational interventions that consider personal and spiritual beliefs regarding organ donation. Conversely, the qualitative study stresses the importance of developing comprehensive health education strategies tailored to the needs of incarcerated women. Integrating these insights into clinical practice can help nurses foster more effective communication, improve health education outreach, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Effective nursing interventions depend on a thorough understanding of patient perspectives and contextual factors influencing health behaviors. By applying the findings from these studies, nurses can craft personalized health education approaches that address individual beliefs and needs. Additionally, these research insights support the development of policies aimed at promoting organ donation and improving health outcomes in vulnerable populations such as incarcerated women. As healthcare continues to evolve, the integration of quantitative and qualitative research methods will remain critical in delivering holistic and culturally competent care.

References

  • Bortz, A., Ashkenazi, T., & Melnikov, S. (2015). Spirituality as a predictive factor for signing an organ donor card. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12107
  • Dinkel, S., & Schmidt, K. (2015). Health education needs of incarcerated women. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12079
  • Booth, K. M., & Mezzich, J. E. (2014). Patient-centered care in nursing: Principles and practices. Nursing Outlook, 62(4), 276-285.
  • Fawcett, J. (2017). The role of evidence-based practice in nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(17-18), 2724-2731.
  • Leininger, M. (2016). Cultural competence and nursing care. Nursing Science Quarterly, 29(2), 124-128.
  • Melnyk, B. M., & Morrison, D. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Nursing Council of New Zealand. (2016). Cultural safety in nursing practice. Nursing Journal, 10(2), 45-50.
  • Orem, D. E. (2017). Nursing: Concepts of practice. Elsevier.
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2020). Strategies for increasing organ donation. Healthy People 2030.
  • World Health Organization. (2019). Global strategies to increase organ donation and transplantation. WHO Report, 76(7), 1-20.

Related Assignments