Safety Concerns Of Autonomous Ground Vehicles Literature Rev ✓ Solved

Safety Concerns Of Autonomous Ground Vehiclesliterature Review

Safety Concerns Of Autonomous Ground Vehiclesliterature Review

Write a Literature review regarding Safety Concerns of Autonomous Ground Vehicles. Expand on this section to find relevant research about accidents with AVs, their potential causation, and why people are afraid of using this technology.

Paper For Above Instructions

The rapid development and deployment of Autonomous Ground Vehicles (AGVs) have sparked significant discussions regarding their safety concerns. This literature review synthesizes various studies addressing the issues surrounding AGVs, including accidents linked to their operation, public perceptions of these technologies, and underlying fears that influence people's willingness to embrace AGVs.

Accidents Involving Autonomous Vehicles

A primary concern driving discussions about AGV safety is the risk of accidents. Liu, Du, and Xu (2019) explored public reactions to traffic accidents involving self-driving vehicles, concluding that people tend to exhibit biased responses. Their findings indicate a tendency to assign fault to the vehicle rather than the human counterparts involved in the accidents. This biased perception affects the public narrative regarding the safety of AGVs, with an inclination to associate them with increased risks (Liu et al., 2019).

Furthermore, Bansal et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on Texans' readiness to adopt connected and self-driving vehicles, uncovering a number of concerns associated with technology failure, decision-making algorithms, and uncertainty in unforeseen circumstances during operation. The report suggests that while there is a growing interest in AGVs, safety remains a prime concern that could impact public acceptance and regulatory policies.

The Role of Public Perception

Public opinion significantly influences the acceptance of autonomous technologies. Cunningham et al. (2019) investigated the willingness to pay for automated vehicles and identified that negative perceptions regarding their safety deter consumers from purchasing. The study emphasized that the public's fear stems not only from technical failures but also from ethical dilemmas surrounding decision-making in life-threatening situations.

Piao et al. (2016) examined the views of urban populations towards implementing automated vehicles, highlighting concerns about the adequacy of current infrastructure to support AGV integration. They noted that space for AGVs raises further safety issues, particularly in densely populated urban settings where pedestrian interactions increase the potential for accidents.

Concerns Regarding Trust and Risk

The concepts of trust and perceived risk play critical roles in the public's acceptance of AGVs. Zhang et al. (2019) argued that initial trust in technology is an essential determinant in the likelihood of accepting automated vehicles. Their research found that higher levels of perceived risk correlate with lower acceptance rates, suggesting that overcoming fear is a prerequisite for broader AGV acceptance.

In addressing the emotional facets influencing public perception, Liljamo et al. (2018) reported that societal attitudes towards AGVs are a reflection of historical reliance on human-driven vehicles. The novelty of AGVs leads to skepticism and fear about the unknown, which can hinder adoption rates regardless of the technology's demonstrated safety record.

Policy Implications and Recommendations

Given the varying degrees of concern surrounding safety, policymakers must prioritize public education about AGVs. Awareness campaigns can help educate the community on the safety records, operational protocols, and technological advancements that enhance AV operation. As Winter, Rice, and Lamb (2020) indicate in their research on consumer willingness to use autonomous air taxis, informed consumers tend to display increased confidence in new technologies when provided with transparent information.

Furthermore, fostering a dialogue between technology developers, policymakers, and the public will be vital in shaping policies that prioritize safety while paving the way for the adoption of AGVs. Continuous research efforts should strive to address the technical and societal challenges posed by automated technologies, ensuring a safe transition to an automated transportation future.

Conclusion

The literature surrounding Autonomous Ground Vehicles illustrates a complex interplay of safety concerns, public perceptions, and the emotional dimensions driving fear. While significant advancements have been made in the field, persistent concerns about accidents and the ethical implications of technology still cloud the future of AGVs. For these vehicles to gain wider acceptance, stakeholders must work collaboratively to build trust and mitigate fears through education and transparency.

References

  • Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M. (2018). Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans. Transportation, 45(2). doi:10.1007/s.
  • Cunningham, M.L., Regan, M.A., Ledger, S.A., & Bennett, J.M. (2019). To buy or not to buy? Predicting willingness to pay for automated vehicles based on public opinion. Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.012.
  • Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., & Pà¶llà¤nen, M. (2018). Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 24-44.
  • Liu, P., Du, Y., & Xu, Z. (2019). Machines versus humans: People’s biased responses to traffic accidents involving self-driving vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 125. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.012.
  • Piao, J., McDonald, M., Hounsell, N., Graindorge, M., Graindorge, T., & Malhene, N. (2016). Public views towards implementation of automated vehicles in urban areas. Transportation Research Procedia, 14. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.232.
  • Winter, S.R., Rice, S., & Lamb, T.L. (2020). A prediction model of consumer's willingness to fly in autonomous air taxis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101926.
  • Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 98. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018.