Save Link Assignment Article Summary View Rubric Due Date Ap

Save Linkassignment Article Summaryview Rubricdue Date Apr 06 2016 2

Read "Read-Only Participants: A Case for Student Communication in Online Classes." Write a 1000-word summary of the article. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Paper For Above instruction

The article titled "Read-Only Participants: A Case for Student Communication in Online Classes" by Nagel, Blignaut, and Cronjé (2009) examines the critical role of student participation and community building in online education environments. The authors highlight that establishing an online learning community is essential for the successful completion of courses, especially in web-based programs. They emphasize that the interaction between peers and facilitators greatly influences student engagement, learning outcomes, and retention.

Central to the discussion is the concept of online student "visibility" and its multifaceted nature. Visibility extends beyond mere participation in discussions; it encompasses read-only participation—students who scan discussions without actively contributing—as well as students who are highly visible by virtue of their presence without necessarily engaging in discourse. The authors explore how different forms of participation—active, passive, and strategic—affect the development of a cohesive virtual community. They suggest that high-quality contributions, rather than quantity, foster trust among students and are vital for a thriving online learning environment.

The study employs a mixed-methods approach within an online course on web-based education offered in a Masters degree program at the University of Pretoria. Quantitative measures reveal significant differences in performance related to different types of engagement, although some trends remain unexplained. The qualitative data uncover students' perceptions of the discontent caused by "invisible students"—those who are absent without reason or contribute superficially, which hampers group cohesion and diminishes the sense of community. The authors highlight that such students, often read-only participants, can undermine the collective learning experience by disrupting trust and collaboration.

Nagel et al. (2009) discuss several strategies to mitigate read-only participation and enhance active engagement. These include clearly communicating the minimum required number of online postings, promoting thoughtful and high-quality contributions, and incorporating assessments such as grading discussions and providing formative feedback. They also recommend assigning individual grades for group projects, rotating group members, and supplementing facilitator communication with Internet-independent media to provide access to crucial information regardless of connectivity challenges. These interventions aim to encourage meaningful participation and foster a sense of community among students.

The article emphasizes that students' ability to adapt to online learning constraints—such as limited internet access or high costs—can influence their participation patterns. Those who manage their log-in time effectively can still benefit from the virtual community, whereas students who rarely contribute risk missing out on the supportive, collaborative learning experience. The authors argue that fostering a community where high-quality engagement is recognized and rewarded promotes trust, motivation, and deeper learning among participants.

Furthermore, the authors critique the disruptive effect of read-only participants, describing them as a challenge to the cohesion of the virtual community. To address this, they suggest multiple measures including formative assessment, clear participation requirements, and utilizing varied communication media to ensure all students remain engaged and informed. By doing so, online courses can cultivate an environment where students feel connected, valued, and motivated to participate actively, thereby enhancing overall course success.

In conclusion, Nagel et al. (2009) underscore the importance of proactive strategies to encourage active participation in online courses. They argue that fostering a vibrant, trustworthy, and supportive online learning community requires deliberate effort from facilitators and students alike. Recognizing diverse participation styles and implementing targeted interventions can help diminish the prevalence of read-only participants, ultimately leading to more successful and enriching online educational experiences.

References

• Nagel, L., Blignaut, A. S., & Cronjé, J. C. (2009). Read-only participants: A case for student communication in online classes. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/
• Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
• Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view. Cengage Learning.
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building community in online courses: Which methods are most effective? The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 63-73.
• Schrum, L. (2010). Building online learning communities. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 1(4), 61-72.
• (Other references should be added for a total of at least 10 credible sources following APA format.)