Scenario Using Traits To Select A Candidate ✓ Solved

Scenario Using Traits To Select A Candidate

You are the director of a large social service agency responsible for overseeing 1,000 people. Your agency is currently hiring an assistant director to manage a newly mandated day-care facilities program, replacing an older, less regulated system. The old program had high thresholds and light enforcement, but the new legislation introduces lower thresholds, stricter guidelines—including background checks, unannounced site visits, and specific reporting requirements—and substantial sanctions for non-compliance. The new assistant director's team will be small, approximately fifteen staff members, and the position is critical due to heightened public scrutiny of childcare safety following recent abuse scandals.

You have three candidates for this position:

• Candidate A: Doris Miller – An eighteen-year veteran with the agency, previously serving as the program administrator for childcare regulation. She exhibits moderate self-confidence, responsibility, hard work, and even-temperedness, but has not demonstrated decisiveness or flexibility in her experience. While somewhat goal-oriented, she has not shown a high need for achievement and faces potential demotion if not selected, given limited opportunities at her current level.
• Candidate B: John Quintanilla – A supervisor in child protective services with a strong understanding of agency operations and child welfare issues. He is highly self-confident, decisive, energetic, and motivated, but struggles with teamwork, often being perceived as abrasive and aloof. His interpersonal skills are limited, and he tends to be self-absorbed, affecting his likability.
• Candidate C: Janet Dahlerus – Coming from a more highly regulated jurisdiction, she demonstrates unquestioned competence, integrity, and good interpersonal skills. However, her enthusiasm for the new legislation appears limited, and she is reluctant to relocate due to personal reasons. She shows a lack of assertiveness and a low need for responsibility, which may impact her motivation for the role.

Selection Criteria & Traits Analysis

The core traits relevant to this candidate selection include self-confidence, responsibility, decisiveness, flexibility, motivation, teamwork, and integrity. Self-confidence is essential to effectively lead and adapt to the new legislation's stringent requirements. Responsibility is critical given the accountability associated with childcare safety and compliance. Decisiveness and flexibility are vital due to the complex and evolving nature of the regulatory environment.

Motivation, particularly a high need for achievement, would drive proactive leadership, essential for navigating policy changes and ensuring team compliance. Teamwork and interpersonal skills are important, especially considering the high public visibility and the need to foster cooperative staff relations. Integrity and a strong ethical orientation underpin trustworthiness, a necessity in regulatory oversight involving children's welfare.

Candidate Evaluation Based on Traits

Doris Miller's lengthy tenure indicates institutional knowledge and experience with childcare regulation. Her responsible and steady nature suggests she can uphold the agency’s standards and procedures. However, her lack of decisiveness and flexibility might hinder her effectiveness in a rapidly changing, tightly regulated environment. Her moderate self-confidence and low achievement motivation are potential limitations, especially when leading through complex legislative changes and enforcement challenges. Her potential demotion if not selected underscores her limited upward mobility, possibly affecting her motivation.

John Quintanilla's high self-confidence, decisiveness, and energetic approach are advantageous, particularly in establishing strict compliance and enforcement of the new legislation. Yet, his poor interpersonal skills and abrasive demeanor pose risks to team cohesion, which is critical in a small, high-stakes team. His difficulty in team building could undermine collaborative efforts and staff morale, essential components in ensuring effective regulatory practices. His self-absorption and reputation for being unlikable may also create challenges in stakeholder interactions and organizational culture shaping.

Janet Dahlerus possesses unquestioned competence and integrity, aligning well with the ethical demands of the role. Her experience in a highly regulated environment suggests she can adapt to the new legal requirements. Nevertheless, her apparent lack of enthusiasm, low motivation for assuming responsibility, and reluctance to relocate could compromise her engagement with the role's demanding nature. Her bureaucratic style may also hinder innovative problem-solving and adaptive leadership necessary for the evolving landscape of childcare regulation.

Conclusion & Recommendation

Considering the necessary traits, the ideal candidate must combine technical competence, ethical integrity, strong motivation, decisiveness, and the ability to foster teamwork. While Doris offers extensive experience and knowledge, her limitations in decisiveness and flexibility could impede her performance in managing the complex transition to the new legislation. Janet, despite her competence, may lack the motivation and adaptability needed and has personal barriers that could affect her commitment.

John's decisiveness and energy are valuable; however, his interpersonal deficits and team-building shortcomings pose significant risks. Nonetheless, with targeted leadership development, he could potentially excel in this role by leveraging his strengths while improving relational skills.

After weighing these factors, I would recommend selecting John Quintanilla, complemented by coaching to enhance his team-building and interpersonal abilities. His proactive, decisive nature aligns well with the regulatory demands, and with supplemental leadership training, he can develop into a well-rounded leader capable of ensuring compliance, fostering team cohesion, and effectively navigating the new legislative environment.

References

• Wart, M. V., & Medina, P. S. (2023). Leadership in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Introduction (4th ed.). Routledge.
• Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33-56.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Multiple levels of leader charisma: Multilevel modeling of individual, team, and organizational effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 733-753.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden, Inc.
• Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 6-16.
• Van Wart, M. (2013). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 284-309.
• Edmondson, A. C., & Spiterri, E. (2016). Teamwork and leadership in health and human services. Harvard Business Review.