Running Head Research Strategy 1 For Teachers

Running Head Research Strategy1research Strategy1teachers Comment

Develop a comprehensive research strategy, including formulating a research question, selecting an appropriate methodology, detailing data collection techniques, and planning data analysis. The strategy should be relevant to your research topic and demonstrate understanding of mixed-method research design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Clearly justify each step and explain how you will gather, analyze, and interpret data to address your research question effectively.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing a robust research strategy is vital for the success of any scholarly investigation, particularly when exploring complex societal issues such as homelessness. My research aims to investigate how economic, political, and social factors influence homelessness patterns in San Francisco, a city with a notable homeless population and a plethora of influencing variables. Crafting an effective research strategy involves formulating a precise research question, selecting suitable methodologies, defining data collection techniques, and establishing a plan for data analysis and interpretation. This integrated approach ensures that the research findings are valid, reliable, and insightful, providing a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted issue at hand.

The research question central to this study is: "How do the economic, political, and social factors affect homelessness patterns in San Francisco?" This question is designed to capture the multidimensional nature of homelessness by examining various influencing factors. To address this research question adequately, I will adopt a mixed-method research design, uniting qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide depth and breadth in understanding the phenomenon.

Methodology and Justification

The mixed-method research design is particularly suited for this study because it combines the strengths of qualitative and quantitative research. According to Schoonenboom and Johnson (2017), this approach facilitates a comprehensive understanding of real-world contexts by integrating numerical data and subjective experiences. Quantitative methods allow measurement of the extent and frequency of homelessness and related variables, while qualitative methods shed light on personal experiences and contextual factors that influence individual circumstances.

Quantitative methodology focuses on empirical data collection and statistical analysis, making it effective for measuring variables such as the number of homeless individuals affected by economic, social, and political factors. Data collection will involve counting affected populations through surveys and demographic data analysis, complemented by statistical tools like SPSS for data analysis (Avella, 2016). This will enable testing hypotheses and exploring correlations, such as whether certain socio-economic groups are disproportionately represented among the homeless in San Francisco.

Qualitative methodology, on the other hand, provides contextual insights into personal experiences and societal perceptions. I will gather qualitative data through unstructured interviews, field observations, and focus groups to explore how homeless individuals perceive the impact of economic, social, and political changes. This approach aligns with Leavy (2017), who emphasizes qualitative methods' ability to uncover meaning and understanding within complex social phenomena. For example, interviews with homeless individuals and social service providers will reveal personal narratives about the challenges faced and systemic issues contributing to homelessness.

Data Collection Procedures

The data collection process will involve multiple techniques to ensure comprehensive data gathering. For quantitative data, I will use structured questionnaires distributed to homeless populations and relevant agencies, collecting numerical data on socio-economic indicators, demographic characteristics, and housing status. Observations will be conducted to document real-time conditions and interactions, providing contextual information that supports quantitative data.

Qualitative data will be gathered through semi-structured interviews with homeless individuals, social workers, and policymakers. Focus groups will facilitate discussions among community members and service providers to identify perceived causes and solutions. These methods will provide rich, detailed data that contextualize statistical findings and facilitate nuanced interpretations of the data.

Data Analysis Plan

Data analysis will incorporate statistical techniques using SPSS to interpret quantitative variables, explore correlations, and test hypotheses related to socio-economic influences on homelessness. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographic data, while inferential statistics such as chi-square tests and multiple regressions will examine relationships among variables.

Qualitative data will be analyzed through thematic analysis, as suggested by Leavy (2017). This involves coding the transcripts for recurring themes, concepts, and patterns related to economic, social, and political influences. Word occurrence tracking and content analysis will aid in identifying dominant narratives or perceptions. Combining these methods allows for a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena, where quantitative data indicate patterns, and qualitative data explain underlying reasons.

Interpretation and Reporting

The interpretation phase will involve synthesizing findings from both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Graphs, tables, and narrative descriptions will be used to present the results. Quantitative data will be visualized through bar graphs, pie charts, and correlation matrices, providing a clear depiction of patterns and relationships. Qualitative insights will be illustrated with coded themes and exemplary quotes, enriching the quantitative findings with contextual meaning.

This integrated data will be critically analyzed to answer the research question comprehensively. For example, statistical correlations showing a link between economic decline and rising homelessness can be contextualized with personal stories illustrating how economic hardship affects individuals’ lives. Similarly, social and political factors such as housing policies or urban development plans will be examined alongside community perspectives to provide a holistic view of the issue.

Conclusion

In sum, my research strategy employs a mixed-method approach, justified by its capacity to comprehensively explore the multifaceted influences on homelessness in San Francisco. By combining quantitative data on prevalence and correlations with qualitative insights into personal experiences and societal perceptions, this approach facilitates a thorough understanding that can inform policy and intervention strategies. Careful planning of data collection, analysis, and interpretation ensures the validity of findings and their relevance to addressing homelessness effectively.

References

  • Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11(1).
  • Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
  • Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2).
  • Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues, and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5.
  • Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
  • Mikkelsen, M. F., Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2017). Managing employee motivation: Exploring the connections between managers’ enforcement actions, employee perceptions, and employee intrinsic motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(2).
  • Antoni, C. H., Baeten, X., Perkins, S. J., Shaw, J. D., & Vartiainen, M. (2017). Reward management: Linking employee motivation and organizational performance. MBA 6001, Organizational Research and Theory.
  • Feurer, R., & Chaharbaghi, K. (1997). Strategy development: Past, present and future. Training for Quality, 5(2), 58-70.
  • Verle, K., Markic, M., Kodric, B., & Gorenc Zoran, A. (2014). Managerial competencies and organizational structures. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6).
  • Gonzalez, C. (2015). Analyzing homelessness: Social policies and urban development. Urban Studies Journal, 52(3), 546-561.

Related Assignments