Running Head: The Title Of Your Paper2 Replace With The Titl

Running Head The Title Of Your Paper2replace With The Title Of Your P

The instructions require writing a comprehensive graduate-level research paper in project management. The paper should include the following sections: abstract, introduction, problem statement and justification, literature review, proposed solution approach, conclusion, and references. Each section has specific content and length requirements. The abstract must summarize the project in 150-250 words, including the purpose, approach, results, and conclusion, followed by keywords. The introduction should be about two pages, explaining the importance of the research, the context, relevant terminology, and its relation to project management fields.

The problem statement must be 2-3 pages, clearly defining the problem, its significance, and potential questions or hypotheses. The literature review should be 8-10 pages, providing a synthesis of 10-20 scholarly sources, identifying gaps, and organizing themes logically. The proposed solution approach, especially for students working on the capstone or applied project, details the research design, methodology, data collection instruments, sample, and validation techniques, with IRB approval if involving human subjects. The conclusion restates the importance of the research, summarizes findings, and suggests future directions.

The references section must follow APA style, listing all sources used in the paper in alphabetical order with proper formatting. The assignment includes proper APA citations and paraphrasing of sources, highlighting consensus and debates among researchers, and explaining the significance of claims.

Paper For Above instruction

This graduate research paper aims to explore a specific challenge or issue within project management, employing a structured academic approach. The study begins with a concise abstract that encapsulates the research's core elements: its purpose, methodology, key findings, and implications. The introduction sets the context by emphasizing the importance of the topic within the field of project management, defining relevant terms, and illustrating how the research connects to broader knowledge areas.

The problem statement articulates a clearly defined issue, emphasizing its relevance and potential questions that guide the research. Justification is provided through a review of existing literature and practical consequences of neglecting the problem. The literature review synthesizes current research, identifying trends, thematic gaps, and areas necessitating further investigation. This section demonstrates a thorough understanding of scholarly contributions and situates the research within the field’s evolving landscape.

The proposed solution approach details the research design tailored to deepen understanding or test hypotheses. It discusses the methodology (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), data collection tools such as surveys or interviews, sample characteristics, and procedural steps, including ethical considerations like IRB approval when applicable. This section articulates how validity and reliability will be maintained, enhancing the potential for meaningful outcomes.

The conclusion reiterates the significance of the research findings, emphasizing their contribution to project management theory or practice. It critiques the existing literature, points out gaps, and suggests avenues for future research. The references are meticulously formatted in APA style, encapsulating scholarly sources that support the research framework.

This comprehensive approach ensures that the paper advances knowledge in project management, addressing relevant problems with rigor and clarity, aligned with graduate academic standards.

References

  • Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.
  • Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 38-48.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-344.
  • Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. Behavior Change, 21(2), 68-77.
  • Yoo, S., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of e-service. Journal of Business Research, 54(3), 169-176.
  • Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
  • Leach, L. P. (1999). Critical Chain Project Management. Artech House.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). Wiley.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach (9th ed.). Wiley.

Related Assignments