Scenario 1: You Are The First Person To Arrive In Your Class
Scenario 1you Are The First Person To Arrive In Your Classroom And As
Scenario 1: You are the first person to arrive in your classroom and as you sit down you notice an iPod on the floor underneath the adjacent seat. You pick it up and turn it on. It works fine and even has some of your favorite music listed. You realize that you are the only one in the room and no one will know if you keep it. You see other students entering the room so you place the iPod on the floor next to your belonging.
Scenario 2: Instead of finding the iPod, you are a friend who sits next to the person who finds it. As class begins, your friend leans over and asks your advice about what to do.
Scenario 3: You are now a student representative on the judicial board at school. The student who kept the iPod is accused of stealing.
How would you make the decision about the situation? Students are asked to consider the following questions related to the above scenarios. What are the key facts that you should consider before making a decision, as either the person who discovered the iPod, the friend, or the judicial board member? Is this an ethical issue? What exactly are the ethical aspects involved in your decision?
Who else is involved, or should be involved, in this decision? Who has a stake in the outcome? What alternatives are available to you? What are the consequences of each alternative? How would each of your alternatives affect the other people you have identified as having a stake in the outcome? Where might you look for additional guidance to assist you in resolving this particular dilemma?
Paper For Above instruction
The scenarios presented pose complex ethical questions centered around honesty, integrity, responsibility, and fairness. Each scenario requires careful consideration of key facts, ethical principles, and potential consequences. This essay explores the ethical dilemmas involved in each scenario, the stakeholders affected, available options, and sources of guidance for ethical decision-making.
Scenario 1: The Discoverer of the iPod
In the first scenario, an individual finds an iPod in the classroom and, after verifying it functions and recognizing personal music, faces a moral decision about what action to take. The key facts include the presence of the iPod, its ownership, the individual's knowledge that it likely belongs to someone else, and the opportunity to keep or return it. The ethical issue revolves around honesty and respect for property. Keeping the iPod without attempting to return it constitutes dishonesty and theft, violating societal norms and school policies.
The ethical principle of integrity suggests that the individual should act honestly and correctly by attempting to find the owner or turn the device over to relevant authorities, such as a teacher or school administrator. Factors like the owner's rights, the potential emotional distress caused by theft, and the individual's moral character influence the decision. Choosing to keep the iPod could lead to consequences such as disciplinary action, loss of trust, or feelings of guilt, whereas returning it fosters trustworthiness and respect.
Additional guidance might be sought from school policies on theft and honesty, as well as ethical frameworks like Kantian ethics, which emphasize duty and moral obligation. Ultimately, the responsible action aligns with the ethical principle of respecting others' property and honesty.
Scenario 2: The Friend's Dilemma
In the second scenario, a student observes a peer who finds an iPod and seeks advice about what to do. The key facts involve witnessing the discovery, understanding that the iPod likely belongs to someone else, and being asked for guidance. Ethical aspects include loyalty to friends, honesty, and integrity. The temptation to advise secrecy or concealment conflicts with moral obligations to be truthful and uphold justice.
The stakeholder in this scenario is the friend who found the device, the owner of the iPod, and the broader school community that values honesty. Providing ethical advice involves encouraging the friend to act responsibly by attempting to locate the owner or inform an authority. An unethical suggestion would involve encouraging concealment or dishonesty, which could perpetuate theft or allow misconduct to go unpunished.
Alternatives include advising the friend to return the iPod directly, turn it into a teacher, or find the owner through other reasonable means. Each alternative has consequences: returning the device promotes honesty; failing to do so risks complicity in dishonesty. The ethical approach aligns with fostering moral responsibility and integrity, guided by principles from ethical theories emphasizing honesty and accountability.
Scenario 3: The Judicial Board Member
The third scenario involves a student judicial board member tasked with determining whether a student who kept the iPod committed theft. This scenario introduces a formal ethical and legal process, requiring the evaluation of evidence, fairness, and justice. The key facts include the evidence of possession, the context of the discovery, and the accused student's behavior.
The ethical principles involved include fairness, impartiality, and justice. The stakeholder affected is the accused student, the accuser, classmates, and the school community. The judicial board member must weigh the evidence objectively, ensuring that decisions are based on facts and adhere to school policies and ethical standards.
Alternative actions include conducting a thorough investigation, providing the accused with an opportunity for explanation, and applying consistent disciplinary procedures. The risks of bias or injustice could compromise the integrity of the process, affecting the reputation of the judicial system and trust within the school community.
Obtaining guidance from legal principles, school policies, ethical codes of conduct, and consulting with experienced advisors can assist in making a fair decision. The overarching ethical obligation is to uphold justice, fairness, and due process, ensuring that actions serve the greater good and respect individual rights.
Conclusion
Each scenario underscores vital ethical considerations: respect for property, honesty, responsibility, and justice. Determining the right course of action requires careful analysis of facts, implications for stakeholders, available options, and ethical principles. Consulting established ethical frameworks and institutional policies can guide individuals toward morally sound decisions, fostering trust, integrity, and fairness in school settings and beyond.
References
- Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development: Vol. 1. The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row.
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger Publishers.
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
- Kidder, R. M. (2005). Moral Courage: Perseverance, Integrity, and Courage in Action. HarperCollins.
- Banks, S. (2012). Ethical Issues in Education. Routledge.
- Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development, self-authorship, and moral identity. Journal of Moral Education, 23(2), 165-182.
- Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2016). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right. Wiley.
- Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
- Johnson, C. E. (2017). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow. SAGE Publications.