Sampling Strategy And Sample Size For A 288768
Sampling Strategy 6 Sampling Strategy and Sample Size for a Qualitative Research Plan
Sampling strategy beneficial to the study and factors contributing to the sampling strategy The best sampling strategy for qualitative research on alternative and complementary medicine for schizophrenics is homogeneous sampling strategy. The sampling technique will involve selection of similar cases that will need further investigation regarding alternative and complementary medicines for the treatment of schizophrenics. The logic behind this sampling strategy is in contrast to the logic of having a maximum variation sampling.
Parametric tests of location that include tests such as ANOVA F and Student t test will depend on assumptions of homogeneity variance experienced in the treatment groups. Statistical significance levels will be modified by violation of assumptions, this happens when the sample sizes are not equal; on the other hand, when a larger variance is associated with a smaller sample, the probability of Type I error will exceed the significance level (Trappenberg and Hollensen, 2013). Moreover, a larger variance that is associated with a large sample size the probability of Type I error will fall below the significant level; considerable evidence exists that separate the versions of variances of the t test and effectively restores the significant level under the existing conditions.
Generally, it is agreed that preliminary tests done for homogeneity of the variance has not been successful when it comes to data analysis, and thus, when the choice of a test of location depends on preliminary tests of equality of variance, there is a possibility for the significant level to be distorted even in the event that the test chosen as a substitute performs well. For instance, previous simulation studies conducted have the separate-variance t test turn out to be effective for a wide range of sample sizes including the population variances. On the other hand, a two-stage procedure that will include a preliminary test of equality of variances will be ineffective, in other words, a substitution of separate-variance test for a student t test at the second stage that is conditional on rejection of the null hypothesis of equal variance during the first stage means the significance level will be substantially altered.
Bias under the compound will be accounted for Type II errors that will be present in the preliminary test, the results are a suggestion that the best practical solution to the problem regarding heterogeneous variance is the unconditional substitution of separate-variance t test for student t test in the event that the sample sizes are unequal. The research paper will explore different approaches to issues mentioned above and not find a preliminary test that can detect unequal variance in the population, this enables an appropriate test to be a substitute for the t test. Rather, the question asked is whether the population variance is heterogeneous and whether it is possible to find samples that have nearly equal variance, and how can Type I error probability be modified.
This is to say that the study will investigate the conditional probability of type I error under the violation of homogeneity of variance, and the condition present is that the sample variances are equal (Friston, 2013). Equality comes about as a chance that results from random sampling or having an explicit selection in a research study. Sample size used for the study planned and factors contributing to the The case study will use smaller samples for an in-depth analysis because it is multimodal, concrete and contextual. The sampling frame is the list of elements from which the sample is drawn; in this study the sampling frame consists of patients that have used alternative and complementary medicine for schizophrenics (Greenwood et al, 2011).
First sampling technique is stratified sampling, and this is the identification of sub-groups of the population and their proportions and select from each sub-group to form a sample. There are descriptions of a census as a count of all the elements in a population; where the population is considered to be small, a census is recommended. The local sample size will be 400, and the population will be stratified according to demographics. Cluster sampling technique will also be used and under this technique, the population will be divided into smaller groups then some of the clusters will be selected as the sample where the cluster members chosen will be studied. This design is suitable based on its potential to select groups rather than individual members because it is not possible to construct sampling frame.
Justification for using stratified and cluster sampling techniques Stratified sampling will partition the target population into various non-overlapping groups that are referred to as strata, and then a sample will be selected by some design within each stratum. For instance the hospitals used in the study can be from different geographical regions, these hospitals will be stratified into similar regions by means of a known variable such as the habitat type, elevation, among others. Another example is the determination of the proportion of patients that have used either alternative or complementary medicine for schizophrenics, in this case, the sample stratified may be based on the treatment taken.
The principal reason for the use of stratified sampling technique rather than opting for simple random sampling technique is that stratification will be able to produce smaller errors of estimation as compared to the use of simple random sampling of the same size. The result will be true if the measurements within the strata are homogeneous. Cost per observation that is incurred in the observational be reduced significantly through population elements stratification into various convenient groupings. To add to this, when the estimates of the population parameters are those desired for the subgroups of the population, identification of the groups can take place. Situations where simple random sampling or systematic random sampling is not possible, one of the common methods that can be used for sampling is cluster sampling technique.
One of the main reason for selection of cluster sampling technique over simple random sampling or systematic sampling is in the event that the list of all households in the population does not exist in the population. To add to this, there may be possibilities of creating such a list and the households are not arranged in a specified order, such situation often exists in normal populations especially the stable and emergency affected populations. Cluster sampling technique can the thought in another way as a way to randomly choose a smaller and smaller geographic area until the researcher gets an area small enough that a list of all households can be created. The list of households are created for the purpose of performing simple random sampling or systematic random sampling; for instance, in the research on alternative and complementary medicine for schizophrenics, the researcher may choose patients from district level.
References
- Friston, K. (2013). Active inference and free energy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (3), 212-3. doi:
- Greenwood, T. A., Lazzeroni, L. C., Murray, S. S., Cadenhead, K. S., Calkins, M. E., Dobie, D. J., & Braff, D. L. (2011). Analysis of 94 candidate genes and 12 endophenotypes for schizophrenia from the consortium on the genetics of schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(9), 930-46.
- Trappenberg, T., & Hollensen, P. (2013). Sparse coding and challenges for bayesian models of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 232-3. doi: