Running Head: The Lottery
Running Head The Lottery
The Lottery 2 THE LOTTERY NAME UNIVERSITY AFFILIATION DETAILS The Lottery After reading the “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, I was quick to discover the key theme of danger of tradition. The characters in this story blindly follows these traditions because, that’s how things were done there. The village lottery leads to violent killings each year. This bizarre rituals indicate how dangerous tradition can become when people happen to follow it blindly. Before I understand what rituals they were conducting, their preparations seemed to be harmless and they also selected a pathetic man to lead the lottery.
Kids run up and down looking for stones in the city square (123helpme.com, 2016). Every individual seems occupied with a small black box that contains some slip papers which are made by hands. Tradition links small towns bringing together families and generations. The writer indicated that, the villagers do not understand where the lottery came from, but they were purposed to preserve the tradition regardless what it took them (Sparknotes.com, 2016). Their acceptance of lottery has led them to commit murder atrocities that this becomes the way of the town.
Depending with the way they are portrayed, they feel prowess to change and funny enough, there is no one forcing them to keep these traditions. When these people who are just ordinary individuals come from their homes. Before they return to their homes for lunch, they commit murder just because they are told to. They have no good reason for killing but since no body questions them, they have nothing to fear. Traditions here are used as the justification to commit murder (Sparknotes.com, 2016).
My question is, why were the persecutions random including children? References 123helpme.com, . (2016). The Lottery, Shirley Jackson -- Morals and Values in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson. Retrieved 24 January 2016, from Sparknotes.com, . (2016). SparkNotes: The Lottery: Themes, Motifs, and Symbols. Retrieved 24 January 2016, from
Paper For Above instruction
The short story "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson poignantly exposes the sinister facets of blindly following tradition without questioning its morality or purpose. The story is set in a seemingly idyllic small town where the residents participate annually in a lottery that ultimately leads to a shocking act of violence: the stoning death of one of their own. This narrative explores one of the most disturbing themes in societal behavior—the peril of unquestioned tradition—and prompts readers to reconsider how societal habits can escalate into immoral acts when unquestioned and unchallenged.
At first glance, the villagers' participation in the lottery appears harmless, even communal. Children can be seen running and playing with stones in the town square, while adults carefully select slips of paper from a black box (Jackson, 1948). The black box, with its faded and torn appearance, symbolizes the weight of tradition—ancient, outdated, yet still revered by the community. The villagers have continued this practice because they are accustomed to it; generations have passed down the ritual, and its origin has become obscure (SparkNotes, 2016). Nonetheless, the tradition persists, regardless of its brutality, as the town inhabitants blindly preserve it, often without questioning its relevance or morality (Jackson, 1948).
The narrative suggests that the townspeople are not coerced into maintaining the ritual but follow it out of a sense of duty and habit. Even though the villagers do not fully understand the origins of the lottery or the logic behind it, they adhere to it because tradition demands it. This unquestioning compliance underscores the story’s critique of societal conformity—individuals often follow norms simply because "that’s how things have always been." The fact that the ritual culminates in the death of an innocent person, often a chosen "villager," highlights how tradition can be used to justify heinous acts, such as murder, under the guise of social cohesion (Jackson, 1948; SparkNotes, 2016).
One of the most disturbing aspects of the story is the randomness with which victims are chosen, including children. The lottery does not discriminate based on age, gender, or social standing; even a child like Nelson Hutchinson, who protests against the ritual, is ultimately not spared (Jackson, 1948). This randomness dehumanizes the victims, emphasizing how societal pressures can strip individuals of their autonomy and moral judgment (Lodge, 2009). The inclusion of children in the violence underscores the ingrained acceptance of brutality—an inheritance from tradition that affects all age groups equally. This raises critical questions about the morality of societal customs and how violence can become normalized when embedded within cultural rituals (Sherman, 1988).
The story's critique extends beyond the immediate act of violence to address the broader implications of conformity and tradition. Jackson exposes the human tendency to adhere to longstanding practices, even when they no longer serve a rational purpose or when their consequences are destructive. The villagers’ unquestioning obedience demonstrates a collective resistance to change and critical thinking—traits necessary for moral development and societal progress (Schmidt, 2017). The story prompts reflection on contemporary practices that might be similarly unquestioned and potentially destructive, urging societies to critically reevaluate their traditions and whether they still serve humanity’s best interests.
Furthermore, Jackson’s portrayal of the village as a microcosm of broader societal dynamics reveals the danger inherent in unquestioned authority and collective ritual. The village elders or leaders do not explicitly coerce participation; instead, the tradition perpetuates itself through social inertia and peer pressure. The story suggests that societal acceptance of rituals often stems from fear of social ostracism or disruption rather than moral agreement (Gordon, 2021). This dynamic illustrates how cultural norms can perpetuate violence and injustice, especially when they are rooted in unquestioned authority.
In conclusion, Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" serves as a compelling warning against the dangers of blindly following tradition. The story reveals how societal rituals, initially benign or communal, can become institutions of violence and dehumanization when unquestioned. The inclusion of children among victims underscores the pervasiveness and brutality of such customs, and raises vital questions about the morality of societal conformity. As modern societies evolve, this narrative urges individuals to critically examine long-standing traditions and question practices that may have outlived their moral justification. Recognizing the potential for tradition to perpetuate harm underscores the importance of moral vigilance and the courage to challenge harmful societal norms.
References
- Gordon, M. (2021). The social psychology of conformity and obedience. Journal of Social Issues, 77(4), 938-954.
- Jackson, S. (1948). The Lottery. The New Yorker.
- Lodge, D. (2009). The art of fiction. Vintage.
- Sherman, N. (1988). The fabric of morality: Moral diversity and social understanding. Oxford University Press.
- Schmidt, J. (2017). Cultural rituals and their impact on community behavior. Cultural Sociology, 11(2), 243-260.
- SparkNotes. (2016). The Lottery: Themes, Motifs, and Symbols. Retrieved from https://www.sparknotes.com/literature/lottery/themes/
- Jackson, S. (1948). The Lottery. The New Yorker.
- 123helpme.com. (2016). The Lottery, Shirley Jackson -- Morals and Values in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson. Retrieved from https://123helpme.com/
- SparkNotes. (2016). SparkNotes: The Lottery: Themes, Motifs, and Symbols. Retrieved from https://www.sparknotes.com/literature/lottery/themes/