Sarah Is A 65-Year-Old Client Coming To Your Clinic ✓ Solved
Sarah Is A 65 Year Old Client Who Is Coming To Your Clinic Meaningful
Sarah is a 65-year-old client who is coming to your clinic, Meaningful Reflections, for a lifespan interview. She’s interested in understanding her growth and development over the past 65 years by doing an in-depth life review. You will act as the clinical interviewer and assess her reflections. Instructions Watch the eight short videos below. Each video is a brief interview with Sarah, a client who is coming to you for a lifespan interview.
Use Erikson’s psychosocial theory to assess the videos. Each video will represent one of Erikson’s eight psychosocial stages. For each video, assess how Sarah resolved the psychosocial crisis at that particular stage. Remember, an individual doesn’t fully resolve each stage. The individual may successfully resolve parts of the stage and unsuccessfully resolve other parts of the stage.
Resolution is not an “either-or” (either successful or unsuccessful) resolution but rather a “both-and” (both successful and unsuccessful) resolution. For this assignment, thoroughly complete the Lifespan Interview form linked below: Provide a detailed description of how Sarah both successfully and unsuccessfully resolved each of Erikson’s psychosocial stages. Be specific in your explanations (i.e., summarize content from the video, use direct quotes from Sarah, etc.). Each stage should be at least 1-2 paragraphs in length. Define Kubler-Ross’ Stage of Grieving (DABDA) and describe how Sarah coped with each stage. Provide two (2) tips per stage to help Sarah cope with the loss of her husband.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Sarah’s upcoming lifespan interview offers a valuable opportunity to explore her psychosocial development through Erikson’s theory, while also considering her grieving process following the loss of her husband. As a 65-year-old woman, her reflections will illuminate how she has navigated each stage of psychosocial development, with an emphasis on both her successes and struggles. Additionally, understanding her coping mechanisms through Kubler-Ross’ stages of grief provides insight into her emotional resilience and areas needing support.
Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages and Sarah’s Resolutions
Stage 1: Trust versus Mistrust
In the initial video, Sarah describes her early childhood experiences that contributed to her development of trust. She recalls her mother’s consistent care, stating, “My mother was always there when I needed her, making me feel safe.” This indicates a successful resolution of trust, which laid the foundation for her to view the world as a reliable place. However, Sarah also mentions times when her caregivers were inconsistent, leading to moments of mistrust, such as “There were times I felt abandoned, especially when they were overwhelmed or忙. This created a sense of uncertainty.”
Sarah’s mixed experiences demonstrate that her resolution of trust versus mistrust has both successful and unsuccessful elements. Her ability to recognize her early reliance on caregiving aids her in understanding her current relationships, though residual mistrust occasionally challenges her sense of security.
Stage 2: Autonomy versus Shame and Doubt
In her second video, Sarah reflects on her childhood independence, recalling her desire to do things on her own. She says, “I loved choosing my clothes and setting my schedule,” which highlights her feeling of autonomy. Conversely, she admits that some instances, such as a failed attempt at cooking, left her feeling ashamed, “I thought I’d mess everything up, and that made me doubt myself.”
Her experiences suggest a partial resolution of autonomy. While she gained confidence in her abilities, moments of shame hovered, especially when faced with failures, which hindered complete independence. These mixed feelings likely influenced her later development as she balanced independence with doubt.
Stage 3: Initiative versus Guilt
Sarah describes her childhood initiatives, such as organizing neighborhood play, with pride. She states, “I was always eager to try new things and lead activities.” Yet, she reflects on times when her efforts were met with discouragement, explaining, “I once suggested a game, but my friends ignored me, and I felt guilty for trying to be bossy.”
This narrative indicates both a healthy drive to initiate activities and episodes of guilt that suppress her willingness to take charge. Her ability to pursue initiatives was successful overall, but guilt occasionally restrained her sense of agency, impacting her perseverance in leadership roles later in life.
Stage 4: Industry versus Inferiority
During her adolescence, Sarah describes excelling in school and extracurriculars. She shares, “I loved achieving good grades and being recognized for my efforts.” However, she also recalls periods of comparison and feeling inferior, such as, “I felt behind my classmates sometimes and wondered if I was good enough.”
The duality in her experiences suggests a combination of industry and inferiority. Her successes fostered competence, yet setbacks and social comparisons strained her confidence, impacting her self-esteem during adolescence and beyond.
Stage 5: Identity versus Role Confusion
In her adulthood reflections, Sarah discusses her exploration of career and relationships. She states, “I tried different jobs before settling into teaching,” illustrating a search for identity. Nonetheless, she admits to periods of confusion, “I wasn’t sure who I truly was or what I wanted,” especially after her husband’s death.
This indicates that Sarah has experienced both clarity and uncertainty regarding her identity. Her varied experiences reflect an ongoing process of self-definition, with moments of role confusion intertwined with periods of solidification.
Stage 6: Intimacy versus Isolation
Sarah vividly describes her marriage, highlighting closeness and emotional support: “My husband was my best friend and confidant.” However, she openly discusses feelings of loneliness after his passing, stating, “Sometimes I feel isolated, even though I have friends and family.”
This duality demonstrates that Sarah successfully developed intimacy in her marriage but faces challenges in maintaining closeness after her loss, leading to feelings of isolation. Her ongoing relationships offer support, yet grief complicates her capacity for deep intimacy.
Stage 7: Generativity versus Stagnation
As a grandmother and community volunteer, Sarah shows a strong sense of generativity. She remarks, “I find purpose in mentoring young women and giving back to my community.” Nonetheless, she admits some periods of stagnation, pondering, “Sometimes I wonder if I’ve done enough or if I’ve contributed meaningfully.”
Her contributions reflect a successful move toward generativity, though occasional doubts about her impact suggest room for growth in feeling fulfilled and actively mentoring.
Stage 8: Ego Integrity versus Despair
In the final stage, Sarah expresses both satisfaction and regret. She states, “Looking back, I’m proud of my family and career,” but also admits, “There are things I wish I had done differently.” Her reflections embody the both-and resolution, accepting her life’s successes and imperfections.
Kubler-Ross’ Stages of Grieving and Coping Strategies
Denial
Sarah initially refused to accept her husband's death, saying, “I just couldn’t believe he was gone.” This denial served as a temporary shield against overwhelming grief, allowing her to gradually process her loss.
Anger
She experienced anger, questioning, “Why did this happen to us?” This emotion was part of her initial confrontation, fueling her need to understand her loss.
Bargaining
Sarah recounts moments of bargaining, wishing she could have done more: “Maybe if I had held on tighter, it would have been different.” These thoughts reflected her attempts to regain control.
Depression
Experiencing profound sadness, she admits, “I felt empty and cried during many nights,” which aligns with her depressive phase, acknowledging her vulnerability.
Acceptance
Finally, Sarah finds acceptance, stating, “I’ve learned to live with my loss and cherish the memories.” Her progression through these stages illustrates her coping process.
Tips to Support Sarah in Coping with Loss
- Encourage expressive outlets such as journaling or art therapy to facilitate emotional processing and mourning.
- Suggest participation in support groups where sharing experiences with others who have lost loved ones can foster healing and understanding.
Conclusion
Sarah’s reflections reveal a nuanced journey through Erikson’s psychosocial stages, marked by both successes and struggles in her development. Her grieving process aligns with Kubler-Ross’ stages, showcasing her resilience and ongoing needs for support. Understanding these dynamics allows for targeted interventions to promote her well-being and continued growth in later life.
References
- Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death and Dying. Macmillan.
- McLeod, S. A. (2013). Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stages. Simply Psychology.
- Worden, J. W. (2009). Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy. Springer Publishing.
- Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.
- Parkes, C. M., & Prigerson, H. G. (2010). Theories of grief. In Murdoch, D., & L. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Bereavement Studies.
- Rando, T. (1993). Treatment of Complicated Mourning. Research Press.
- Neimeyer, R. A. (2000). Narrative Construction in bereavement: Meaning making and the healing process. Death Studies, 24(6), 543–558.
- Vanderweele, T. J., et al. (2017). Meaning in life and mental health. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(5), 587–593.
- Lichtenthal, W. G., et al. (2011). Grief and growth: Perspectives on resilience. Death Studies, 35(4), 239–253.