Sarbanes Oxley Paper Name University Of P

Sarbanes Oxley Paper5sarbanes Oxley Papernameuniversity Of Phoenixacc

The United States federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act was founded to improve the accuracy and reliability to ultimately protect investors. The Act is known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Protection Act of 2002. The Act was signed into law on July 30, 2002.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was enacted in response to high-profile corporate scandals such as Enron and WorldCom, aiming to restore public confidence in the accuracy of corporate financial reporting (Spurzem, 2006). In the late 1990s and early 2000s, widespread corporate fraud and mismanagement went unregulated, undermining investor trust. The passage of SOX sought to address these issues by implementing stricter regulatory measures to prevent fraudulent financial practices and enhance transparency.

Legislative Background and Passage

During this period, the political climate reflected urgency, with President George W. Bush advocating for legislative reforms to protect investors and United States financial markets. The bill received overwhelming support in Congress, passing the House 423-3 and the Senate 99-0. The bipartisan consensus demonstrated the importance placed on corporate accountability. The law was signed by President Bush, marking one of the most extensive reforms of business regulation since the Securities Act of 1934.

Objectives and Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The core objective of SOX was to prevent corporate fraud, improve the accuracy of financial disclosures, and hold executives accountable for misstatements and unethical conduct. To achieve this, the Act established rigorous standards for corporate governance, internal controls, and financial reporting processes.

One critical aspect is the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which oversees enforcement. The SEC has introduced harsher penalties for violations, including longer jail sentences and increased fines for executives knowingly falsifying financial data (United States Congress, 2002). For example, Section 802(a) explicitly criminalizes the intentional alteration or destruction of records with potential penalties of up to 20 years imprisonment.

Impact on the Accounting Profession

One of the significant changes enforced by SOX was the creation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The PCAOB is a non-profit organization established by Congress to oversee audits of public companies, ensuring their independence and adherence to ethical standards (Johnson, 2011). Public accounting firms that audit publicly traded companies are required to register with the PCAOB, which enforces strict codes of ethics and quality control standards.

Another vital component is Section 404, which mandates management assessments of internal controls over financial reporting. CEOs and CFOs are required to certify the effectiveness of these controls in annual reports, fostering accountability (United States Congress, 2002). This section emphasizes transparency and necessitates detailed internal control reports, aiming to reduce errors and fraudulent practices within organizations.

Achievements and Challenges

Since its enactment, SOX has significantly increased the accountability of corporate executives and improved the transparency of financial disclosures. It has led to stronger corporate governance frameworks, increased investor confidence, and a decline in financial misconduct. Nevertheless, there are criticisms regarding the increased regulatory burden, compliance costs, and potential stifling of innovation, especially for smaller companies (Beasley et al., 2009).

Despite these challenges, many experts agree that the law has fostered a culture of increased responsibility and ethics within the corporate world. It has laid a foundation for ongoing reforms geared toward safeguarding investors and ensuring the integrity of financial markets.

Conclusion

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a pivotal legislative effort to address corporate fraud and restore investor confidence after major scandals rocked the business world. Its emphasis on transparency, internal controls, and auditor oversight has transformed corporate governance practices in the United States. While there is room for further improvements, particularly to reduce compliance burdens and foster ethical corporate cultures, its implementation has undoubtedly enhanced the safety and integrity of investment in public companies.

Future reforms should continue to focus on strengthening ethical standards, promoting technological innovations in compliance, and ensuring that regulation adapts to evolving business environments to protect investors effectively.

References

• Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2009). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 23(1), 81-98.
• Johnson, J. (2011). PCAOB oversees the audits of public companies. https://pcaobus.org/Pages/default.aspx
• Spurzem, B. (2006). Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sarbanesoxleyact.asp
• United States Congress. (2002). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law 107-204. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O.
• Spurzem, B. (2006). Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sarbanesoxleyact.asp